An ontology for PACS integration

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 316-327

  Kahn Jr , Charles E ^a   Channin, David S ^b   Rubin, Daniel L ^c  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge representation; Knowledge sharing and reuse; Ontologies; PACS; Prot g ; Semantic models; Systems integration; Transforming the Radiologic Interpretation Process (TRIP); Web Ontology Language (OWL); Workflow

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RADIOLOGY;

CLINICAL KNOWLEDGE; IMAGING PLANES; INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS; PATIENT POSITIONS;

IMAGE PROCESSING;

ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIGITAL IMAGING; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; METAPHYSICS; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; RADIOGRAPHY, THORACIC; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 33845582387     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: 1618727X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-006-0627-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Gruber TR. What is an ontology? http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/kst/what-is- an-ontology.html. Accessed 18 March 2006.
2. TR Gruber 1995 Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing Int J Hum-Comput Stud 43 907 928
3. B Smith 2003 Ontology L Floridi Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information Blackwell Oxford 155 166
4. KP Andriole RL Morin RL Arenson 2004 Addressing the coming radiology crisis-the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology Transforming the Radiological Interpretation Process (TRIP) initiative J Digit Imaging 17 235 243
5. CE Kahn Jr 1998 An Internet-based ontology editor for radiology appropriateness criteria Comput Methods Programs Biomed 56 31 36
6. M Musen 1992 Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuse Comput Biomed Res 25 437 467
7. MA Musen JH Gennari H Eriksson SW Tu AR Puerta 1995 PROTEGE-II: computer support for development of intelligent systems from libraries of components Medinfo 8 Pt 1 766 770
8. Web Ontology Language (OWL). World Wide Web Consortium. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/. Accessed 13 July 2005.
9. PW Ballinger ED Frank V Merrill 2003 Merrill's Atlas of Radiographic Positions and Radiologic Procedures Mosby St. Louis, MO
10. DL Rubin Y Bashir D Grossman P Dev MA Musen 2005 Using an ontology of human anatomy to inform reasoning with geometric models Stud Health Technol Inform 111 429 435
11. Rubin DL, Dameron O, Musen MA (2005) Use of description logic classification to reason about consequences of penetrating injuries. Proc AMIA Symp: 649-653
12. Rubin DL, Hewett M, Oliver DE, Klein TE, Altman RB (2002) Automating data acquisition into ontologies from pharmacogenetics relational data sources using declarative object definitions and XML. Pac Symp Biocomput: 88-99
13. CL Sistrom CP Langlotz 2005 A framework for improving radiology reporting J Am Coll Radiol 2 159 167
14. M Henderson FM Behlen C Parisot EL Siegel DS Channin 2001 Integrating the healthcare enterprise: a primer. Part 4. The role of existing standards in IHE Radiographics 21 1597 1603
15. AE Flanders JA Carrino 2003 Understanding DICOM and IHE Semin Roentgenol 38 270 281
16. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise. American College of Cardiology, Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, Radiological Society of North America. http://www.ihe.net/. Accessed 13 July 2005.
17. RadLex: A Lexicon for Uniform Indexing and Retrieval of Radiology Information Resources. Radiological Society of North America. http://www.rsna.org/Radlex/. Accessed 20 January 2006.
18. Rubin DL: Improving RadLex using terminological analysis with ontology models. In: Radiological Society of North America. Chicago, IL, 2005.
19. MA Harris J Clark A Ireland 2004 The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource Nucleic Acids Res 32 D258 D261
20. J Sprague D Clements T Conlin 2003 The Zebrafish Information Network (ZFIN): the zebrafish model organism database Nucleic Acids Res 31 241 243
21. CA Ball G Sherlock H Parkinson 2002 Standards for microarray data Science 298 539
22. I Sim B Olasov S Carini 2004 An ontology of randomized controlled trials for evidence-based practice: content specification and evaluation using the competency decomposition method J Biomed Inform 37 108 119
23. WD Bidgood Jr. SC Horii FW Prior DE Van Syckle 1997 Understanding and using DICOM, the medical image communication standard J Am Med Inform Assoc 4 199 212
24. National Electronic Manufacturers Association. Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM). http://dicom.nema.org/. Accessed 13 July 2005.
25. Rosse C, Shapiro LG, Brinkley JF (1998) The digital anatomist foundational model: principles for defining and structuring its concept domain. Proc AMIA Symp: 820-824.
26. C Rosse JL Mejino Jr 2003 A reference ontology for biomedical informatics: the foundational model of anatomy J Biomed Inform 36 478 500
27. Foundational Model of Anatomy. Structural Informatics Group, University of Washington. http://sig.biostr.washington.edu/projects/fm/. Accessed 16 January 2006.
28. EL Siegel DS Channin 2001 Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise: a primer. Part 1. Introduction Radiographics 21 1339 1341
29. American College of Radiology ACR Appropriateness Criteria 2000. Radiology 215:1-1511, 2000
30. CL Sistrom JC Honeyman 2002 Relational data model for the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria J Digit Imaging 15 216 225
31. Appropriateness Criteria for Imaging and Treatment Decisions. American College of Radiology. http://www.acr.org/
32. American Medical Association (1997) Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology: CPT. Chicago: American Medical Association
33. HL7. Health Level Seven. http://www.hl7.org/. Accessed 13 July 2005.
34. Health Care Financing Administration (1989) The International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification: ICD-9-CM, U.S. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service
35. HJ Lowe GO Barnett 1994 Understanding and using the medical subject headings (MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches JAMA 271 1103 1108
36. Medical Subject Headings. National Library of Medicine. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/. Accessed 14 July 2005.
37. Coté RA, Rothwell DJ, Beckette R, Palotay J, (Eds.) SNOMED International: The Systematized Nomenclature of Human and Veterinary Medicine. Northfield, IL: College of American Pathologists, 1993.
38. SNOMED International. SNOMED CT. College of American Pathologists. http://www.snomed.org/snomedct/. Accessed 14 July 2005.
39. DAB Lindberg BL Humphreys AT [tmp] McCray 1993 The Unified Medical Language System Methods Inf Med 32 281 291
40. AT [tmp] McCray SJ Nelson 1995 The representation of meaning in the UMLS Methods Inf Med 34 193 201