Use of a Prototype Acute Stroke Registry to Improve Care. Profile of Receptive Stroke Programs

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 6 SUPPL. 2, 2006, Pages

  Stewart, Valerie T ^a  

^a EARLE A CHILES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; REGISTER; REVIEW; SELF REPORT; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT;

ACUTE DISEASE; BENCHMARKING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; OREGON; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; TIME FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845446720     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.014     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. American Heart Association. 2001 Heart and stroke statistical update (2001), American Heart Association, Dallas TX
2. American Heart Association. 2005 Heart and stroke statistical update (2005), American Heart Association, Dallas TX
3. Reeves M.J., Arora S., Broderick J.P., et al., Paul Coverdell Prototype Registries Writing Group. Acute stroke care in the U.S.: results from 4 pilot prototypes of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke 36 (2005) 1232-1240
4. Advisory Working Group on Stroke Center Identification Options of the American Stroke Association. Recommendations for improving the quality of care through stroke centers and systems: an examination of stroke center identification options: multidisciplinary consensus recommendations from the Advisory Working Group on stroke center identification options of the American Stroke Association. Stroke 33 1 (2002) e1-e7
5. Ginsburg L.S. Factors that influence line managers' perceptions of hospital performance data. Health Serv Res 38 (2003) 261-286
6. American Stroke Association-Program Capacity Assessment Criteria, Acute Stroke Treatment Program. Available at: www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/1083357931526ASTP_Overview.pdf
7. Alberts M.J., Hademenos G., Latchaw R.E., et al. Recommendations for the establishment of primary stroke centers. Brain Attack Coalition. JAMA 283 (2000) 3102-3109
8. House K, Stewart VT. A consensus method to identify quality measures for statewide stroke care, 6th Scientific Forum on quality of care and outcomes research. Cardiovasc Dis Stroke. Abstract #306.
9. Batalden P.B., Nelson E.C., Edwards W.H., Godfrey M.M., and Mohr J.J. Microsystems in healthcare: Part 9: Developing small clinical units to attain peak performance. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 29 (2003) 575-585
10. Keppel G., Saufley W.H., and Tokunaga H. Introduction to design and analysis: a student's handbook. 2nd ed. (1992), W.H. Freeman and Co, New York
11. LaBresh K.A., Schwamm L., Albright D., et al. Does Get With the Guidelines improve secondary prevention in patients hospitalized with ischemic stroke or TIA?. Stroke 36 (2005) 416-P84
12. Hess D.C., Wang S., Hamilton W., et al. REACH: Clinical feasibility of a rural telestroke network. Stroke 36 (2005) 2018
13. Berwick D.M. A primer on leading the improvement of systems. BMJ 312 (1996) 619-622