Consistency of location and gradient judgments of visually-interpolated contours

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Fulvio, Jacqueline M ^a   Singh, Manish ^b   Maloney, Laurence T ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSISTENCY OF LOCATION; PARTLY-OCCLUDED CONTOURS; REGION OF OCCLUSION;

INTERPOLATION; ITERATIVE METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; POLYNOMIALS;

CONTOUR MEASUREMENT;

EID: 33845544087     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2006.59     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. D.H. Brainard. The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10:433-436, 1997.
2. J.H. Elder and R.M. Goldberg. Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. Journal of Vision, 2(4):324-353, 2002.
3. C. Fantoni and W. Gerbino. Contour interpolation by vector-field combination. Journal of Vision, 3(4):281-303, 2003.
4. J. Feldman. Curvilinearity, covariance, and regularity in perceptual groups. Vision Research, 37:2835-2848, 1997.
5. D.J. Field, A. Hayes, and R.F. Hess. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local "association field." Vision Research, 33:173-193, 1993.
6. J. M. Fulvio and M. Singh. Surface geometry influences the shape of illusory contours. Acta Psychologica, in press.
7. W.S. Geisler, J.S. Perry, B.J. Super, and D.P. Gallogly. Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Research, 41(6):711-724, 2001.
8. P.J. Kellman, and T.F. Shipley. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23:141-221, 1991.
9. B. B. Kimia, I. Frankel, and A. Popescu. Euler spiral for shape completion. International Journal of Computer Vision, 54(1/2):157-180, 2003.
10. J. J. Koenderink. Pictorial relief. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A, 356: 1071-1086, 1998.
11. J. J. Koenderink, A. J. van Doom, and A. M. Kappers. Surface perception in pictures. Perception and Psychophysics, 52:487-496, 1992.
12. D. Mumford. Elastica and computer vision. In C. L. Bajaj, editor, Algebraic geometry and its applications, pages 491-506. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994.
13. D.G. Pelli. The Video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10:437-442, 1997.
14. M. Singh. Modal and amodal completion generate different shapes. Psychological Science, 15:454-459, 2004.
15. M. Singh and D.D. Huffman. Completing visual contours: The relationship between relatability and minimizing inflections. Perception and Psychophysics, 61:943-951, 1999.
16. M. Singh and J.M. Fulvio. Visual extrapolation of contour geometry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102:939-944, 2005.
17. S. Ullman. Filling-in the gaps: The shape of subjective contours and a model for their generation. Biological Cybernetics, 25:1-6, 1976.
18. P.A. Warren, L.T. Maloney, and M.S. Landy. Interpolating sampled contours in 3D: Analyses of variability and bias. Vision Research, 42:2431 -2446, 2002.
19. P.A. Warren, L.T. Maloney, and M.S. Landy. Interpolating sampled contours in 3D: perturbation analyses. Vision Research, 44:815-832, 2004.
20. M. Wertheimer. Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Psychologische Forschung, 4:301-350.
21. M. Wertheimer. Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 60: 321-378, 1912.
22. L. R. Williams and D. W. Jacobs. Stochastic completion fields: a neural model of illusory contour shape and salience. Neural Computation, 9:837-859, 1997.