Staying outside the mainstream: An empirical study of standards choices

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 2002-January, Issue , 2002, Pages 3335-3343

  Karlsbjerg, J ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Communication industry; Communication standards; Communications technology; Computer science; Economic forecasting; Electronic mail; Measurement standards; Operating systems; Standards development; Standards organizations

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; ECONOMICS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; STANDARDS;

COMMUNICATION INDUSTRY; COMMUNICATION STANDARDS; COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY; ECONOMIC FORECASTING; MEASUREMENT STANDARDS; STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT;

COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845536537     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994421     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Besen, S.M. and J. Farrell, Choosing how to compete: strategies and tactics in standardization. Journal of economic perspectives, 1994. 8(2 - spring 1994): p. 117-131.
2. Rada, R., Consensus Versus Speed. Communications of the ACM, 1995. 38(10 (October)): p. 21-23.
3. David, P.A. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. in Papers and proceedings on the ninety-seventh annual meeting of the American economic association. 1984.
4. David, P.A. and S. Greenstein, The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Economics of innovation and new technology, 1990(1): p. 1-32.
5. Kindleberger, C.P., Standards as public, collective and private goods. KYKLOS - International review for social sciences, 1983. 36 (1983): p. 377-396.
6. Shapiro, C. and H.R. Varian, The art of standards wars. California Management Review, 1998.
7. Arthur, B.W., Positive feedbacks in the economy. Scientific American, 1990(February).
8. Liebowitz, S.J. and S.E. Margolis, Winners, Losers & Microsoft, Competition and antitrust in High Technology. 1999, Oakland, California: The independent institute.
9. Shapiro, C. and H.R. Varian, Information Rules: a strategic guide to the network economy. 1999, Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
10. David, P.A., Narrow windows, blind giants and angry orphans: The dynamics of systems rivalries and dilemmas of technology policy, in Technological Innovation Project - working paper no. 10. 1986.
11. Rolland, K.H. Challenging the Installed Base: Deploying a Large-scale IS in a Global Organization. in Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems. 2000. Wienna.
12. Hanseth, O., Information technology as infrastructure, in Department of Informatics. 1996, Göteborg University: Göteborg, Sweden.
13. Ciborra, C.U., et al., From Control to Drift - The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. 1 ed. Vol. 1. 2000, New York: Oxford University Press Inc. 246.
14. Hanseth, O. and K. Braa. Hunting for the treasure at the end of the rainbow: standardizing corporate IT infrastructure. in IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 - New Information Technologies in Organizational Processes: Field Studies and Theoretical Reflections on the Future of Work. 1999. St. Louis, MO: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
15. Bailey, J., L. McKnight, and P. Bosco, The economics of advanced services in an open communications infrastructure: transaction costs, production costs, and network externalities. Information Infrastructure and Policy, 1995. 4: p. 255-277.
16. Karlsbjerg, J. and C. Olsen, Implementation of Intranets (in Danish: Implementering af intranet), in Department of Computer Science. 1999, Aalborg University: Aalborg.
17. Mintzberg, H., Structure in fives - designing effective organizations. 1983: Prentice-Hall.
18. Monteiro, E. and V. Vepsø, Infrastructure strategy formation: seize the day at Statoil, in From control to drift. The dynamics of corporate information infrastructure, C. Ciborra, Editor. 2000, Oxford University Press: Oxford. p. 148-171.
19. Weiss, T.R., Corel, focusing on graphics market, posts small profit,. 2001, Computerworld.
20. Weiss, T.R., Corel says preliminary Q1 numbers show profitability,. 2001, Computerworld.