Treatment Outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study After One Year of Follow-up

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 143, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 22.e2-

  Gedde, Steven ^a   Anderson, Douglas ^a   Budenz, Donald ^a   Del Calvo, Madeline ^a   Fantes, Francisco ^a   Greenfield, David ^a   Hodapp, Elizabeth ^a   Lee, Richard ^a   Marcellino, Alexia ^a   Palmberg, Paul ^a   Parrish II, Richard ^a   Herndon, Leon ^b   Challa, Pratap ^b   Santiago Turla, Cecile ^b   WuDunn, Darrell ^c   Emerick, Geoffrey ^d   Heuer, Dale ^e,r   Kent, Alexander ^f   Bradham, Carol ^f   Langdale, Lisa ^f   Barton, Keith ^g   Amalfitano, Francesca ^g   Rai, Poornima ^g   Sidoti, Paul ^h   Gedal, Amy ^h   Luayon, James ^h   Ovase, Roma ^h   Tai, Katy ^h   Nguyen, Quang ⁱ   Miller, Neva ⁱ   Shields, Steven ^j   Anderson, Kevin ^j   Moya, Frank ^j   Brandt, James ^k   Lim, Michele ^k   Sponzo, Marilyn ^k   Sherwood, Mark ^l   Burke, Revonda ^l   Skuta, Gregory ^m   Jobson, Jason ^m   Ogilbee, Lisa ^m   Reynolds, Adam ^m   Varma, Rohit ⁿ   Francis, Brian ⁿ   Walonker, Frances ⁿ   Feldman, Robert ^o   Baker, Laura ^o   Bell, Nicholas ^o   Carranza, JoLene ^o   Espinoza, Athena ^o   Prum, Bruce ^p   Beall, Janis ^p   Perkins, Todd ^q   Kaufman, Paul ^q   Perkins, Tracy ^q   Soderling, Barbara ^q   Feuer, William ^a   Londono, Luz ^a   Schiffman, Joyce ^a   Chen, Philip ^r   Singh, Kuldev ^r   Spaeth, George ^r   Wright, Martha ^r   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d LOYOLA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^f MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^g MOORFIELDS EYE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h NEW YORK EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

ⁱ SCRIPPS CLINIC   (United States)

^j SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^m UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^o UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^p UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^q UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^r NONE

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIGLAUCOMA AGENT; MITOMYCIN C;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; GLAUCOMA DRAINAGE IMPLANT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SHUNTING; TRABECULECTOMY; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 33845486717     PISSN: 00029394     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.020     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Chen P.P., Yamamoto T., Sawada A., et al. Use of antifibrosis agents and glaucoma drainage devices in the American and Japanese Glaucoma Societies. J Glaucoma 6 (1997) 192-196
2. Joshi A.B., Parrish R.K., and Feuer W.F. 2002 Survey of the American Glaucoma Society. Practice preferences for glaucoma surgery and antifibrotic use. J Glaucoma 14 (2005) 172-174
3. Schwartz A.L., and Anderson D.R. Trabecular surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 92 (1974) 134-138
4. Inaba Z. Long-term results of trabeculectomy in the Japanese: an analysis by life-table method. Jpn J Ophthalmol 26 (1982) 361-373
5. Shirato S., Kitazawa Y., and Mishima S. A critical analysis of the trabeculectomy results by a prospective follow-up design. Jpn J Ophthalmol 26 (1982) 468-480
6. Broadway D.C., Grierson I., and Hitchings R.A. Local effects of previous conjunctival incisional surgery and the subsequent outcome of filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 125 (1998) 805-818
7. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group. Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study one-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 108 (1989) 625-635
8. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group. Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study three-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 115 (1993) 82-92
9. The Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study Group. Five-year follow-up of the Fluorouracil Filtering Surgery Study. Am J Ophthalmol 121 (1996) 349-366
10. Minckler D.S., Heuer D.K., Hasty B., et al. Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology 95 (1988) 1181-1188
11. Freedman J., and Rubin B. Molteno implants as a treatment for refractory glaucoma in black patients. Arch Ophthalmol 109 (1991) 1417-1420
12. Lloyd M.A., Sedlak T., Heuer D.K., et al. Clinical experience with the single plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Update of a pilot study. Ophthalmology 99 (1992) 679-687
13. Heuer D.K., Lloyd M.A., Abrams D.A., et al. Which is better? One or two? A randomized clinical trial of single-plate versus double-plate Molteno implantation for glaucomas in aphakia and pseudophakia. Ophthalmology 99 (1992) 1512-1519
14. Hodkin M.J., Goldblatt W.S., Burgoyne C.F., et al. Early clinical experience with the Baerveldt implant in complicated glaucomas. Am J Ophthalmol 120 (1995) 32-40
15. Mills R.P., Reynolds A., Emond M.J., et al. Long-term survival of Molteno glaucoma drainage devices. Ophthalmology 103 (1996) 299-305
16. Huang M.C., Netland P.A., Coleman A.L., et al. Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol 127 (1999) 27-33
17. Broadway D.C., Iester M., Schulzer M., and Douglas G.R. Survival analysis for success for Molteno tube implants. Br J Ophthalmol 85 (2001) 689-695
18. Roy S., Ravinet E., and Mermoud A. Baerveldt implant in refractory glaucoma: long-term results and factors influencing outcomes. Int Ophthalmol 24 (2001) 93-100
19. Heuer D.K., Parrish R.K., Gressel M.G., et al. 5-fluorouracil and glaucoma filtering surgery: II. A pilot study. Ophthalmology 91 (1984) 384-394
20. Heuer D.K., Parrish R.K., Gressel M.G., et al. 5-fluorouracil and glaucoma filtering surgery: III. Intermediate follow-up of a pilot study. Ophthalmology 93 (1986) 1537-1546
21. Weinreb R.N. Adjusting the dose of 5-fluorouracil after filtration surgery to minimize side effects. Ophthalmology 94 (1987) 564-570
22. Palmer S.S. Mitomycin C as adjunct chemotherapy with trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 98 (1991) 317-321
23. Prata J.A., Minckler D.S., Baerveldt G., et al. Trabeculectomy in pseudophakic patients: postoperative 5-fluorouracil versus intraoperative mitomycin C antiproliferative therapy. Ophthalmic Surg 26 (1995) 73-77
24. Chen C.W., Huang H.T., Bair J.S., and Lee C.C. Trabeculectomy with simultaneous topical application of mitomycin C in refractory glaucoma. J Ocul Pharmacol 6 (1990) 175-182
25. Singh J., O'Brien C., and Chawla H.B. Success rate and complications of intraoperative 0.2 mg/ml mitomycin C in trabeculectomy surgery. Eye 9 (1995) 460-466
26. Andreanos D., Georgopoulos G.T., Vergados J., et al. Clinical evaluation of the effect of mitomycin C in re-operation for primary open angle glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 7 (1997) 49-54
27. You Y.A., Gu Y.S., Fang C.T., and Ma X.Q. Long-term effects of simultaneous and subscleral mitomycin C application in repeat trabeculectomy. J Glaucoma 11 (2002) 110-118
28. Nguyen Q.H., Budenz D.L., and Parrish R.K. Complications of Baerveldt glaucoma drainage implants. Arch Ophthalmol 116 (1998) 571-575
29. Gedde S.J., Schiffman J.C., Feuer W.J., et al. The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study: Design and baseline characteristics of study patients. Am J Ophthalmol 140 (2005) 275-287
30. O'Brien P.C., and Fleming T.R. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 35 (1979) 549-556
31. Trible J.R., and Brown D.B. Occlusive ligature and standardized fenestration of a Baerveldt tube with and without antimetabolites for early postoperative intraocular pressure control. Ophthalmology 105 (1998) 2243-2250
32. Emerick G.T., Gedde S.J., and Budenz D.L. Tube fenestrations in Baerveldt glaucoma implant surgery: 1-year results compared with standard implant surgery. J Glaucoma 11 (2002) 340-346
33. Shah A.A., WuDunn D., and Cantor L.B. Shunt revision versus additional tube shunt implantation after failed tube shunt surgery in refractory glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 129 (2000) 455-460
34. Godfrey D.G., Krishna R., Greenfield D.S., et al. Implantation of second glaucoma drainage devices after failure of primary devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 33 (2002) 37-43
35. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 11. Risk factors for failure of trabeculectomy and argon laser trabeculoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 134 (2002) 481-498
36. 2 Baerveldt glaucoma implants. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 621-626
37. Wilson M.R., Mendis U., Smith S.D., and Paliwal A. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant vs trabeculectomy in the surgical treatment of glaucoma: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol 130 (2000) 267-273
38. Wilson M.R., Mendis U., Paliwal A., and Haynatzka V. Long-term follow-up of primary glaucoma surgery with Ahmed glaucoma valve implant vs trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 136 (2003) 464-470
39. Tsai J.C., Johnson C.C., and Dietrich M.S. The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma: a single-surgeon comparison of outcome. Ophthalmology 110 (2003) 1814-1821
40. Wang J.C., See J.L., and Chew P.T. Experience with the use of Baerveldt and Ahmed glaucoma drainage implants in an Asian population. Ophthalmology 111 (2004) 1383-1388
41. Syed H.M., Law S.K., Nam S.H., et al. Baerveldt-350 implant vs Ahmed valve for refractory glaucoma: a case-controlled comparison. J Glaucoma 13 (2004) 38-45
42. Smith M.F., Doyle J.W., and Sherwood M.B. Comparison of the Baerveldt glaucoma implant with the double-plate Molteno drainage implant. Arch Ophthalmol 113 (1995) 444-447
43. Ayyala R.S., Zurakowski D., Monshizadeh R., et al. Comparison of double-plate Molteno and Ahmed glaucoma valve in patients with advanced uncontrolled glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 33 (2002) 94-101
44. Lichter P.R., Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W., et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology 108 (2001) 1943-1953
45. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol 130 (2000) 429-440
46. Heijl A., Leske M.C., Bengtsson B., et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 120 (2002) 1268-1279
47. Hylton C., Congdon N., Friedman D., et al. Cataract after glaucoma filtration surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 135 (2003) 231-232
48. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am J Ophthalmol 126 (1998) 487-497
49. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 6. Effect of cataract on visual field and visual acuity. Arch Ophthalmol 118 (2000) 1639-1652
50. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 8. Risk of cataract formation after trabeculectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 119 (2001) 1771-1779
51. Costa V.P., Smith M., Spaeth G.L., et al. Loss of visual acuity after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 100 (1993) 599-612
52. Cheung J.C., Wright M.M., Murali S., and Pederson J.E. Intermediate-term outcome of variable dose mitomycin C filtering surgery. Ophthalmology 104 (1997) 143-149
53. Assaad M.H., Baerveldt G., and Rockwood E.J. Glaucoma drainage devices: pros and cons. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 10 (1999) 147-153