The influence of distance on registration in ISO-C-3D navigation: A source of error in ISO-C-3D navigation

Technology and Health Care

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 473-478

  Citak, M ^a   Kendoff, D ^a   Wanich, T ^b   Pearle, A ^b   Singhai, R ^c   Krettek, C ^a   Hufner T ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^c SULTAN QABOOS HOSPITAL   (Oman)

Author keywords

Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery; Iso C 3D navigation; Precision; Reference base; Registration

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED NAVIGATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LONG BONE; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PELVIS SURGERY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTRATION; STANDARD; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL ERROR;

EID: 33845462890     PISSN: 09287329     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/thc-2006-14602     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. H.R. Abbasi et al., Clinical fluoroscopic fiducial-based registration of the vertebral body in spinal neuronavigation, Stud Health Technol Inform 81 (2001), 1-7.
2. K.C. Anderson, K.C. Buehler and D.C. Markel, Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods, J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3) (2005), 132-138.
3. M. Arand, L. Kinzl and F. Gebhard, Sources of error and risks in CT based navigation, Orthopade 31(4) (2002), 378-384.
4. E. Euler et al., C-arm-based three-dimensional navigation: a preliminary feasibility study, Comput Aided Surg 8(1) (2003), 35-41.
5. F. Gebhard et al., Navigation at the spine, Injury 35(Suppl 1) (2004), S-A35-45.
6. P.A. Grutzner et al., Computer-assisted screw osteosynthesis of the posterior pelvic ring. Initial experiences with an image reconstruction based optoelectronic navigation system, Unfallchirurg 105(3) (2002), 254-260.
7. R.G. Haaker et al., Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res 433 (2005), 152-159.
8. T. Hufner et al., Computer assisted pelvic surgery: registration based on a modified external fixator, Comput Aided Surg 8(4) (2003), 192-197.
9. T. Hufner et al., Accuracy study of computer-assisted drilling: the effect of bone density, drill bit characteristics, and use of a mechanical guide, J Orthop Trauma 19(5) (2005), 317-322.
10. B.M. Jolles, P. Genoud and P. Hoffmeyer, Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement, Clin Orthop Relat Res 426 (2004), 174-179.
11. D. Kendoff et al., Navigated Iso-C(3D)-based percutaneous osteoid osteoma resection: A preliminary clinical report, Comput Aided Surg 10(3) (2005), 157-163.
12. C. Krettek, F. Gebhard and T. Hufner, The current status of navigation systems, Unfallchirurg 106(11) (2003), 897-898.
13. P. Messmer et al., Modality-based navigation, Injury 35(Suppl 1) (2004), S-A24-29.
14. L.P. Nolte and T. Beutler, Basic principles of CAOS, Injury 35(Suppl 1) (2004), S-A6-16.
15. J.A. Ohnsorge, M. Weisskopf and C.H. Siebert, epiDRB - a new minimally invasive concept for referencing in the field of computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery, Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 143(3) (2005), 316-312.
16. P.P. Pott, H.P. Scharf and M.L. Schwarz, Today's state of the art in surgical robotics*, Comput Aided Surg 10(2) (2005), 101-132.
17. D. Ritter, M. Mitschke and R. Graumann, Markerless Navigation with the Intra-Operative Imaging Modality SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D, Electromedica 70(1) (2002).
18. K.Wendl et al., Iso-C(3D0-assisted) navigated implantation of pedicle screws in thoracic lumbar vertebrae, Unfallchirurg 106(11) (2003), 907-913.