메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-40

Comparing the quality of draft environmental impact statements by agencies in the United States since 1998 to 2004

Author keywords

DEIS ratings; Environmental impact statements; EPA; NEPA

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

EID: 33845581660     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.08.003     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (24)

References (18)
  • 1
    • 33646364529 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The influence of incomplete or unavailable information on environmental impact assessment in the USA
    • Atkinson S.F., Canter L.W., and Ravan M.D. The influence of incomplete or unavailable information on environmental impact assessment in the USA. Environ Impact Asses Rev 26 (2006) 448-467
    • (2006) Environ Impact Asses Rev , vol.26 , pp. 448-467
    • Atkinson, S.F.1    Canter, L.W.2    Ravan, M.D.3
  • 4
    • 0028983158 scopus 로고
    • Questionnaire checklist for cumulative impacts
    • Canter L.W., and Kamath J. Questionnaire checklist for cumulative impacts. Environ Impact Asses Rev 15 (1995) 311-339
    • (1995) Environ Impact Asses Rev , vol.15 , pp. 311-339
    • Canter, L.W.1    Kamath, J.2
  • 6
    • 1642407940 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory
    • Cashmore M. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environ Impact Asses Rev 24 (2004) 403-426
    • (2004) Environ Impact Asses Rev , vol.24 , pp. 403-426
    • Cashmore, M.1
  • 7
    • 33646462583 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency?
    • Cowell R., and Snell T. Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency?. Environ Impact Asses Rev 26 (2006) 359-376
    • (2006) Environ Impact Asses Rev , vol.26 , pp. 359-376
    • Cowell, R.1    Snell, T.2
  • 9
    • 30544450277 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability
    • Doelle M., and John S.A. Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability. Environ Impact Asses Rev 26 (2006) 185-205
    • (2006) Environ Impact Asses Rev , vol.26 , pp. 185-205
    • Doelle, M.1    John, S.A.2
  • 12
    • 0031103918 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The need for EIA theory-building
    • Lawrence D.P. The need for EIA theory-building. Environ Impact Asses Rev 17 (1997) 79-107
    • (1997) Environ Impact Asses Rev , vol.17 , pp. 79-107
    • Lawrence, D.P.1
  • 13
    • 29244455030 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment
    • Lee N. Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment. Environ Impact Asses Rev 26 (2006) 57-78
    • (2006) Environ Impact Asses Rev , vol.26 , pp. 57-78
    • Lee, N.1
  • 15
    • 22444452115 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Environmental modeling and assessment
    • Toth F., and Hizsnyik E. Environmental modeling and assessment. Earth Environ Sci 3 (1998) 193-207
    • (1998) Earth Environ Sci , vol.3 , pp. 193-207
    • Toth, F.1    Hizsnyik, E.2
  • 16
    • 0034307877 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Looking at the quality of draft environmental impact statements in the United States over time: have ratings improved?
    • Tzoumis K., and Finegold L. Looking at the quality of draft environmental impact statements in the United States over time: have ratings improved?. Environ Impact Asses Rev 20 (2000) 1-22
    • (2000) Environ Impact Asses Rev , vol.20 , pp. 1-22
    • Tzoumis, K.1    Finegold, L.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.