Post-Kyoto CO2 emission reduction: The soft landing scenario analysed with POLES and other world models

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 786-796

  Russ, Peter ^a   Criqui, Patrick ^b  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b CNRS/LEPII EPE   (France)

Author keywords

Energy outlook; Model comparison; Post Kyoto targets

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY POLICY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EMISSION REDUCTION; EMISSION TRAJECTORY; ENERGY OUTLOOK; MODEL COMPARISON;

GAS EMISSIONS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; KYOTO PROTOCOL;

EID: 33845460796     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.010     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Banuri, T., Göran-Mäler, K., Grubb, M., Jakobson, H.K., Yamin, F., 1996. Equity and social considerations. In: Bruce, J.P., Hoesung, L, Haites, E.F. (Eds.), Climate Change 1995. Contribution of Working Group III to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 83-124.
2. Blanchard O., Criqui P., Trommetter M., and Viguier L. Au-delà de Kyoto: Enjeux d'équité et d'efficacité dans la négociation sur le changement climatique. Economie et Prévision 143-144 2-3 (2000) 15-35
3. Blanchard, O., Criqui, P., Trommetter, M., Viguier, L., 2001. Equity and efficiency in climate change negotiations: a scenario for world emission entitlements by 2030. Cahier de Recherche no 26, IEPE, Grenoble.
4. Böhringer, C., 2001. Climate politics from Kyoto to Bonn: from little to nothing, Discussion Paper No. 01-49. Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung, Mannheim.
5. 2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model. Energy Policy October 27, 585-601.
6. Criqui, P., Russ, P., Debye, D., 2006. Impacts of multi-gas strategies for greenhouse gas emission abatement: insights from a partial equilibrium model, to be published in Special Issue on EMF-21, Energy Journal.
7. Das, A., et al., 2006. ACROPOLIS: an Example of International Collaboration in the Field of Energy Modelling to Support Greenhouse Gases Mitigation Policies, Energy Policy, this issue, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.004.
8. ENERDATA, 2004. World Energy Database, Gieres, Grenoble, France.
9. Energy Journal, Special issue, 1999. The costs of the Kyoto Protocol: a multi-model evaluation.
10. European Commission, 1996. POLES 2.2, European Commission DG XII, EUR 17358 EN, 1996.
11. European Commission, 2003a. World Energy, Technology and Climate Policy Outlook 2030 (WETO). European Commission, DG RTD, EUR 20366 EN, 2003.
12. European Commission, 2003b. Greenhouse gas reduction pathways-In the UNFCC process up to 2025, Report for the European Commission DG ENV, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/pdf/pm_techreport2025.pdf
13. European Council, 1996. 1939th Council meeting (ENVIRONMENT), Luxembourg, 25 June 1996, Community strategy on climate change-Council conclusions, paragraph 6.
14. Gusbin D., Klaassen G., and Kouvaritakis N. Costs of ceiling on Kyoto flexibility. Energy Policy 27 (1999) 833-844
15. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2001. Climate Change 2001:Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Rose A., Stevens B., Edmonds J., and Wise M. International equity and differentiation in global warming policy. Environmental and Resource Economics 12 (1998) 25-51
17. Russ P. The role of accelerated power generation technology development to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Energy & Environment 15 (2004) 159-173
18. Russ, P., Ciscar, J.C., Szabó, L., 2005. Analysis of Post-2012 Climate Policy Scenarios with Limited Participation. Technical Report EUR 21758 EN.
19. UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). 2001. Greenhouse Gas Market Perspectives: Trade and Investment Implications of the Climate Change Regime. UNCTAD/DIT/TED/Misc.9. New York and Geneva.
20. 2 concentrations. Nature 379 6562 (1996) 240-243
21. Wigley, T.M.L., Raper, S.C.B., Hulme, M., Smith, S., 2000. The MAGICC/SCENGEN Climate Scenario Generator: Version 2.4, Technical Manual, Climatic Research Unit, UEA, Norwich, UK.