Natural variation in macroinvertebrate assemblages and the development of a biological banding system for interpreting bioassessment data - A preliminary evaluation using data from upland sites in the south-western Cape, South Africa

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 575, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 231-244

  Dallas, Helen F ^a   Day, Jenny A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Bioassessment; Biological bands; Biotic indices; Reference condition; SASS; South African Scoring System; Spatial variability

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY; DATA REDUCTION; POSITIVE IONS; SODIUM;

BIOASSESSMENT DATA; BIOLOGICAL BANDING SYSTEM; BIOLOGICAL BANDS; CATION RATIO; GEOMORPHOLOGICAL ZONATION; MACROINVERTEBRATE ASSEMBLAGES; REFERENCE CONDITION; SOUTH AFRICAN SCORING SYSTEM (SASS);

NATURAL SCIENCES COMPUTING;

BIOASSAY; MACROINVERTEBRATE; MOUNTAIN STREAM; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SPATIAL VARIATION; UPLAND REGION;

AFRICA; SOUTH AFRICA; SOUTHERN AFRICA; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;

EID: 33845491086     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-006-0374-y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Armitage, P. D., D. Moss, J. F. Wright & M. T. Furse, 1983. The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Research 17: 333-347.
2. Brown, C. A., 1997. Modelling and managing the effects of trout farms on Cape rivers. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, Zoology Department, University of Cape Town, South Africa, 175 pp.
3. Chutter F. M., 1998. Research on the Rapid Biological Assessment of Water Quality Impacts in Streams and Rivers. Water Research Commission Report No 422/1/98. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa, 230 pp.
4. Cooper, S. D., 1984 The effects of trout on water strider in stream pools. Oecologia 63: 376-379.
5. Cooper, S. D., L. Barmuta, O. Sarnelle, K. Kratz & S. Diehl, 1997. Quantifying spatial heterogeneity in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(1): 174-188.
6. Crowl, T. A., C. R. Townsend, N. Bouwes & H. Thomas, 1997. Scales and causes of patchiness in stream invertebrate assemblages: top-down predator effects. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(1): 277-285.
7. Dallas, H. F., 2002. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in lotic systems: implications for defining reference conditions for riverine macroinvertebrates. Water Research Commission Report No.KV138/03, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, 218 pp.
8. Dallas, H. F., 2004. Seasonal variability of macroinvertebrate assemblages in two regions of South Africa: implications for aquatic bioassessment. African Journal of Aquatic Science 29(2): 173-184.
9. Dallas, H. F., In Press. The influence of biotope availability on macroinvertebrate assemblages in South African rivers: implications for aquatic bioassessment. Freshwater Biology.
10. Davies, B. R. & J. A. Day, 1998. Vanishing Waters. University of Cape Town Press, South Africa. .
11. Furse, M. T., 2000. The application of RIVPACS procedures in headwater streams - an extensive and important natural resource. In Wright, J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques Freshwater Biological Association, United Kingdom.
12. Golterman, H. I., Clymo, R. S. & M. A. M Ohnstad, 1978. Methods for Chemical and Physical Analysis of Fresh Waters. IBP Handbook No. 8. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, United Kingdom.
13. Harrison, A. D. & J. D. Agnew, 1962. The distribution of invertebrates endemic to acid streams in the Western and Southern Cape Province. Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums II, CSIR Reprint No. RW 121, Pretoria, South Africa.
14. Hawkins, C. P., J. N. Hogue, L. M. Decker & J. W. Feminella, 1997. Channel morphology, water temperature, and assemblage structure of stream insects. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(4): 728-749.
15. King, J. M. & D. M. Schael, 2001. Assessing the Ecological Relevance of a Spatially-nested Geomorphological Hierarchy for River Management. Water Research Commission Report 754/1/01. Pretoria, South Africa.
16. Low, A.B. & A. G. Rebelo, 1996. Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Department of Environmental Affairs & Tourism, Pretoria, South Africa.
17. Palmer, C., A. Palmer, J. O'keeffe & R. Palmer, 1994. Macroinvertebrate community structure and altitudinal changes in the upper reaches of a warm, temperate southern African river. Freshwater Biology 32: 337-347.
18. Palmer, M. A. & N. L. Poff, 1997. Heterogeneity in streams: the influence of environmental heterogeneity on patterns and processes in streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16(1): 169-173.
19. Parsons, M. & R. H. Norris, 1996. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model. Freshwater Biology 36: 419-434.
20. Poff, N. L. & J. V. Ward, 1990. Physical habitat template of lotic systems: recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Environmental Management 14(5): 629-645.
21. Primer, 1999. Version 5. Plymouth Marine Laboratory, United Kingdom.
22. Pringle, C. M., R. J. Naiman, G. Bretchko, J. R. Karr, M. W. Oswood, J. R. Webster, R. L. Welcome & M. J. Winterbourn, 1988. Patch dynamics in lotic systems: the stream as a mosaic. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 503-524.
23. Rowntree, K. M. & R. A. Wadeson, 1999. A Hierarchical Geomorphological Model for the Classification of Selected South African Rivers. Water Research Commission Report No. 497/1/99. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
24. Simpson, J. C. & R. H. Norris, 2000. Biological assessment of river quality: developments of AUSRIVAS models and outputs. In Wright J. F., D. W. Sutcliffe & M. T. Furse (eds), Assessing the Biological Quality of Fresh Waters: RIVPACS and Other Techniques Freshwater Biological Association, United Kingdom.
25. Smith, M. J., W. R. Kay, D. H. D. Edward, P. J. Papas, K. J. Richardson,.J. C. Simpson, A. M. Pinder, D. J. Cale, P. H. J. Howitz, J. A. Davis, F. H. Yung, R. H. Norris & S. A. Halse, 1999. AusRiVAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia. Freshwater Biology 41(2): 269-282.
26. Snaddon, C. D. & B. R. Davies, 1998. A preliminary assessment of the effects of a small inter-basin transfer of water on discharge and invertebrate community structure. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 14: 421-441.
27. Stevens, D. M. & M. D. Picker, 1999. A revision of Aphanicercella Tillyard (Plecoptera: Notonemouridae) including the A. barnardii (Tillyard) species-complex. African Entomology 7: 197-209.
28. Stewart, B. A. & C. L. Griffiths, 2001. Amphipods. In Day J. A., B. A. Stewart, I. J. De Moor & A. E. Louw (eds), Guides to the Freshwater Invertebrates of Southern Africa, Vol. 4, Crustaceae III. Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa.
29. Townsend, C. R., S. Doledec & M. R. Scarsbrook, 1997. Species traits in relation to temporal and spatial heterogeneity in streams: a test of habitat templet theory. Freshwater Biology 37: 367-387.
30. Vegter J. R., 1995. Geology Map of South Africa with Simplified Lithostratigraphy for Geohydrological Use. Water Research Commission TT 74/95, Pretoria, South Africa.
31. Wishart, M. J. & J. A. Day, 2002. Endemism in the freshwater fauna of the south-western Cape, South Africa. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung fur Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 28: 1-5.