Social, demographic and situational characteristics associated with inconsistent use of oral contraceptives: Evidence from France

Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 190-196

  Moreau, Caroline ^a,b   Bouyer, Jean ^b   Gilbert, Fabien ^b   Bajos, Nathalie ^b   Ducot, Beatrice ^c   Ferrand, Michèle ^c   Hassoun, Danielle ^c   Job Spira, Nadine ^c   Kaminski, Monique ^c   Lelong, Nathalie ^c   Leridon, Henri ^c   Razafindratsima, Nicolas ^c   Rossier, Clementine ^c   Warszawski, Josiane ^c  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c INSERM ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DEMOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PHYSICIAN; PILL; PRESCRIPTION; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTIVES, ORAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 33845523362     PISSN: 15386341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1363/3819006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bajos N et al., Contraception: from accessibility to efficiency, Human Reproduction, 2003, 18(5):994-999.
2. Trussell J, Contraceptive failure in the United States, Contraception, 2004, 70(2):89-96.
3. Rosenberg M and Waugh MS, Causes and consequences of oral contraceptive noncompliance, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999, 180(2, pt. 2):276-279;
4. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Meehan TE, Use and misuse of oral contraceptives: risk indicators for poor pill taking and discontinuation, Contraception, 1995, 51(5):283-288;
5. Peterson LS et al., Women's efforts to prevent pregnancy: consistency of oral contraceptive use, Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 30(1):19-23;
6. and Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Burnhill MS, Compliance, counseling and satisfaction with oral contraceptives: a prospective evaluation, Family Planning Perspectives, 1998, 30(2):89-92 & 104.
7. Potter L et al., Measuring compliance among oral contraceptive users, Family Planning Perspectives, 1996, 28(4):154-158.
8. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Meehan TE, 1995, Contraception, op. cit. (see reference 3).
9. Rosenberg M and Waugh MS, 1999, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, op. cit. (see reference 3);
10. Peterson LS et al., 1998, Family Planning Perspectives, op. cit. (see reference 3);
11. and Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Burnhill MS, 1998, Family Planning Perspectives, op. cit. (see reference 3).
12. Hillard PJ, Oral contraception noncompliance: the extent of the problem, Advances in Contraception, 1992, 8(Suppl. 1):13-20;
13. Burkman RT, Oral contraceptives: current status, Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2001, 44(1):62-72;
14. and Peterson LS et al., 1998, Family Planning Perspectives, op. cit. (see reference 3).
15. Ingham R and Van Zessen G, Towards an alternative model of sexual behaviour: from individual properties to interactional processes, in: Van Campenhoudt L et al., eds., Sexual Interactions and HIV Risk: New Conceptual Perspectives in European Research, London: Taylor and Francis, 1997, pp. 83-89.
16. Free C, Ogden J and Lee R, Young women's contraception use as a contextual and dynamic behaviour: a qualitative study, Psychology and Health, 2005, 20(5):673-690;
17. Gold RS et al., Situational factors and thought processes associated with unprotected intercourse in heterosexual students, AIDS Care, 1992, 4(3):305-323;
18. and Hardon A and Ogden J, Condom use and contraception non use amongst 16-19 year olds: a within subjects comparison, Psychology and Health, 1999, 14(4):697-709.
19. Beckman LJ and Harvey SM, Factors affecting the consistent use of barrier methods of contraception, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996, 88(3 Suppl.):65S-71S.
20. Bajos N, Ferrand M and Équipe GINE, De la Contraception à l'Avortement: Sociologie des Grossesses non Prévues, Paris: Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 2002.
21. Bissell P, May CR and Noyce PR, From compliance to concordance: barriers to accomplishing a re-framed model of health care interactions, Social Science and Medicine, 2004, 58(4):851-862.
22. Moatti JP, Spire B and Duran S, Un bilan des recherches socio-comportementales sur l'observance des traitements dans l'infection à VIH: au delà des modèles biomédicaux?Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Santé Publique, 2000, 48(2):182-197.
23. Bajos N, Leridon H and Job-Spira N, Contraception and abortion in France in the 2000s: the COCON survey, Population, 2004, 59 (3/4):347-356.
24. Bajos N, Leridon H and Job-Spira N, Contraception and abortion in France in the 2000s: the COCON survey, Population, 2004, 59 (3/4):347-356. Ibid.
25. Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS), Stratégies de Choix des Méthodes Contraceptives chez la Femme, Paris: HAS, 2004, p. 234.
26. Bajos N, Leridon H and Job-Spira N, 2004, Population, op. cit. (see reference 14).
27. Hosmer DW and Lemeshow S, Applied Logistic Regression, New York: Wiley, 1989.
28. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Meehan TE, 1995, Contraception, op. cit. (see reference 3).
29. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Meehan TE, 1995, Contraception, Ibid.
30. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Burnhill MS, 1998, Family Planning Perspectives, op. cit. (see reference 3).
31. Oakley D et al., Oral contraceptive use and protective behavior after missed pills, Family Planning Perspectives, 1997, 29(6):277-279 & 287.
32. Rosenberg M and Waugh MS, 1999, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, op. cit. (see reference 3).
33. Rosenberg MJ et al., Compliance and oral contraceptives: a review, Contraception, 1995, 52(3):137-141;
34. Delbanco SF, Improving the use of contraceptives: the challenge continues, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996, 88(3 Suppl.):1S-3S;
35. Delbanco TL and Daley J, Through the patient's eyes: strategies toward more successful contraception, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996, 88(3 Suppl.):41S-47S;
36. Branden PS, Contraceptive choice and patient compliance: the health care provider's challenge, Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, 1998, 43(6):471-482;
37. Burkman RT, Compliance and other issues in contraception, International Journal of Fertility and Women's Medicine, 1999, 44(5):234-240;
38. Isaacs JN and Creinin MD, Miscommunication between healthcare providers and patients may result in unplanned pregnancies, Contraception, 2003, 68(5):373-376;
39. and Rosenberg M and Waugh MS, 1999, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, op. cit. (see reference 3).
40. Branden PS, 1998, Journal of Nurse-Midwifery, op. cit. (see reference 24);
41. Burkman RT, 1999, International Journal of Fertility and Women's Medicine, op. cit. (see reference 24).
42. Bajos N, Ferrand M and Équipe GINE, 2002, De la Contraception à l'Avortement: Sociologie des Grossesses Non Prévues, op. cit. (see reference 11).
43. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Meehan TE, 1995, Contraception, op. cit. (see reference 3).
44. Oakley D et al., Combining qualitative with quantitative approaches to study contraceptive pill use, Journal of Women's Health, 1999, 8(2):249-257.
45. Toulemon L and Leridon H, Maitrise de la fécondité et appartenance sociale: contraception, grossesses accidentelles et avortements, Population, 1992, 47(1):1-46.
46. Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Meehan TE, 1995, Contraception, op. cit. (see reference 3);
47. and Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS and Burnhill MS, 1998, Family Planning Perspectives, op. cit. (see reference 3)
48. Aggleton P et al., Risking everything, risk behavior, behavior change, and AIDS, Science, 1994, 265(5170):341-345.