Comparison of distance measures for historical spelling variants

IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

Volumn 217, Issue , 2006, Pages 295-304

  Kempken, S ^a   Luther, W ^a   Pilz, T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTANCE MEASURE; FULL-TEXT SEARCH ENGINES; INTERDISCIPLINARY PROJECT; MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS; RULE BASED; TEXT DATABASE; TEXT DOCUMENT;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; SEARCH ENGINES;

COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES;

EID: 33845518851     PISSN: 15715736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-34747-9_31     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. D. Archer, A. Ernst-Gerlach, S. Kempken S, T. Pilz, and P. Rayson, The identification of spelling variants in English and German historical texts: Manual or automatic?, proposed for Digital Humanities 2006, July 4-9, Paris, France.
2. R. Baeza-Yates, B. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval, Addison-Wesley, 2000.
3. D. Biella, W. Luther, T. Pilz, A web-based system for assisted literature research, Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on e-Learning 2004, Nov. 25-26, Paris, France.
4. Bibliotheca Augustana, FH Augsburg; http://www.fh-augsburg.de/~harsch/ augustana.html (accessed 05 Jan. 2006)
5. Deutsch Diachron Digital; http://www.deutschdiachrondigital.designato.de (accessed 05 Jan. 2006)
6. K. Erikson, Approximate Swedish Name Matching - Survey and Test of Different Algorithms, Nada report TRITA-NA-E9721, 1997.
7. Excalibur; http://www.eg.bucknell.edu/~excalibr/excalibur.html (accessed 05 Jan. 2006)
8. documentArchiv.de; http://www.documentarchiv.de (accessed 05 Jan. 2006)
9. T. Gadd, PHONIX: The Algorithm, Program: Automated Library and Information Systems 24(4): Pp. 363-366 (1990).
10. Hessisches Staatsarchiv Darmstadt; http://www.stad.hessen.de/ DigitalesArchiv/anfang.html (accessed 05 Jan. 2005)
11. S. Hockey, Living with Google: Perspectives on Humanities Computing and Digital Libraries, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 20: Pp. 7-24 (2004).
12. S. Kempken, Bewertung von historischen und regionalen Schreibvarianten mit Hilfe von Abstandsmaßen, Thesis, Universität Duisburg-Essen (2005).
13. D. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 3: Searching and Sorting, Addison-Wesley, pp. 391-392 (1973).
14. V. Levenshtein, Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions and reversals, Soviet Physics Doklady, 10 (8): Pp. 707-710 (1966).
15. L. Mischke, W. Luther, Document Image De-Warping Based on Detection of Distorted Text Lines, in: Fabio Roll, Sergio Vitulano (eds.), Image Analysis and Processing - ICIAP 2005 proceedings, Cagliari, Italy, September 2005, LNCS 3617, Springer, pp. 1068-1075.
16. T. Pilz, Unscharfe Suche in Textdatenbanken mit nichtstandardisierter Rechtschreibung am Beispiel von Frakturtexten zur Nietzsche-Rezeption, Thesis (civil service examination), Universität Duisburg-Essen (2003).
17. T. Pilz, W. Luther, N. Fuhr, U. Ammon, Rule-based search in text databases with nonstandard orthography. Proceedings ACH/ALLC 2005, June 15-18 Victoria, Canada.
18. P. Rayson, D. Archer, N. Smith, VARD versus Word: A comparison of the UCREL variant detector and modern spell checkers on English historical corpora, Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2005 conference, July 14-17, Birmingham, UK.
19. E. Ristad, P. Yianilos, Learning String Edit Distance, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Recognition and Machine Intelligence 20 (5), pp. 522-532 (1998).
20. R. Wagner, J. Fischer, The String-to-String Correction Problem, Journal of the ACM 21 (1), pp. 168-173 (1974).
21. J. Zobel, P. Dart, Phonetic String Matching: Lessons from Information Retrieval, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 166-172 (1996).