Introducing probability and uncertainty in groundwater modeling with FEMWATER-LHS

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 332, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 206-213

  Hardyanto, W ^a   Merkel, B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SEMARANG   (Indonesia)

^b TU BERGAKADEMIE FREIBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Groundwater; Latin hypercube sampling; Numerical model; Probability; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; POROUS MATERIALS; PROBABILITY;

LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING (LHS); NUMERICAL MODEL; TRANSPORT MODULE;

GROUNDWATER FLOW;

CODES (SYMBOLS); FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GROUNDWATER FLOW; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUMERICAL METHODS; POROUS MATERIALS; PROBABILITY;

ALGORITHM; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 33845581893     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.035     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson M.P., and Woessner W.W. Applied Groundwater Modeling (Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport) (1992), Academic Press, Inc., London 381 pp.
2. Hardyanto W. Implementation of Latin Hypercube Sampling Algorithm for groundwater flow modelling. Wissenschatliche Mitteilungen Institut für Geologie 16 (2001) 195-204
3. Hardyanto, W., 2003. Groundwater Modeling Taking Into Account Probabilistic Uncertainties. FOG: Freiberg Online Geology (http://www.geo.tu-freiberg.de/fog/issues.html), vol. 10, p. 117.
4. Helton J.C. Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for use in Performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 42 (1993) 327-367
5. Henry, H.R., 1964. Effects of dispertion on salt encroachment in coastal aquifers, seawater in coastal aquifers. U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper No. 1613-C, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington D.C., pp. 35-69.
6. Huyakorn P.S., Andersen P.F., Mercer J.W., and White Jr. H.O. Saltwater intrusion in aquifers: development and testing of a three-dimensional finite element model. Water Resource Research 23 2 (1987) 293-312
7. Iman R.L. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for computer modeling applications. Releability Technology AD 28 (1992) 153-168
8. Iman R.L., and Conover W.J. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment. Communications in Statistics A9 17 (1980) 1749-1842
9. Iman R.L., and Conover W.J. A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables. Communications in Statistics B11 3 (1982) 311-334
10. Iman, R.L., Shortencarier, M.J., 1984. A FORTRAN 77 program and user's guide for the generation of Latin Hypercube and random samples for use with computer models, NUREG/CR-3624, SAND83-2365, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
11. Iman, R.L., Shortencarier, M.J., Johnson, 1985a. FORTRAN 77 Program and user's Guide for the Calculation of Partial Correlation and standardized Regression Coefficient., NUREG/CR-4122, SAND85-0044. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
12. Iman, R.L., Shortencarier, M.J., Johnson, 1985b. FORTRAN 77 Program and user's Guide for the Calculation of Partial Correlation and standardized Regression Coefficient. NUREG/CR-4122, SAND85-0044., Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
13. Jessen R.J. Square and cubic latice sampling. Biometrics 31 (1975) 449-471
14. Lin, H.C., Richards, D.R., Yeh, G.T., Cheng, J.R., Cheng, H.P., Jones, N.L., 1997. FEMWATER: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Computer Model for Simulating Density-Dependent Flow and Transport in Variably Saturated Media. Technical Report CHL-97-12. Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199, July 1997.
15. McKay M.D., Conover W.J., and Beckman R.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21 (1979) 239-245
16. McKenna S.A., Doherty J., and Hart D.B. Non-uniqueness of inverse transmissivity field calibration and predictive transport modeling. Journal of Hydrology 281 4 (2003) 265
17. Meinrath G., Ekberg C., Landgren A., and Liljenzin J.O. Assessment of uncertainty in parameter evaluation and prediction. Talanta 51 (2000) 231-246
18. Moore C., and Doherty J. Role of the calibration process in reducing model predictive error. Water Resources Research 41 5 (2005)
19. NN, 1997a. Argus Interware: Argus Numerical Environments and MeshMaker User's Guide.
20. NN, 1997b. Argus Interware: Argus Numerical Environments PIE Technical Notes. 31.
21. NN, 1997c. Argus Interware: User's guide Argus ONETM, Argus Open Numerical Environments. A GIS modeling system, version 4.0, Jericho, NY, Argus Holdings, Limited.
22. Yeh G.T. Computational Subsurface Hydrology: Reactions, Transport, and Fate (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston p. 344
23. Yeh, G.T., Chang, J.R., Gwo, J.P., Lin, H.C., Martin, W., Richards, D., 1994. 3DSALT: A Three-dimensional Salt Intrusion Model in Saturated-Unsaturated Media. Instruction Report HL-94-1. Waterway Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS.
24. Yeh, G.T., Hansen, S.S., Lester, B., Strobl, R., Scarbrough, J., 1992. 3DFEMWATER/3DLEWASTE: Numerical Codes for Delineating Wellhead Protection Areas in Agricultural Regions Based on the Assimilative Capacity Criterion, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.