Shrunken p-values for assessing differential expression with applications to genomic data analysis

Biometrics

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1099-1106

  Ghosh, Debashis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Hypothesis testing; James Stein estimator; Microarray; Multiple comparisons; Shrinkage estimators; Simultaneous inference

Indexed keywords

DISEASES; GENE EXPRESSION; STATISTICAL TESTS;

FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; GENOMIC DATA; HIGH THROUGHPUT TECHNOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; JAMES-STEIN ESTIMATORS; MULTIPLE COMPARISON; MULTIPLE TESTING; P-VALUES; SHRINKAGE ESTIMATOR; SIMULTANEOUS INFERENCE;

DECISION THEORY;

DECISION ANALYSIS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOMICS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ARTICLE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL GENETICS; PROSTATE CANCER; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 33845495923     PISSN: 0006341X     EISSN: 15410420     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00616.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57, 289-300.
2. Benjamini, Y. and Liu, W. (1999). A step-down multiple hypothesis testing procedure that controls the false discovery rate under independence. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 82, 163-170.
3. Benjamini, Y. and Yekutieli, D. (2001). The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics 29, 1165-1188.
4. Berger, J. (1985). Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Bickel, D. R. (2004). Error-rate and decision-theoretic methods of multiple testing: Which genes have high objective probabilities of differential expression? Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 3, 8.
6. Cleveland, W. S. and Devlin, S. J. (1988). Locally-weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 596-610.
7. Dalmasso, C., Broët, P., and Moreau, T. (2005). A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate. Bioinformatics 21, 660-668.
8. Dhanasekaran, S. M., Barrette, T. R., Ghosh, D., Shah, R., Varambally, S., Kurachi, K., Pienta, K. J., Rubin, M. A., and Chinnaiyan, A. M. (2001). Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature 412, 822-826.
9. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R., Storey, J. D., and Tusher, V. (2001). Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 1151-1160.
10. Ge, Y., Dudoit, S., and Speed, T. P. (2003). Resampling-based multiple testing for microarray data analysis (with discussion). Test 12, 1-77.
11. Gelman, A. and Tuerlinckx, F. (2000). Type S error rates for classical and Bayesian single and multiple comparison procedures. Computational Statistics 15, 373-390.
12. Genovese, C. and Wasserman, L. (2004). A stochastic approach to false discovery control. Annals of Statistics 32, 1035-1061.
13. George, E. I. (1986). Minimax multiple shrinkage estimation. Annals of Statistics 14, 188-205.
14. Hwang, J. T., Casella, G., Robert, C., Wells, M. T., and Farrell, R. H. (1990). Estimation of accuracy in testing. Annals of Statistics 20, 490-509.
15. Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H. A., and Meyer, R. F. C. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley.
16. Müller, P., Parmigiani, G., Robert, C. P., and Rousseau, J. (2004). Optimal sample size for multiple testing: The case of gene expression microarrays. Journal of the American Statistical Association 468, 990-1001.
17. Pounds, S. and Cheng, C. (2004). Improving false discovery rate estimation. Bioinformatics 20, 1737-1745.
18. Sarkar, S. K. (2002). Some results on false discovery rates in multiple testing procedures. Annals of Statistics 30, 239-257.
19. Storey, J. D. (2002). A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 64, 479-498.
20. Storey, J. D. (2003). The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Annals of Statistics 31, 2013-2035.
21. Storey, J. D. and Tibshirani, R. (2003). Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 9440-9445.
22. Storey, J. D., Taylor, J. E., and Siegmund, D. (2004). Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: A unified approach. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 66, 187-205.
23. van der Laan, M. J., Dudoit, S., and Pollard, K. S. (2004). Augmentation procedures for control of the generalized family-wise error rate and tail probabilities for the proportion of false positives. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 3, 15.