Analysis of the significance of diverse procedures of multicriterion aggregation;Analyse de la signifiance de diverses procédures d'agrégation multicritère

INFOR

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 191-215

  Martel, Jean Marc ^a   Roy, Bernard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845486359     PISSN: 03155986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03155986.2006.11732748     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bana e Costa C.A., Vansnick J.C. (1994), «MACBETH - An interactive path towards the construction of cardinal value functions», International Transactions in Operations Research 1, 4, 489-500.
2. Bana e Costa C.A., Vansnick J.C. (1997), «A theoretical framework for measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique (MACBETH)», in J. Climaco (ed.): Multicriteria Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 15-24.
3. Bana e Costa C.A., Vansnick J.C. (2001), «Une critique de base de l'approche de Saaty : mise en question de la méthode de la valeur propre maximale», Université Paris-Dauphine, Cahier du LAMSADE no 175.
4. Barzilai J. (1998), «Measurement Foundations for Preference Function Modelling», IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, San Diego, California, October 1998.
5. Bouyssou D., Roy B. (1987), «La notion de seuils de discrimination en analyse multicrière», INFOR, Vol. 25, 4, 302-313.
6. Bouyssou D., Marchant T., Pirlot M., Perny P., Tsoukiàs A., Vincke, Ph., (2000), Evaluation and Decision models - A critical perspective, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000.
7. Brans J.P., Vincke Ph. (1985), «A preference ranking organization method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making», Management Science, Vol. 31, 647-656.
8. Campbell N.R. (1938), «Symposium: Measurement and its importance for philosophy», Proc. Arist. Soc. Suppl., Vol. 17, 121-142. London: Harrison.
9. Edwards W. (1977), «How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decisionmaking», IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-7, 5, 326-340.
10. Falmagne J.C., Narens L. (1983), «Scales and Meaningfulness of Qualitative Laws», Synthese, Vol. 55, 287-325.
11. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. (1981), Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications - A state-of-the-art survey, Springer-Verlag.
12. Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. (1976), Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
13. Maystre L.Y., Pictet J., Simos J. (1994), Méthodes multicritères ELECTRE, Presse Polytechnique et Universitaire Romandes, Lausanne.
14. McCord M., de Neufville, R. (1982), «Empirical demonstration that expected utility decision analysis is not operational», in Stigum and Wenstop (eds.), Foundations of utility and risk theory, D. Reidel, Dordrescht, 181-199.
15. Rebai A., Martel J.M. (2001), «Que doit-on attendre d'une procédure d'agrègation multicritère pour des évaluations non cardinales ou mixtes», INFOR, Vol. 39, 1, 51-63.
16. Roberts P.S. (1979), Measurement theory, Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications (Vol. 7): Mathematics and the social sciences, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
17. Roberts F.S., Franke C.H. (1976), «On the theory of uniqueness in measurement» Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 14, 211-218.
18. Roy B. (1969), «Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples : La méthode ELECTRE», RIRO, Vol. 2, 57-75.
19. Roy B. (1978), «Un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples», Cahier du Centre d'Etudes de Recherche Opérationnelle, Vol. 20, 3-24.
20. Roy B. (1987), «Meaning and validity of interactive procedures as tools for decision making», European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 31, 297-303.
21. Roy B. (1993), «Decision science or decision-aid science?», European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.66, 2, 184-203.
22. Roy B. (1999), «Decision-aiding today: What should we expect?», in Tomas Gal, Theodor J. Stewart, Thomas Hanne (eds.), Multicriteria Decision Making - Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1.1-1.35.
23. Roy B. (2001), «L'aide à la decision aujourd'hui: que devrait-on en attendre?», dans Albert David, Armand Hatchuel, Romain Laufer (eds.), Les nouvelles fondations des sciences de gestion. Éditions Vuibert. Collection FNEGE, 145-179.
24. Roy B., Bouyssou D (1993), Aide Multicritére á la Décision : Méthodes et Cas, Collection Gestion, Economica. Paris.
25. Roy B., Mousseau V. (1996), «A theoretical framework for analysing the notion of relative importance of criteria», Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 5, 145-159.
26. Russel B. (1938), Principles of Mathematics, Second edition. New York: Norton.
27. Saaty T.L. (1977), «A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures», Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, 234-281.
28. Saaty T.L. (1984), Decider face á la complexité - Une approche analytique multicritère d'aide à la décision, EME, Paris.
29. Stevens S.S. (1946), «On the theory of scales of measurement», Science, Vol. 103, 677-680.
30. Stevens S.S. (1951), «Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics», Handbook of Experimental Psychology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1-49.
31. Suppes P. (1959), «Measurement empirical meaningfulness and three-valued logic», in Churchman and Ratoosh (eds.), Measurement: Definition and Theories, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 129-143.
32. Suppes, P., Zinnes J. (1963), «Basic measurement theory», in Luce, Bush & Galanter (Eds), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol. 1, 1-76, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
33. Vansnick J.C. (1991), «Measurement theory and decision aid» in Bana e costa (Ed.), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, 81-100.
34. Vincke Ph. (1989), L'aide multicritère á la décision, Éditions Ellipses (France) et Éditions de l'Université de Bruxelles (Belgique).
35. Von Winterfield, D., Edwards, W. (1986), Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press, New York.