Molecular phylogeny of the green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae)

Australian Journal of Entomology

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 235-243

  Winterton, Shaun ^a   De Freitas, Sérgio ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

16S; CAD; Chrysopidae; COI; Molecular systematics; Neuropterida

Indexed keywords

CHRYSOPIDAE; HEMEROBIIDAE; NEUROPTERA; NEUROPTERIDA; OSMYLIDAE; POLYSTOECHOTIDAE;

EID: 33845542475     PISSN: 13266756     EISSN: 14406055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2006.00537.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams PA. 1967. A review of the Mesochrysinae and Nothochrysinae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 135, 215-238.
2. Adams PA. 1982. Ceraeochrysa, a new genus of Chrysopinae (Neuroptera) (Studies in New World Chrysopidae, part I). Neuroptera International 2, 69-75.
3. Adams PA & Penny ND. 1986. Fauna relations of amazonian chrysopidae. In: Recent Research in Neuropterology, Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Neuropterology (eds J Gepp, H Aspöck & H Hölzel), pp. 119-124. Privately printed, Graz, Austria.
4. Adams PA & Penny ND. 1987. Neuroptera of the amazon basin, Part 11a. Introduction and chrysopini. Acta Amazonica 15, 413-479.
5. Aspöck U, Plant JD & Nemeschkal HL. 2001. Cladistic analysis of Neuroptera and their systematic position within Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola: Neuropterida: Neuroptera). Systematic Entomology 26, 73-86.
6. Brooks SJ. 1994. A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing, Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology Series 63, 137-210.
7. Brooks SJ. 1997. An overview of the current status of Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) systematics. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 44, 267-275.
8. Brooks SJ & Barnard PC. 1990. The green lacewings of the world: a generic review (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) 59, 117-286.
9. Caterino MS, Cho S & Sperling FAH. 2000. The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving Tower of Babel. Annual Review of Entomology 45, 1-54.
10. Chirgwin JM, Przybyla AE, MacDonald RJ & Rutter WJ. 1979. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry 18, 5294.
11. Cho S, Mitchell A, Regier JC et al. 1995. A highly conserved nuclear gene for low-level phylogenetics: elongation factor 1-alpha recovers morphology-based tree for heliothine moths. Molecular Biology and Evolution 12, 650-656.
12. Cunningham CW. 1997a. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Systematic Biology 46, 464-478.
13. Cunningham CW. 1997b. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14, 733-740.
14. Farris JS, Kallersjo M, Kluge AG & Bult C. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44, 570-572.
15. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
16. Freund JN & Jarry B. 1987. The rudimentary gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes four enzymic functions. Journal of Molecular Biology 193, 1-13.
17. Handlirsch A. 1906-1908. Die fossilen Insekten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
18. Haring E & Aspöck U. 2004. Phylogeny of the Neuropterida: a first molecular approach. Systematic Entomology 29, 415-430.
19. Hedin M & Maddison WP. 2001. A combined molecular approach to phylogeny of the jumping spider subfamily Dendryphantinae (Araneae: Salticidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 18, 386-403.
20. Hölzel H. 1970. Zur generischen Klassifikation der paläarktischen Chrysopinae. Eine neue Untergattungen der Chrysopidae (Planipennia). Zeitschrift der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Osterreichischer Entomologen 22, 44-52.
21. Horne PA, New TR & Papaceck D. 2001. Preliminary notes on Mallada signatus (Chrysopidae) as a predator in field crops in Australia. In: Lacewings in the Crop Environment (eds PK McEwan, TR New & AE Whittington), pp. 395-397. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
22. Johnson LA & Soltis DE. 1998. Assessing congruence: empirical examples from molecular data. In: Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing (eds DE Soltis, PS Soltis & JJ Doyle), pp. 297-343. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
23. Kimmins DE. 1952. A revision of the Apochrysinae (Fam. Chrysopidae). Annals and Magazine of Natural History 12, 929-944.
24. Lunt DH, Zhang D-X, Szymura JM & Hewitt GM. 1996. The insect cytochrome oxidase I gene: evolutionary patterns and conserved primers for phylogenetic studies. Insect Molecular Biology 5, 153-165.
25. MacLeod EG. 1964. A comparative morphological study of the head capsule and cervix of larval Neuroptera (Insecta). PhD Thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
26. Maddison D & Maddison W. 2000. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 4.03. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
27. Moulton JK & Wiegmann BM. 2004. Evolution and phylogenetic utility of CAD (rudimentary) among Mesozoic-aged eremoneuran Diptera (Insecta). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31, 363-378.
28. Navás L. 1910. Crisópidos nuevos. Brotéria 9, 38-59.
29. New TR. 1989. Planipennia, Lacewings. Handbuch der Zoologie, 4 (Arthropoda, Insecta). Teilband 30. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
30. Notredame C. 2001. Recent progresses in multiple sequence alignment: a survey. Pharmacogenomics 3, 131-144.
31. Principi MM. 1946. Contributi all studio dei Neuotteri italiani IV. Nothochrysa italica Rossi. Bollettino dell'Istituto di Entomologia della Univerisità degli Studi di Bologna 15, 85-102.
32. Senior LJ & McEwen PK. 2001. The use of lacewings in biological control. In: Lacewings in the Crop Environment (eds PK McEwan, TR New & AE Whittington), pp. 296-302. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
33. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenback A, Crespi B, Liu H & Flook P. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 651-701.
34. Sorenson MD. 1999. TreeRot, Version 2.0. Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
35. Swofford DL. 1999. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4.0 (and beta versions). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
36. Tauber CA, Tauber MJ & Albuquerque GS. 2001. Plesiochrysa brasiliensis (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): larzval stages, biology, and taxonomic relationships. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94, 858-865.
37. Tjeder B. 1966. Neuroptera-Planipennia 5. Family Chrysopidae. South African Animal Life 12, 228-534.
38. Winterton SL & Brooks SJ. 2002. Phylogeny of the apochrysine green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Apochrysinae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 95, 16-28.
39. Withycombe CL. 1925. Some aspects of the biology and morphology of the Neuroptera, with special reference to the immature stages and their possible phylogenetic significance. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1924, 303-411.