Relationship between masculinity-femininity and concession in an experimental collaborative eyewitness testimony

Asian Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 132-139

  Hirokawa, Kumi ^a,d   Matsuno, Eriko ^b   Mori, Kazuo ^c   Ukita, Jun ^b  

^a GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KWANSEI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c SHINSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Eyewitness testimony; Masculinity and femininity; Self confidence; Suggestibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845455743     PISSN: 13672223     EISSN: 1467839X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2006.00190.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andersson, J. & Rönnberg, J. R. (1995). Recall suffers from collaboration: Joint recall effects of friendship and task complexity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 199-211.
2. Asch, S. E. (1952). Effects of group pressure on the modification and distortion of judgments. In: G. E. Swanson, T. M. New-comb & E. L. Hartley, eds. Readings in Social Psychology, 2nd edn, pp. 2-11. New York: Holt.
3. Azmita, M. (1988). Peer interaction and problem solving: When are two heads better than one. Child Development, 59, 87-96.
4. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryer, S. & Thomas, R. L. III (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does group participation disrupt retrieval? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1176-1189.
5. Beck, D. & Black, K. (1991). Redefining research relationships: Two heads are better than one. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 37, 133-140.
6. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
7. Berger, J., Fisek, H., Norman, R. & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status Characteristics and Social Interaction. New York: Elsevier.
8. Berlinger, D. & Casanova, U. (1988). When are two heads better than one? Instructor, 98, 22-23.
9. Bond, R. & Smith, P. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch's (1952, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111-137.
10. Bondi, E. F. (1982). Two heads are better than one: Tutoring makes the difference. Academic Therapy, 17, 401-405.
11. Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A. & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.
12. Fruzzetti, A. E., Tolland, K., Teller, S. A. & Loftus, E. F. (1992). Memory and eyewitness testimony. In: M. M. Gruneberg & P. E. Morris, eds. Aspects of Memory, Vol. I, The Practical Aspects, pp. 18-50. London: Routledge.
13. Gruneberg, M. M. & Sykes, R. N. (1993). The generalisability of confidence-accuracy studies in eyewitnessing. Memory, 1, 185-189.
14. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1983). Suggestibility, intelligence, memory recall and personality: An experimental study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 35-37.
15. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1988). Interrogative suggestibility: Its relationship with assertiveness, social-evaluative anxiety, state anxiety and method of coping. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 159-166.
16. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1990). The relationship of intellectual skills to suggestibility, compliance and acquiescence. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 227-231.
17. Gudjonsson, G. H. & Clark, N. K. (1986). Suggestibility in police interrogation: A social psychological model. Social Behavior, 1, 83-104.
18. Ito, Y. (1978). Evaluation of sex-roles as a function of sex and role expectation. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 1-11 (in Japanese).
19. Kanematsu, H., Mori, K. & Mori, H. (1996/2003). Memory distortion in eyewitness pairs who observed nonconforming events and discussed them. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 3, 29-40 (in Japanese)
20. (an English version is available in Journal of the Faculty of Education, Shinshu University, No. 109, 75-84, 2003).
21. Liebman, J. I., McKinley-Pace, M. J., Leonard, A. M., et al (2002). Cognitive and psychosocial correlates of adults' eye-witness accuracy and suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 49-66.
22. Loftus, E. F. (1975). Leading question and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 560-572.
23. Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Wiley.
24. Loftus, E. F. (1981). Reconstructive memory processes in eyewitness testimony. In: B. D. Sales, ed. Perspective in Law and Psychology: The Trial Process, pp. 115-144. New York: Plenum Press.
25. Loftus, E. F. (1997). Creating false memories. Scientific American, 277, 70-75.
26. Loftus, E. F. & Zanni, G. (1975). Eyewitness testimony: The influence of wording a question. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 86-88.
27. Loftus, E. F., Greene, E. L. & Doyle, J. M. (1989). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. In: D. C. Raskin, ed. Psychological Methods in Criminal Investigation and Evidence, pp. 3-46. New York: Springer.
28. Mori, K. (2003). Surreptitiously projecting different movies to two subsets of viewers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 599-604.
29. Mori, K., Kanematsu, H., Mori, H., Yamaguchi, M., Shizuyama, M. & Fujisawa, T. (1999). Memory distortion in eyewitnesses who observed non-conforming events experimentally produced by polarizing filters. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Science and the 16th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society Joint Conference, pp. 219-222. Tokyo: Waseda.
30. Porter, S., Birt, A. R., Yuille, J. C. & Lehman, D. R. (2000). Negotiating false memories: Interviewer and rememberer characteristics relate to memory distortion. Psychological Science, 11, 507-510.
31. Ridgeway, C. L. & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191-216.
32. Schooler, J. W. & Loftus, E. F. (1986). Individual differences and experimentation: Complementary approaches to interrogative suggestibility. Social Behavior, 1, 105-112.
33. Stephenson, G. M., Kniveton, B. H. & Wagner, W. (1991). Social influences on remembering: Intellectual, interpersonal and intergroup components. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 463-475.
34. Takatori, K. (1980). The role of communication in the memory process - A comparative study of individual recall and cooperative recall. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 28, 29-34 (in Japanese).
35. Weldon, M. S., Blair, C. & Huebsch, P. D. (2000). Group remembering: Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1568-1577.
36. Wells, G. C. & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1985). Methodological notes on the accuracy confidence relationship in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 413-419.
37. Williams, J. E. & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring Sex Stereotypes: A Multinational Study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Wright, D. B., Self, G. & Justice, C. (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 189-202.
39. Yarmey, A. D. (1992). The effects of dyadic discussion on ear-witness recall. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13, 251-263.