Calcium modulates interactions between bacteria and hydroxyapatite

Journal of Dental Research

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1124-1128

  Venegas, S C ^a   Palacios, J M ^a   Apella, M C ^a,b,c   Morando, P J ^b,d,e   Blesa, M A ^b,d,f  

^a CENTRO DE REFERENCIA PARA LACTOBACILOS CERELA CONICET   (Argentina)

^b Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE TUCUMÁN   (Argentina)

^d CENTRO ATÓMICO CONSTITUYENTES   (Argentina)

^e UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE SAN MARTÍN   (Argentina)

^f Universidad National de General San Martin   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Bacteria; Hydroxyapatite; Interactions; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; CALCIUM; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROPHORESIS; HUMAN; HYDROPHOBICITY; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; PH; PHYSIOLOGY; POWDER; SALIVA; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADSORPTION; BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CALCIUM; DURAPATITE; ELECTROPHORESIS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS CASEI; LACTOBACILLUS FERMENTUM; POWDERS; SALIVA; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 33845598294     PISSN: 00220345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/154405910608501211     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Blesa MA, Morando PJ, Regazzoni AE (1993). Ionic oxides. In: Chemical dissolution of metal oxides. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, p. 153.
2. Busscher HJ, Bos R, van der Mei HC (1995). Initial microbial adhesion is a determinant for the strength of biofilm adhesion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 128:229-234.
3. Cann R (1978). Ligand binding in associating systems. Meth Enzymol 48:299-307.
4. de Aza PN, de Aza S (2004). Biocerámicas. In: Biomateriales. Sastre R, de Aza S, San Roman J, editors. Faenza, RA: Editrice Ibérica S.I., p. 54 [article in Spanish].
5. Eifert R, Rosan B, Golub E (1984). Optimization of an hydroxyapatite adhesion assay for Streptococcus sanguis. Infect Immun 44:287-291.
6. García Rodenas L, Palacios JM, Apella MC, Morando PJ, Blesa M (2005). Surface properties of various powdered hydroxyapatites. J Colloid Interface Sci 290:145-154.
7. Guggenheim M, Shapiro S, Gmür R, Guggenheim B (2001). Spatial arrangements and associative behavior of species in an in vitro oral biofilm model. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1343-1350.
8. Hunter RJ (1981). The calculation of zeta potential. In: Zeta potential in colloid science. Ottewill RH, Rowell RL. editors. New York: Academic Press, pp. 59-124.
9. Kambara M, Asai T, Kumasaki M, Konishi K (1978). An electrochemical study on the human dental enamel with special reference to isoelectric point. J Dent Res 57:306-312.
10. Pelletier C, Bouley C, Cayuela C, Bouttier S, Bourlioux P, Bellon-Fontaine MN (1997). Cell surface characteristics of Lactobacillus casei subsp. casei, Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1725-1731.
11. Raibaud P, Caulet M, Galpin J, Mocquot G (1961). Studies on the bacterial flora of the alimentary tract of pigs. II. Streptococci; selective enumeration and differentiation of the dominant groups. Appl Bacteriol 24:285-291.
12. Rose RK, Dibdin GH, Shellis RP (1993). A quantitative study of calcium binding and aggregation in selected oral bacteria. J Dent Res 72:78-84.
13. Rose RK, Hogg SD, Shellis RP (1994). A quantitative study of calcium binding by isolated streptococcal cell walls and lipoteichoic acid: comparison with whole cells. J Dent Res 73:1742-1747.
14. Rosenberg M, Gutnik D, Rosenberg E (1980), Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9:29-33.
15. Sonohara R, Muramatsu N, Ohshima H, Kondo T (1995). Difference in surface properties between Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus as revealed by electrophoretic mobility measurements. Biophys Chem 55:273-277.
16. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996). The solid-solution interface. In: Aquatic chemistry. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley-Interscience, pp. 516-613.
17. Sweet SP, MacFarlane TW, Samaranayake LP (1987). Determination of the cell surface hydrophobicity of oral bacteria using a modified hydrocarbon adherence method. FEMS Microbiol Lett 48:159-163.
18. van der Mei HC, Léonard AJ, Weerkamp AH, Rouxhet PG, Busscher HJ (1988). Surface properties of Streptococcus salivarius HB and nonfibrillar mutants: measurement of zeta potential and elemental composition with x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J Bacteriol 170:2462-2466.
19. van Loosdrecht MC, Lyklema J, Norde W, Schraa G, Zehnder AJ (1987). Electrophoretic mobility and hydrophobicity as measured to predict the initial steps of bacterial adhesion. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:1898-1901.
20. Verwey EJW, Overbeek JThG (1948). Theory of the stability of lyophobic colloids. Amsterdam-New York: Elsevier, pp. 1-205.
21. Weerkamp AH, McBride BC (1980). Adherence of Streptococcus salivarius HB and HB-7 to oral surfaces and saliva-coated hydroxyapatite. Infect Immun 30:150-158.
22. Weerkamp AH, Uyen HM, Busscher HJ (1988). Effect of zeta potential and surface energy on bacterial adhesion to uncoated and saliva-coated human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 67:1483-1487.
23. Yoshida Y, Wakasa K, Kajie Y, Takahashi H, Urabe H, Satou N, et al. (1998). Adherent bacteria cells in five dental materials: sonication effect. J Mater Sci Mater Med 9:117-120.