Sensitive dependence of the coefficient of variation of interspike intervals on the lower boundary of membrane potential for the leaky integrate-and-fire neuron model

BioSystems

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 49-57

  Inoue, Junko ^a   Doi, Shinji ^b  

^a KYOTO KOKA WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Coefficient of variation; Integrate and fire neuron model; Interspike interval; Leaky integrator; Reversal potential

Indexed keywords

MEMBRANE; NERVOUS SYSTEM;

ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MODEL; NERVE CELL STIMULATION; SPIKE WAVE; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

ACTION POTENTIALS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURONS;

EID: 33845454835     PISSN: 03032647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Badoual M., Rudolph M., Piwkowska Z., Destexhe A., and Bal T. High discharge variability in neurons driven by current noise. Neurocomputing 65 (2005) 493-498
2. Brunel N. Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8 (2000) 183-208
3. Bugmann G., Christodoulou C., and Taylor J.G. Role of temporal integration and fluctuation detection in the highly irregular firing of a leaky integrator neuron model with partial reset. Neural Comput. 9 (1997) 985-1000
4. Burkitt A.N. Balanced neurons: analysis of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with reversal potentials. Biol. Cybern. 85 (2001) 247-255
5. Christodoulou C., and Bugmann G. Near Poisson-type firing produced by concurrent excitation and inhibition. Biosystems 58 (2000) 41-48
6. Christodoulou C., and Bugmann G. Coefficient of variation versus mean interspike interval curves: what do they tell us about the brain?. Neurocomputing 38-40 (2001) 1141-1149
7. Feng J., and Brown D. Coefficient of variation of interspike intervals greater than 0.5. How and when?. Biol. Cybern. 80 (1999) 291-297
8. Feng J., and Brown D. Impact of correlated inputs on the output of the integrated-and-fire model. Neural Comput. 12 (2000) 671-692
9. Fourcaud-Trocme N., and Brunel N. Dynamics of the instantaneous firing rate in response to changes in input statistics. J. Comput. Neurosci. 18 (2005) 311-321
10. Giorno V., Lánský P., Nobile A.G., and Ricciardi L.M. Diffusion approximation and first-passage-time problem for a model neuron. III. A birth-and-death process approach. Biol. Cybern. 58 (1988) 387-404
11. Gutkin B.S., and Ermentrout G.B. Dynamics of membrane excitability determine interspike interval variability: a link between spike generation mechanisms and cortical spike train statistics. Neural Comput. 10 (1998) 1047-1065
12. Hanson F.B., and Tuckwell H.C. Diffusion approximation for neuronal activity including synaptic reversal potential. J. Theor. Biol. 2 (1983) 127-153
13. Inoue, J., Sato, S., Ricciardi, L.M., 1997. A note on the moments of the first-passage time of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with a reflecting boundary. Ricerche di Matematica, vol. XLVI, fasc. 1, pp. 87-99.
14. Inoue J. Quantitative comparison of various stochastic models of single neurons: simplicity and physiological plausibility. Proceedings of the 1999 International Symposium on Nonlinear Theory and its Applications (1999) 123-126
15. Koning P., Engel A.K., and Singer W. Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of the cortical neuron revisited. Trends Neurosci. 19 (1996) 130-137
16. Lánská V., Lánský P., and Smith C.E. Synaptic Transmission in a diffusion model for neural activity. J. Theor. Biol. 166 (1994) 393-406
17. Lánský P., and Lánská V. Diffusion Approximation of the neuronal model with synaptic reversal potentials. Biol. Cybern. 56 (1987) 19-26
18. Lánský P., Rodriguez R., and Sacerdote L. Mean instantaneous firing frequency is always higher than the firing rate. Neural Comput. 16 (2004) 477-489
19. Lánský P., Sacerdote L., and Tomassetti F. On the comparison of Feller and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models for neural activity. Biol. Cybern. 73 (1995) 457-465
20. Lindner B., Longtin A., and Bulsara A. Analysis Expressions for rate and CV of a type I neuron driven by white gaussian noise. Neural Comput. 15 (2003) 1761-1788
21. Meffin H., Burkitt A.N., and Grayden D.B. An analytical model for the 'large, fluctuating synaptic conductance state' typical of neocortical neurons in vivo. J. Comput. Neurosci. 16 (2004) 159-175
22. Ricciardi L.M., and Sacerdote L. The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process as a model for neuronal activity. I. Mean and variance of the firing time. Biol. Cybern. 35 (1979) 1-9
23. Ricciardi L.M., and Sato S. First-passage-time density and moments of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. J. Appl. Prob. 25 (1988) 43-57
24. Rudolph M., and Destexhe A. The discharge variability of neocortical neurons during high-conductance states. Neuroscience 119 (2003) 855-873
25. Sacerdote L., and Smith C.E. New parameter relationships determined via stochastic ordering for spike activity in a reversal potential neural model. Biosystems 58 (2000) 59-65
26. Sacerdote L., and Smith C.E. A qualitative comparison of some diffusion models for neural activity via stochastic ordering. Biol. Cybern. 83 (2000) 543-551
27. Sakai Y., Funahashi S., and Shinomoto S. Temporally correlated inputs to leaky integrate-and-fire models can reproduce spiking statistics of cortical neurons. Neural Networks 12 (1999) 1181-1190
28. Salinas E., and Sejnowski T.J. Impact of correlated synaptic input on output firing rate and variability in simple neuronal models. J. Neurosci. 20 (2000) 6193-6209
29. Shadlen M.N., and Newsome W.T. Noise, neural codes and cortical organization. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 4 (1994) 569-579
30. Shadlen M.N., and Newsome W.T. The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computations, and information coding. J. Neurosci. 18 (1998) 3870-3896
31. Shinomoto S., Sakai Y., and Funahashi S. The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process does not reproduce spiking statistics of neurons in prefrontal cortex. Neural Comput. 11 (1999) 935-951
32. Softky W.R., and Koch C. The highly irregular firing of cortical cells is inconsistent with temporal integration of random EPSPs. J. Neurosci. 13 (1993) 334-350
33. Stein R.B. A theoretical analysis of neuronal variability. Biophys. J. 5 (1965) 173-194
34. Steinmetz P.N., Manwani A., and Koch C. Variability and coding efficiency of noisy neural encoders. Biosystems 62 (2001) 87
35. Stevens C.F., and Zador A.M. Input synchrony and the irregular firing of cortical neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 1 (1998) 210-217
36. Svirskis G., and Rinzel J. Influence of temporal correlation of synaptic input on the rate and variability of firing in neurons. Biophys. J. 79 (2000) 629-637
37. Tiesinga P.H.E., Jose J.V., and Sejnowski T.J. Comparison of current-driven and conductance-driven neocortical model neurons with Hodgkin-Huxley voltage-gated channels. Phys. Rev. E 62 (2000) 8413-8419
38. Troyer T.W., and Miller K.D. Physiological gain leads to high ISI variability in a simple model of a cortical regular spiking cell. Neural Comput. 9 (1997) 971-983
39. Tuckwell H.C. Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology: Nonlinear and Stochastic Theories, vol. 2 (1988), Cambridge University Press
40. Tuckwell H.C. Spike trains in a stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley system. Biosystems 80 (2005) 25-36