A coordination model for improving software system attack-tolerance and survivability in open hostile environments

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing

Volumn 2006 II, Issue , 2006, Pages 394-402

  Kwiat, Kevin ^a   Ren, Shangping ^b  

^a AIR FORCE RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT PROPAGATION; IMPROVING SOFTWARE SYSTEM ATTACK TOLERANCE; OPEN HOSTILE ENVIRONMENTS; SURVIVABLE FEEDBACK LOOPS;

ABSTRACTING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONSTRAINT THEORY; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK;

FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845455094     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SUTC.2006.1636205     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. G. Agha. Actors: A model of concurrent computation in distributed systems. MIT Press, 1986.
2. F. Arbab. IWIM: A communication model for cooperative systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, pages 567-585, 1996.
3. M. Cremonini, A. Omicini, and F. Zambonelli. Coordination and access control in open distributed agent system: The tucson approach. In In a. Porto and G. C. Roman, editors, Coordination Languages and Models, volume 1906, pages 99-114. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, 2000.
4. A. Degani. Taming HAL: Designing Interfaces Beyond 2001. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
5. S. Frølund. Coordinating Distributed Objects: An Actor-Based Approach to Synchronization. MIT Press, 1996.
6. S. Frølund and G. Agha. Abstracting interactions based on message sets. In in Object-Based Models and Languages for Concurrent Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 924, pp 107-124, Springer Verlag, 1996.
7. D. Gelernter. Generative communication in linda. 7:80-112, 1985.
8. M.-W. Jang, A. Ahmed, and G. Agha. A flexible coordination framework for application-oriented matchmaking and brokering services. In Technical Report UIUCDCS-R-2004-2430, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2004.
9. A. D. Keromytis, J. Parekh, P. N. Gross, G. Kaiser, V. Misra, J. Nieh, D. Rubenstein, and S. Stolfo. A holistic approach to service survivability. In SSRS '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM workshop on Survivable and self-regenerative systems, pages 11-22, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
10. K. S. Killourhy, R. A. Maxion, and K. M. Tan. A defensecentric taxonomy based on attack manifestations. In International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks. IEEE, 2004.
11. K. Kwiat, K. Ravindran, and P. Hurley. Energy-efficient replica voting mechanisms for secure real-time embedded systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Taormina - Giardini Naxos, June 2005.
12. J.-C. Laprie. Dependability of software-based critical systems. In Dependable Network Computing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.
13. P. Lee and T. Anderson. Fault Tolerance: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition, Dependable Computing and Fault-Tolerant System, volume 3. Springer-Verlag, 1990.
14. J. McDermott, A. Kim, and J. Froscher. Merging paradigms of survivability and security: stochastic faults and designed faults. In NSPW '03: Proceedings of the 2003 workshop on New security paradigms, pages 19-25, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
15. A. Omicini and E. Denti. From tuple spaces to tuple centers. 41(3):277-294, 2001.
16. B. Randell. Facing up to faults. The Computer Jorunal, 43(2):95 - 106, 2000. Turing Memorial Lecture.
17. S. Ren, N. Chen, Y. Yu, P.-E. Poirot, L. Shen, and K. Marth. Actors, roles and coordinators a coordination model for open distributed embedded systems. In COORDINATION'06, 2006. Accepted.
18. R.J.Ellison, D. Fisher, R. Linger, H. Lipson, T.Longstaff, and N. Mead, "survivable network systems: An emerging discipline. Technical Report CMU/SEI-97-TR-013 and ESC-TR-97-013, Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute, Nov. 1997, Rev. May 1999.
19. B. Robinson. Data protection: Emerging threats spur technology updates and a new class of security devices. Federal Computer Week, 19(35), Oct. 2005.
20. C. M. U. Software Engineering Institute. Survivable network analysis. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/programs/nss/.
21. J. P. G. Sterbenz, R. Krishnan, R. R. Hain, A. W. Jackson, D. Levin, R. Ramanathan, and J. Zao. Survivable mobile wireless networks: issues, challenges, and research directions. In WISE '02: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Wireless security, pages 31-40, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.
22. C. A. Varela and G. Agha. A hierarchical model for coordination of concurrent activities. In International Conference on Coordination (COORDINATION '99), LNCS 1594, pp 166-, 1999.
23. A. Wood. Coordination with attributes. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages, 1999.
24. K.-P. Yee. User interaction design for secure systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Security, 2002.
25. R. Ziaei and G. Agha. SynchNet: a petri net based coordination language for distributed objects. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Generative programming and component engineering, pages 324-343, New York, NY, USA, 2003. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.