Laparoscopic vaginal delivery: Report of a case, literature review, and discussion

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 947-

  Schifrin, Barry S ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DELIVERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMOR; LAPAROSCOPY; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PREGNANCY;

DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PREGNANCY; WIT AND HUMOR;

EID: 33845562425     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00889-9     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Barham M. Laparoscopic vaginal delivery: Report of a case, literature review, and discussion. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:163-5.
2. Minimus D. The smaller the incision the bigger the ad. J Med Marketing 1938;9:26.
3. Will the cesarean section rate ever exceed 100%? J Obstet Pessimism 1966;1:2-4. Editorial.
4. Quality care 2000. I. The naught-naught cesarean section rate. Congressional Record. 2000.
5. LeBoyer C. Forceps I have known—A personal journey. 1955. Privately printed.
6. Kwikmoto K. The zen of suction. J Hydraulic Anatomy 1954;6:10-3.
7. Socrates J, Plato I. Rational decisions in obstetrics—A truly randomized, controlled, meta-analysis with suspiciously negative results. J Polemical Extractions. CDVI BC.
8. Delilah IB, Samson UB. Doing what you can for her HMO. Trans Med Accountability 1958;16:1123-5.