Is cultural heritage really important for tourists? A contingent rating study

Applied Economics

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 261-271

  Cuccia, Tiziana ^a   Cellini, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; CULTURAL HERITAGE; HERITAGE TOURISM; TOURIST DESTINATION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; ITALY; SICILY; SOUTHERN EUROPE;

EID: 33845518314     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840500427981     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alberini, A and Riganti, P and Longo, A. (2003) Can people value the aesthetic and use services of urban sites? Evidence from a survey of belfast residents Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, pp. 193-213.
2. Alvarez-Farizo, B and Hanley, N and Barberan, N. (2001) The value of leisure time: A contingent rating approach Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44, pp. 681-99.
3. Arrow, KJ and Solow, R and Leamer, E and Portney, P and Radner, R and Schuman, H. (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation Federal Register, 58, pp. 4601-14.
4. Barreiro, J and Sanchez, M and Viladrich Grau, M. (2005) How muach are people willing to pay for silente? A contingent valuation study Applied Economics, 37, pp. 1233-46.
5. Boniface, P and Fowler, PJ. (1993) Heritage and Tourism in the Global Village. London: Routlegde.
6. Borgonovi, F. (2004) Performing arts attendance: An economic approach Applied Economics, 36, pp. 1871-85.
7. Carmone, FJ and Green, PE and Jain, AK. (1978) The robustness of cojoint analysis: Some Monte Carlo results Journal of Marketing Research, 15, pp. 300-03.
8. Caserta, S and Russo, AP. (2002) More means worse: Asymmetric information, spatial displacement and sustainable heritage tourism Journal of Cultural Economics, 26, pp. 245-60.
9. Carroll, JD and Green, PE. (1995) Psychometric models in marketing research: Part I, conjoint analysis Journal of Marketing Research, 32, pp. 385-91.
10. Cattin, P and Wittink, DR. (1982) Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey Journal of Marketing, 46, pp. 44-53.
11. Cellini, R and Cuccia, T and Reale, A. (2004) Patrimonio culturale e turismo: Un'indagine empirica su Siracusa Economia Pubblica, 34, pp. 113-31.
12. Cuccia, T. (2003) The contingent valuation in cultural economics. In Handbook of Cultural Economics. (pp. 119-31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13. Cuccia, T and Signorello, G.(2002) Methods for measuring the demand for the arts and heritage: Theoretical issues. In The Economics of Heritage. (pp. 119-46). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
14. Diamond, PA and Hausman, JA. (1996) Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 45-64.
15. Green, PE and Rao, V. (1971) Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data Journal of Marketing Research, 8, pp. 355-63.
16. Green, PE and Krieger, AM.(1997) Using conjoint analysis to view competitive interaction through the customer's eyes. In Wharton on Dynamic Competitive Strategy. New York: John Wiley.
17. Green, PE and Srinivasan, V. (1978) Conjoint analysis in consumer research, issues and outlook Journal of Consumer Research, 5, pp. 103-23.
18. Green, PE and Srinivasan, V. (1990) Conjoint analysis in marketing research, new developments and directions Journal of Marketing, 54, pp. 3-19.
19. Green, PE and Wind, J and Rao, V. (1985) Conjoint analysis: Methods and applications Marketing of Technical, 12, pp. 65-71.
20. Hanemann, WM. (1984) Welfare evaluation in contingent valutation experiments with discrete responses American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, pp. 322-41.
21. Hanley, N and Mourato, S and Wright, RE. (2001) Choice modelling approaches: A superior alternative for environmental valuation? Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, pp. 435-62.
22. Luce, RD and Tukey, JW. (1964) Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, pp. 1-27.
23. Mackenzie, J. (1993) A comparison of contingent preference models American Journal of Agricultural Eocnomics, 75, pp. 593-603.
24. Maddala, GS. (1984) Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Mazzanti, M. (2003) Valuing cultural heritage in a multi-attribute farmework: Microeconomic perspectives and policy implications Journal of Socio Economics, 30, pp. 584-604.
26. Mc Connell, KE. (1990) Models for referendum data: The structure of discrete choice models for contingent valuation Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, pp. 19-34.
27. Mitchell, RC and Carson, RT. (1990) Research for the Future. In Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington DC 2nd
28. Narayan, PK. (2005) The structure od tourist expenditure in Fiji: evidence from unit root structural break tests Applied Economics, 37, pp. 1157-61.
29. Pavlova, M and Groot, W and Van Merode, G. (2004) Willigness and ability of bulgarian consumers to pay for improved public health care services Applied Economics, 36, pp. 1117-30.
30. Prentice, R. (1994) Interpretative provision at heritage sites. In Tourism: The State of The Art. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
31. Rizzo, I and Towse, R. (2002) The Economics of Heritage. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. (Eds)
32. Roe, B and Boyle, KJ and Teisl, MF. (1996) Using conjoint analysis to derive estimates of compensating variation Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, pp. 145-59.
33. Sanz, JA and Herrero, RC and Bedate, AM. (2003) Contingent valuation and semiparametric methods: A case study of the national museum of sculpture in valladolid, Spain Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, pp. 241-57.
34. Swarbrooke, JS. (1993) The future of heritage attractions Insight, 93, pp. D15-D20.
35. Swarbrooke, JS. (1994) Heritage tourism into the 21st century. In Tourism: The State of The Art. New York: John Wiley & Sons.