Why Do Rate-Equilibrium Relationships Break Down?

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 1982, Pages 1129-1130

  Pross, Addy ^a   Shaik, Sason S ^a  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845552803     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: 15205126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja00368a052     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Evans, M. G.; Polanyi, M. Trans. Faraday Soc. 1936, 32, 1340; 1938, 34, 11.
2. Leffler, J. E. Science (Washington, D.C.) 1953, 117, 340.
3. Leffler, J. E.; Grunwald, E. “Rates and Equilibria of Organic Reactions”; Wiley: New York, 1963; p 156.
4. Marcus, R. A. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1964, 15, 155.
5. Marcus, R. A. In “Special Topics in Electrochemistry”; Rock, P. A., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1977.
6. Strictly speaking, for bond-making and bond-breaking reactions, eq 2 is an approximation to Marcus' hyperbolic tangent equation. See eq 35 of: Marcus, R. A. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 891.
7. Bell, R. P. “The Proton in Chemistry”, 2nd ed.; Chapman and Hall: London, 1973.
8. Caldin, E., Gold, V., Eds. “Proton Transfer Reactions”; Chapman and Hall: London, 1975.
9. Albery, W. J.; Kreevoy, M. M. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1978, 16, 87.
10. Kreevoy, M. M.; Oh, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 4805.
11. Bordwell, F. G.; Boyle, W. J., Jr.; Hautala, J. A.; Yee, K. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 4002.
12. Bordwell, F. G.; Boyle, W. J., Jr.; Yee, K. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5926.
13. Bordwell, F. G.; Boyle, W. J., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 3907.
14. Bordwell, F. G., Bartmess, J. E.; Hautala, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 3107.
15. For various explanations of the anomalous α values, see: Agmon, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 2164.
16. More O'Ferrall, R. A. In “Proton Transfer Reactions”; Caldin, E., Gold, V., Eds.; Chapman and Hall: London, 1975.
17. Marcus, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 7224.
18. Kresge, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 3210
19. Can. J. Chem. 1974, 52, 1897.
20. Pross, A. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1977, 14, 69.
21. For a theoretical analysis, see: Shaik, S. J. am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 3692.
22. For recent reviews, see: Epiotis, N. D.; Shaik, S.; Zander, W. In “Rearrangements in Ground and Excited States”; De Mayo, P., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1980.
23. Epiotis, N. D.; Shaik, S. In “Progress in Theoretical Organic Chemistry”; Csizmadia, I. G., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1977; Vol. 2.
24. Epiotis, N. D. “Theory of Organic Reactions”; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 1978.
25. For a recent application to electron transfer and nucleophilic attack on peroxides, see: Walling, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 6854.
26. Pross, A.; Shaik, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 3702.
27. Pross, A.; Shaik, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., in press.
28. Pross, A., Shaik, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 103, 187.
29. Shaik, S. Nouv. J. Chim., in press.
30. Wolfe, S.; Mitchell, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc., in press.
31. Arnett, E. M.; Reich, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5892.
32. Arnett, E. M.; Petro, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 1468.
33. Wolfe, S.; Mitchell, D. J.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc., in press.
34. Kevill, D. N. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1981, 421.
35. McLennan, D. J.; Burton, G. W., private communication.
36. Murdoch, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 4410.