Combining cues: Shape from shading and texture

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 1809-1816

  White, Ryan ^a   Forsyth, David A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

3D reconstruction; Deformable models; Shape from shading; Shape from texture; Surface tracking

Indexed keywords

DEFORMABLE MODELS; SHAPE FROM SHADING; SHAPE FROM TEXTURE; SURFACE TRACKING;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; TEXTURES; TRACKING (POSITION);

IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION;

EID: 33845581708     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2006.79     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Yoonsik Choe and R. L. Kashyap. 3-d shape from a shaded and textural surface image. PAMI, 1991.
2. D.A. Forsyth. Shape from texture and integrability. In Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, 2001.
3. D.A. Forsyth. Shape from texture without boundaries. In Proc. ECCV, volume 3, 2002.
4. D.A. Forsyth and A.P. Zisserman. Reflections on shading. PAMI, 13(7):671-679, 1991.
5. B.K.P. Horn. Shape from shading: a method for obtaining the shape of a smooth opaque object from one view. Ai tr-232, MIT, 1970.
6. T.S. Huang and C.H. Lee. Motion and structure from orthographic projections. PAMI, 1989.
7. A. Lobay and D.A. Forsyth. Recovering shape and irradiance maps from rich dense texton fields. In CVPR, 2004.
8. A. Loh and R. Hartley. Shape from non-homogeneous, non-stationary, anisotropic, perspective texture. In BMVC, 2005.
9. Julien Pilet, Vincent Lepetit, and Pascal Fua. Real-time non-rigid surface detection. In CVPR, 2005.
10. Xavier Provot. Deformation constraints in a mass-spring model to describe rigid cloth behavior. In Graphics Interface, 1995.
11. S. Savarese, M. Chen, and P. Perona. Recovering local shape of a mirror surface from reflection of a regular grid. In ECCV, 2004.
12. L. Tsap, D. Goldgof, and S. Sarkar. Nonrigid motion analysis based on dynamic refinement of finite element models. PAMI, 2000.
13. S.Ullman. The Interpretation of Visual Motion. MIT press, 1979.
14. Ryan White and David A. Forsyth. Deforming objects provide better camera calibration. Technical Report UCB/EECS-2005-3, U.C., Berkeley, 2005.
15. Ryan White and David A. Forsyth. Retexturing single views using texture and shading. In ECCV, 2006.
16. R. Zhang, P. Tsai, J. Cryer, and M. Shah. Shape from shading: A survey. PAMI, 1999.