Bayesian estimation of smooth parameter maps for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images with block-ICM

Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Volumn 2006, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Michael Kelm, B ^a   Mueller, Natalie ^a   Menze, Bjoern H ^a   Hamprecht, Fred A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED (DCE); ITERATED CONDITIONAL MODES (ICM); MEAN SQUARE ERROR (MSE); NONLINEAR LEAST SQUARES (NLLS) PROBLEM;

LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MARKOV PROCESSES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

CONFORMAL MAPPING;

EID: 33845517632     PISSN: 10636919     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2006.41     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. N. Balram and J. M. F. Moura. Noncausal Gauss-Markov random fields: Parameter structure and estimation. IEEE Trans Inf Theory, 39(4):1333-1355, July 1993
2. J. E. Besag. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems (with discussion). J Roy Statist Soc Ser B, 36:192-236, 1974.
3. C. Bouman and K. Sauer. A generalized Gaussian image model for edge-preserving MAP estimation. IEEE Trans Image Proc, 2(3):296-310, July 1993
4. G. Brix, M. Henze, M. Knopp, R. Lucht, J. Doll, H. Junkermann, H. Hawighorst, and U. Haberkorn. Comparison of pharmacokinetic MRI and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer: initial experience. Eur Radiol, 11(10):2058-70, 2001
5. G. Brix, W. Semmler, R. Port, L. Schad, G. Layer, and W. Lorenz. Pharmacokinetic parameters in CNS Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 15(4):621-8, 1991
6. T. Coleman and Y. Li. An interior, trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds. SIAM Jon Optim, 6:418-445, 1996
7. H. Hawighorst, M. Libicher, M. Knopp, T. Moehler, G. Kauffmann, and G. Kaick. Evaluation of angiogenesis and perfusion of bone marrow lesions: role of semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging, 10(3):286-94, Sep 1999.
8. P. J. Huber. Robust Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc., 1981
9. F. Kiessling, M. Lichy, R. Grobholz, M. Heilmann, N. Farhan, M. S. Michel, L. Trojan, J. Ederle, U. Abel, H.-U. Kauczor, W. Semmler, and S. Delorme. Simple models improve the discrimination of prostate cancers from the peripheral gland by T1-weighted dynamic MRI. Eur Radiol, 14(10): 1793-801, Oct 2004.
10. T. W. Nattkemper and A. Wismüller. Tumor feature visualization with unsupervised learning. Med Image Anal, 9(4):344-51, Aug 2005
11. H.-P. Schlemmer, J. Merkle, R. Grobholz, T. Jaeger, M. S. Michel, A. Werner, J. Rabe, and G. van Kaick. Can pre-operative contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for prostate cancer predict microvessel density in prostatectomy specimens? Eur Radiol, 14(2):309-17, Feb 2004.
12. P. Tofts, G. Brix, D. Buckley, J. Evelhoch, E. Henderson, M. Knopp, H. Larsson, T. Lee, N. Mayr, G. Parker, R. Port, J. Taylor, and R. Weisskoff. Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imag, 10(3):223-32, Sep 1999.
13. T. Twellmann, O. Lichte, and T. W. Nattkemper. An adaptive tissue characterization network for model-free visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 24(10): 1256-66, Oct 2005.
14. G. Winkler. Image Analysis, Random Fields and Dynamic Monte Carlo Methods, volume 27 of Applications of Mathematics. Springer, 2nd edition, 2003.
15. C. Zechmann, K. Baudendistel, K. Aftab, L. Trojan, M.-S. Michel, H.-U. Kauczor, and S. Delorme. Dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI combined with MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with prostate cancer - initial experience. In Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med, volume 13, 2005.