Cowpea evapotranspiration estimate using the Penman-Monteith model;Estimativa da evapotranspiração do feijão caupi utilizando o modelo de Penman-Monteith

IRRIGA

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 477-491

  Lima, José Romualdo de Sousa ^a   Antonino, Antonio Celso Dantas ^b   Soares, Willames de Albuquerque ^b   da Silva, Ivandro de França ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARAÍBA   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Bowen ratio; Irrigation; Latent heat; Soil water content; TDR

Indexed keywords

CROPS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; IRRIGATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MOISTURE; SOILS;

AIR TEMPERATURE; BOWEN RATIO; CANOPY; ENERGY BALANCE; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HERB; IRRIGATION; NET RADIATION; PENMAN-MONTEITH EQUATION; SOIL WATER;

EID: 33845576597     PISSN: 14137895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15809/irriga.2006v11n4p477-491     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ALLEN, R. G et al. Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration. Agronomy Journal, Madison, v.81, n.4, p.650-662, 1989.
2. ALLEN, R.G. et al. Crop evapotranspiration - guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO. Irrigation and Drainage Paper, n.56, p. 1-300, 1998.
3. BOHM, W. Methods of studying root systems. Berlin: Springer, 1979. 188 p.
4. BRASIL. Levantamento exploratório: reconhecimento de solos do Estado da Paraíba. Rio de Janeiro: Ministério da Agricultura, Equipe de Pedologia e Fertilidade do Solo, Divisão de Agrologia, SUDENE, 1972. 670 p.
5. BRUTSAERT, W. Evaporation into the atmosphere. Reidel: Dordrecht, 1982. 299 p.
6. de VRIES, D.A. Thermal properties of soils. In: van WIJK, W.R. (ed.). Physics of Plant . Environment. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1966. p.210-233.
7. EMBRAPA. Centro Naeional de Pesquisa de Solos. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Brasília, 1999. 412 p.
8. JARVIS, P.G. The interpretation of the variation in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London, Series B, Biological Sciences, Londres, v.273, n.927, p.593-610, 1976.
9. KUSTAS, W.P. et al. Variability in soil heat flux from a mesquite dune site. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v.103, n.3, p.249-264, 2000.
10. LIMA, J.R.S. et al. Comparação da sonda de nêutrons e de sensores tipo TDR na. medição do conteúdo de água do solo e na. estimativa da evapotranspiração do feijão caupi pelo método do balanço hidrico. In: INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR ATLANTIC CONFERENCE, 2., 2005, Santos. Anais ... Rio de Janeiro: Associção Brasileira de Energia Nuclear, 2005. 1 CD-ROOM
11. MONTEITH, J.L.; UNSWORTH, M. Principles of environmental physics. 2.ed. Londres: Edward Arnold, 1990. 291 p.
12. MURRAY, F. W. On the computation of saturation vapor pressure. Journal Applied of Meteorology, Boston, v.6, n.3, p.203-204, 1967.
13. NOILHAN, J.; PLANTON, S. A simple parameterization of land surface process for meteorological models. Monthly Weather Review, Washington, v. 177, n.3, p.536-549, 1989.
14. OLIOSO, A.; CARLSON, T.N.; BRISSON, N. Simulation of diurnal transpiration and photosynthesis of a water stressed soybean crop. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v.81, n.1-2, p.41-59, 1996.
15. ORTEGA-FARIAS, S. A comparative evaluation of the residual energy balance, Penman, and Penman-Monteith estimates of daytime variation of evapotranspiration. 1993. 137f. PhD (Thesis), Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 1993.
16. ORTEGA-FARIAS, S. et al. Estimación de la evapotranspiration real diaria de un cultivo de tomates usando la ecuación de Penman-Monteith.. Ciencia Investigación Agraria, Santiago, v.27, n.2, p.91-96, 2000.
17. ORTEGA-FARIAS, S. et al. Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith model for estimating soybean evapotranspiration. Irrigation Science, Berlin, v.23, n.1, p.1-9, 2004.
18. ORTEGA-FARIAS, S.; ACEVEDO, C.; FUENTES, S. Calibration of the Penman-Monteith method to estimate latent heat flux over a grass canopy. Acta Horticulture, Leuven, v.537, n.1, p.129-133, 1999.
19. PEREZ, P. J. et al. Assessment of reliability of Bowen ratio method for partitioning fluxes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v.97, n.3, p.141-150, 1999.
20. RANA, G. et al. Validation of a model of actual evapotranspiration for water stressed soybeans. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v.86, n.3-4, p.215-224, 1997.
21. RANA, G.; KATERJI, N. A measurement based sensitivity analysis of the Penman-Monteith actual evapotranspiration model for crops of different height and in contrasting water status. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, Hamburgo, v.60, n. 1-4, p. 141-149, 1998.
22. RANA, G.; KATERJI, N.; PERNIOLA, M. Evapotranspiration of sweet sorghum: A general model and multilocal validity in semiarid environmental conditions. Water Resources Research, Washington, v.37, n.12, p.3237-3246, 2001.
23. REEVE, M.J.; CARTER A.D. Water release characteristic. In: SMITH K.A. et al. Soil analysis: physical methods. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991. p.111-160.
24. SAN JOSÉ, J.J. et al. Comparative energy exchange from cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) cvs. TC-9-6 and M-28-6-6) with differences in canopy architectures and growth durations at the Orinoco Ilanos. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v. 116, n.3-4, p.197-219, 2003.
25. TACONET, O. et al. Seasonal estimation of evaporation and stomatal conductance over a soybean field using surface IR temperatures. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Amsterdam, v.73, n.3-4, p.321-337, 1995.
26. TENNANT, D. A test of modified line intersects method of estimating root length. Journal of Ecology, Danvers, v.63, n.6, p.995-1001, 1975.
27. WILLMOTT, C.J. et al. Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models. Journal of Geophysical Research, Ottawa, v.90, n.5, p.8995-9005, 1985.