Multidimensional assessment of female tracheoesophageal prosthetic speech

Clinical Otolaryngology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 511-517

  Kazi, R ^a,b   Kiverniti, E ^a   Prasad, V ^a   Venkitaraman, R ^a   Nutting, C M ^a   Clarke, P ^a   Rhys Evans, P ^a   Harrington, K J ^a,b  

^a ROYAL MARSDEN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESOPHAGUS PROSTHESIS; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNGOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH ARTICULATION; UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON QUALITY OF LIFE SCORE; VOICE HANDICAP INDEX; VOWEL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FEMALE; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; LARYNGECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH, ALARYNGEAL; SPEECH, ESOPHAGEAL; TRACHEA; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 33845548951     PISSN: 03077772     EISSN: 13652273     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2006.01290.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Carding P.N., Steen I.N., Webb A. et al. (2004) Reliability and sensitivity to change of acoustic measures of voice quality. Clin. Otolaryngol. 29, 538-544
2. Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R. & Berke G.S. (1994) The multidimensional nature of pathologic vocal quality. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96, 1291-1301
3. Fourcin A.J. (1981) Laryngographic assessment of phonatory function. ASHA Rep. 11, 116-127
4. Bassich C.J. & Ludlow C. (1986) The use of perceptual methods by new clinicians for assessing voice quality. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 51, 125-133
5. Ringash J. & Bezjak A. (2001) A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 23, 201-213
6. Peter Rhys Evans P.Q. & Montgomery P.J. (2003) Gullane. Principles and Practice of Head and Neck Oncology. Martin Dunitz, UK
7. Kazi R., Singh A., De-Cordova J. et al. (2005) A new self-administered questionnaire to determine patient experience with voice prosthesis (Blom-Singer valves). J. Postgrad Med. 51, 253-258
8. Bellandese M., Lerman J. & Gilbert H. (2001) An acoustic analysis of excellent female esophageal, tracheoesophageal, and laryngeal speakers. J. Speech Lang. Hear. 44, 1315-1320
9. Qi B., Weinberg B. & Bi N. (1995) Enhancement of female esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 2461-2465
10. Trudeau M.D. & Qi Y.Y. (1990) Acoustic characteristics of female tracheoesophageal speech. J. Speech Hear. Disord. 55, 244-250
11. Van As C., Hilgers F., Verdonck-de Leeuw I. et al. (1998) Acoustical analysis and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice. J. Voice 12, 239-248
12. Ackerstaff A.H., Hilgers F.J.M., Aaron-son N.K. et al. (1994) Communication, functional disorders and life style changes after total laryngectomy. Clin. Otolaryngol. 9, 295-300
13. Op de Coul B.M., Hilgers F.M., Balm A.J. et al. (2000) A decade of postlaryngectomy vocal rehabilitation in 318 patients. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 126, 1320-1328
14. Blood G.W. (1984) Fundamental frequency and intensity measurements in laryngeal and alaryngeal speakers. J. Commun. Disord. 17, 319-324
15. Van As C. (2001) Tracheoesophageal Speech: A Multidimensional Assessment of Voice Quality. PhD Thesis. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
16. Dejonckere P.H. & Wieneke G.H. (1991) GRBAS-scaling of pathological voices: reliability, clinical relevance, and differentiated correlation with acoustic measurements, especially with spectral measurements. In Proceedings of the 22th World Congress IALP, 1992, Loebell E. (ed), IALP, Hannover
17. De Bodt M.S. (1997) A Framework for Voice Assessment: The Relation Between Subjective and Objective Parameters in the Judgment of Normal and Pathological Voice. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Antwerp, Antwerp
18. De Bodt M.S., Wuyts F.L., Van de Heyning P.H. et al. (1997) Test-retest study of the GRBAS Scale: the influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality. J. Voice 11, 74-80
19. Kreiman J., Gerratt B.R., Kempster G.B. et al. (1993) Perceptual evaluation of voice quality: review, tutorial, and a framework for future research. J. Speech Hear. Res. 36, 21-40
20. Van As C.J., Koopmans-van Beinum F.J. & Hilgers F.J. (2003) Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech by naïve and experienced judges through the use of semantic differential scales. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 46, 947-959
21. Hassan S.J. & Weymuller E.A. (1993) Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck 15, 485-496
22. Weymuller E.A., Yueh B., Deleyiannis F.W. et al. (2000) Quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: lessons learnt from 549 prospectively evaluated patients. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 126, 329-336
23. Vartanian J.G., Carvalho A.L., Yueh B. et al. (2004) Long-term quality of life evaluation after head and neck cancer treatment in a developing country. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 130, 1209-1213
24. Jacobson B.H., Johnson A., Grywalski C. et al. (1997) The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): development and validation. Ann. J. Speech Lang. Pathol. 6, 66-70
25. Schuster M., Lohscheller J., Hoppe U. et al. (2004) Voice handicap of laryngectomees with tracheoesophageal speech. Folia. Phoniatr. Logop. 56, 62-67