A hybrid computational fluid dynamics procedure for sonic boom prediction

Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2006, Pages 954-965

  Laflin, Kelly R ^a   Klausmeyer, Steven M ^a,b   Chaffin, Mark ^a,b  

^a CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY   (United States)

^b AIAA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA ACQUISITION; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; PRESSURE EFFECTS; WIND TUNNELS;

FLOW FIELDS; PRESSURE FIELDS; SONIC BOOM PREDICTION; STRUCTURED MESHES;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 33845457205     PISSN: 10485953     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-3168     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Pawlowski, J.W., et al, "Origins and Overview of the Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration Program," AIAA 2005-0005.
2. George, A.R., and Seebass, R., "Sonic Boom Minimization Including Both Front and Rear Shock Waves," AIAA J., Vol. 10, No. 10, pp. 2091-2093, 1969.
3. Darden, C.M., "Sonic-Boom Minimization with Nose-Bluntness Relaxation," NASA TP-1348, Jan. 1979.
4. Carlson, H.W., and Maglieri, D.J., "Review of Sonic-Boom Generation Theory and Prediction Methods," Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 51, No. 2, Part 3, pp. 675-685, 1972.
5. McLean, F.E., "Some Nonasymptotic Effects on the Sonic Boom of Large Airplanes," NASA TN D-2877, 1965.
6. Jones, L.B., "Lower Bounds for Sonic Bang in the Far Field," Aeronautical Quarterly, Vol. XVIII, pp. 1-21, 1967.
7. Graham, D., Dahlin, J., Meredith, K., and Vadnais, J., "Aerodynamic Design of Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration Aircraft," AIAA 2005-0008.
8. Meredith, K., et al, "Computational Fluid Dynamics Comparison and Flight Test Measurement of F-5E Off-Body Pressures," AIAA 2005-0006.
9. Morgenstern, J., et al, "F-5 Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator's Persistence of Boom Shaping Reduction through Turbulence," AIAA 2005-00012.
10. Lee-Rausch, B., et al, "Application of Parallel Adjoint-Based Error Estimation and Anisotropic Grid Adaptation for Three-Dimensional Aerospace Configurations," AIAA 2005-4842.
11. Kandil, O. and Ozcer, I.A., "Sonic Boom Computations for Double-Cone Configuration Using CFL3D, FUN3D and Full-Potential Codes," AIAA 2006-0414.
12. Anon., ICEM CFD Engineering Meshing Tutorial Manual, ICEM CFD Engineering, Berkeley, California, 2002.
13. Maviplis, D. and Levy, D.W., "Transonic Drag Prediction Using an Unstructured Multigrid Solver," NASA/CR-2002-211455, ICASE Report No. 2002-5, 2002.
14. Laflin, K.R., and Klausmeyer, S.M., "A Fast and Simple Solution-Resolution Assessment for Improved CFD Predictions," AIAA 2005-1218.
15. Anon., Tecplot 10 User's Manuel, Amtec Engineering, Inc., Bellevue, Washington., 2003.
16. Krist, S., Biedron, R., and Rumsey, C., "CFL3D User's Manual (Version 5.0)," NASA TM-1998-208444, 1998.
17. homas, C.L., "Extrapolation of Sonic Boom Pressure Signatures by the Waveform Parameter Method," NASA TN D-6832, June 1972.
18. Plotkin, K.J., and Grandi, F., "Computer Models for Sonic Boom Analysis: PCBoom4, CABoom, BooMap, CORBoom," Wyle Report WR 02-11, June 2002.
19. Page, J.A., and Plotkin, K.J., "An Efficient Method for Incorporating Computational Fluid Dynamics Into Sonic Boom Prediction," AIAA 1991-3275.
20. Haering, E.A., Murray, J.E., Purifoy, D.D., Graham, D.H., Meredith, K.B., Ashburn, C.E., Stucky, M., "Airborne Shaped Boom Demonstration Pressure Measurements with Computational Fluid Dynamics Comparisons," AIAA 2005-0009.
21. Mack, R.J., and Kuhn, N., "Determination of Extrapolation Distance With Measured Pressure Signatures From Two Low-Boom Models," NASA TM-2004-213264, Nov. 2004.
22. Benson, R. and McRae, D.S., "A three-dimensional dynamic solution adaptive mesh algorithm," AIAA 90-1566.