Poisoning the well

Argumentation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 273-307

  Walton, D N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

ad hominem; Argumentation schemes; Bias; Commitment; Fallacy; Personal attack; Position to know argument; Silencing an opponent; Strategic maneuvering

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845463874     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-006-9013-z     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. Copi, I. M. and C. Cohen: 1998, Introduction to Logic, ed. 10 Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
2. Correspondence (no author given): Mr. Kingsley and Dr. Newman - A Correspondence on the Question Whether Dr. Newman Teaches that Truth is no Virtue, London, Longman, Green, Longman, Roberts and Green, 1864. Available at: http://www.newmanreader.org/works/apologia/correspondence.html.
3. Damer, E. D.: 1980, Attacking Faulty Reasoning, Wadsworth, Belmont.
4. Davis, W. A.: 1986, An Introduction to Logic, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
5. Garver, E.; 1994, Aristotle's Rhetoric: An Art of Character, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
6. Hurley, P. J.: 2003, A Concise Introduction to Logic, ed. 8 Wadsworth, Belmont, California.
7. Johnstone, H. W. Jr.: 1959, Philosophy and Argument, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, Pennsylvania.
8. Johnstone, H. W. Jr.: 1978, Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument, The Dialogue Press of Man and World, University Park, Pennsylvania.
9. Johnstone, H. W. Jr: 1981, Toward an Ethics of Rhetoric, Communication 6, 305-314
10. Krabbe, E. C. W. and D. N. Walton: 1993, It's All Very Well for you to Talk: Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks, Informal Logic 15, 79-91.
11. Layman, S. C..: 2000, The Power of Logic, Mayfield Publishing Co, Mountain View California.
12. Moore, B. N. and R. Parker: 2001, Critical Thinking, ed. 6 Mayfield Publishing Co, Mountain View, California.
13. Newman, J. H.: 1864, Apologia Pro Vita Sua, Longman, Green, London.
14. Reed, C. and G. Rowe: 'Araucaria: Software for Puzzles in Argument Diagramming and XML', Technical Report, Department of Applied Computing, University of Dundee, 2002. Available at: http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/ staff/creed/araucaria/.
15. van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Communicative Discussions, Foris, Dordrecht.
16. van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N. J.
17. van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 2004, A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. van Eemeren, F. H. and P. Houtlosser: 2002, 'Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance', in F. H. van Eemeren and P. Houtlosser (eds.). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis, Dordrecht, Kluwer, 2002.
19. Walton, D.: 1987, Informal Fallacies: Towards a Theory of Argument Criticisms, John Benjamins Publishing Co, Amsterdam.
20. Walton, D.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa and London.
21. Walton, D.: 1998, Ad Hominem Arguments, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.
22. Walton, D.: 2002, Legal Argumentation and Evidence, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.
23. Walton, D. and Krabbe, E.C.W.: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue, State University of New York Press, Albany.