An intensity-augmented ordinal measure for visual correspondence

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 849-856

  Mittal, Anurag ^a,b   Ramesh, Visvanathan ^a  

^a SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERA SHAKE; FEATURE MATCHING; LINEAR TRANSFORMATION;

ALGORITHMS; CAMERAS; COMPUTER VISION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); IMAGE COMPRESSION; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 33845584934     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2006.56     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. K. Barnard and B. Funt. Camera characterization for color research. Color Research and Application, 27(3): 153-164, 2002.
2. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. PAMI, 24(4):509-522, April 2002.
3. D. Bhat and S. Nayar. Ordinal measures for visual correspondence. In CVPR, pages 351-357, 1996.
4. D. Bhat and S. Nayar. Ordinal measures for image correspondence. PAMI, 20(4):415-423, Apr. 1998.
5. G. Carneiro and A. Jepson. Multi-scale phase-based local features. In CVPR, pages I: 736-743, 2003.
6. D. Forsyth and J. Ponce. Computer Vision: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, 2003.
7. W. Freeman and E. Adelson. The design and use of steerable filters. PAMI, 13(9):891-906, September 1991.
8. D. Gabor. Theory of communication. Journal I.E.E., 3(93):429-457, 1946.
9. R. Gideon and R. A. Hollister. A rank correlation co-efficient. Journal of the Americal Statistical Association, 82(398):656-666, 1987.
10. M. Greiffenhagen, V. Ramesh, D. Comaniciu, and H. Niemann. Statistical modeling and performance characterization of a real-time dual camera surveillance system. In CVPR, pages 11:335-342, Hilton Head, SC, 2000.
11. M. Heikkil, M. Pietikainen, and J. Heikkila. A texture-based method for detecting moving objects. In BMVC, 2004.
12. Y. Ke and R. Sukthankar. Pca-sift: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors. In CVPR, pages II: 506-513, 2004.
13. M. Kendall and J. Gibbons. Rank Correlation Methods. Edward Arnold, fifth edition, 1990.
14. J. Kim, V. Kolmogorov, and R. Zabih. Visual correspondence using energy minimization and mutual information. In ICCV, pages 1033-1040, 2003.
15. D. Lowe. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2):91-110, Nov. 2004.
16. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. An affine invariant interest point detector. In ECCV, page I: 128 ff., 2002.
17. K. Mikolajczyk and C. Schmid. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. PAMI, 27(10):1615-1630, Oct. 2005.
18. T. Tuytelaars and L. Van Gool. Matching widely separated views based on affine invariant regions. IJCV, 59(1):61-85, Aug. 2004.
19. M. Varma and A. Zisserman. A statistical approach to texture classification from single images. IJCV, 62(1-2):61-81, Apr. 2005.
20. P. Viola and W. M. WellsIII. Alignment by maximization of mutual information,. In ICCV, pages 16-23, Boston, MA, 1995.
21. P. Vora, J. Farrell, J. D. Tietz, and D. H. Brainard. Digital color cameras - 1 and 2 - response models. Hewlett-Packard Laboratory, Technical Report, 2001.
22. R. Zabih and J. Woodfill. Non-parametric local transforms to computing visual correspondence. In ECCV, pages 151-158, 1994.