Patients with Barrett's esophagus perceive their risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma as low

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 26-30

  Kruijshaar, Michelle E ^a   Siersema, Peter D ^a   Janssens, A Cecile J W ^a   Kerkhof, Marjon ^a   Steyerberg, Ewout W ^a   Essink Bot, Marie Louise ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CANCER RISK; ESOPHAGEAL ADENOCARCINOMA; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; FEMALE; FLOW CYTOMETRY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; ENDOSCOPY, GASTROINTESTINAL; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 33845475650     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.05.030     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Shaheen N.J., Crosby M.A., Bozymski E.M., et al. Is there publication bias in the reporting of cancer risk in Barrett's esophagus?. Gastroenterology 119 (2000) 333-338
2. Spechler S.J. Managing Barrett's oesophagus. Br Med J 326 (2003) 892-894
3. Chang J.T., and Katzka D.A. Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Arch Intern Med 164 (2004) 1482-1488
4. Craanen M.E., Blok P., Meijer G.A., et al. Surveillance in Barrett's oesophagus: a critical reappraisal. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 236 (2002) 4-8
5. Tytgat G.N., Van Sandick J.W., Lanschot J.J., et al. Role of surveillance in intestinal metaplasia of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg 27 (2003) 1021-1025
6. Sampliner R.E. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 97 (2002) 1888-1895
7. Shaheen N.J., Green B., Medapalli R.K., et al. The perception of cancer risk in patients with prevalent Barrett's esophagus enrolled in an endoscopic surveillance program. Gastroenterology 129 (2005) 429-436
8. Hopwood P., Shenton A., Lalloo F., et al. Risk perception and cancer worry: an exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Genet 38 (2001) 139
9. van Dooren S., Rijnsburger A.J., Seynaeve C., et al. Psychological distress in women at increased risk for breast cancer: the role of risk perception. Eur J Cancer 40 (2004) 2056-2063
10. Katapodi M.C., Lee K.A., Facione N.C., et al. Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review. Prev Med 38 (2004) 388-402
11. Ajzen I., and Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting behaviour (1980), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ)
12. Becker M.H., and Maiman L.A. Sociobehavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Med Care 13 (1975) 10-24
13. McCaul K.D., Branstetter A.D., Schroeder D.M., et al. What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review. Health Psychol 15 (1996) 423-429
14. Vernon S.W. Risk perception and risk communication for cancer screening behaviors: a review. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25 (1999) 101-119
15. Kruijshaar ME, Kerkhof M, Siersema PD, et al. The burden of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus. 2006. In press.
16. Weinstein N.D. What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25 (1999) 15-20
17. Woloshin S., Schwartz L.M., Black W.C., et al. Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: how you ask matters. Med Decis Making 19 (1999) 221-229
18. Diefenbach M.A., Weinstein N.D., and O'Reilly J. Scales for assessing perceptions of health hazard susceptibility. Health Educ Res 8 (1993) 181-192
19. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16 (1990) 199-208
20. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37 (1996) 53-72
21. Croyle R.T., and Lerman C. Risk communication in genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25 (1999) 59-66
22. Schapira M.M., Davids S.L., McAuliffe T.L., et al. Agreement between scales in the measurement of breast cancer risk perceptions. Risk Anal 24 (2004) 665-673
23. Tversky A., and Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Biases in judgements reveal some heuristics of thinking under uncertainty. Science 185 (1974) 1124-1131
24. Black W.C., Nease Jr. R.F., and Tosteson A.N. Perceptions of breast cancer risk and screening effectiveness in women younger than 50 years of age. J Natl Cancer Inst 87 (1995) 720-731
25. Rimer B.K., Briss P.A., Zeller P.K., et al. Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening?. Cancer 101 (2004) 1214-1228