Development and validation of the revised Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life for Rheumatoid Arthritis Instrument

Arthritis Care and Research

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 856-863

  Chiou, C F ^a,b   Sherbourne, C D ^c   Cornelio, I ^a   Lubeck, D P ^a   Paulus, H E ^d   Dylan, M ^b,g   Chang, C H ^e   Weisman, M H ^f  

^a AMGEN INC   (United States)

^b CERNER CORPORATION   (United States)

^c RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g Cerner Health Insights   (United States)

Author keywords

Instrument validation; Quality of life; Rheumatoid arthritis

Indexed keywords

RECOMBINANT INTERLEUKIN 1 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; FATIGUE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN; PHASE 4 CLINICAL TRIAL; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVISED CEDARS SINAI HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS INSTRUMENT; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SHORT FORM 36; WELLBEING;

ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33845511367     PISSN: 21514658     EISSN: 15290131     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/art.22090     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Weisman MH, Paulus HD, Russak SM, Lubeck DP, Chiou CF, Sengupta N, et al. Development of a new instrument for rheumatoid arthritis: the Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life Instrument (CSHQ-RA). Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:78-84.
2. Russak SM, Sherbourne CD, Lubeck DP, Paulus HD, Chiou CF, Sengupta N, et al. Validation of a rheumatoid arthritis health-related quality of life instrument, the CSHQ-RA. Arthritis Rheum 2003;49:798-803.
3. Patrick DL, Chiang YP. Measurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: conceptual and methodological challenges. Med Care 2000;38 Suppl:II14-25.
4. Chiou CF, Sherbourne CD, Ofman J, Lee M, Lubeck DP, Paulus HE, et al. Development and validation of Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CSHQ-RA) short form instrument. Arthritis Rheum 2004;51:358-64.
5. Chiou CF, Sherbourne CD, Cornelio I, Lubeck DP, Paulus HE, Dylan M, et al. Revalidation of the original Cedars-Sinai Health-Related Quality of Life in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CSHQ-RA) short form instrument. J Rheum 2006;33:256-62.
6. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
7. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
8. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielson and Lydiche; 1960.
9. Andrich D. A binomial latent trait model for the study of Likert-style attitude questionnaires. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1978;31:84-98.
10. Andrich D. A rating formulation for ordered response categories. Psychometrika 1978;43:561-73.
11. Andrich D. Application of a psychometric rating model to ordered categories which are scored with successive integers. Appl Psychol Meas 1978;2:581-94.
12. Andrich D. Scaling attitude items constructed and scored in the Likert tradition. Educ Psychol Meas 1978;38:665-80.
13. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
14. Wells GA, Tugwell P, Kraag GR, Baker PR, Groh J, Redelmeier DA. Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient's perspective. J Rheumatol 1993;20:557-60.
15. Greenwood MC, Doyle DV, Ensor M. Does the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire have potential as a monitoring tool for subjects with rheumatoid arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:344-8.
16. Guzman J, Maetzel A, Peloso P, Yeung M, Bombardier C. Disability scores in DMARD trials: what is a clinically important change? [abstract]. Arthritis Rheum 1996;39 Suppl 9:S208.
17. Scientific Advisory Committee: instrument review criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bulletin I-IV. Waltham (MA): Medical Outcomes Trust; 1995.
18. Brunner HI, Klein-Gitelman MS, Miller MJ, Barron A, Baldwin N, Trombley M, et al. Minimal clinically important differences of the childhood health assessment questionnaire. J Rheumatol 2005;32:150-61.
19. Kosinski M, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya S, Osterhaus JT, Ware JE Jr. Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:1478-87.