American College of Cardiology 2006 Principles to Guide Physician Pay-for-Performance Programs. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Work Group on Pay for Performance (A Joint Working Group of the ACC Quality Strategic Direction Committee and the ACC Advocacy Committee)

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2603-2609

  Brush Jr , John E ^a   Krumholz, Harlan M ^a   Wright, Janet S ^a   Brindis, Ralph G ^a   Cacchione, Joseph G ^a   Drozda Jr , Joseph P ^a   Fasules, James W ^a   Flood, Kathleen B ^a   Garson Jr , Arthur ^a   Masoudi, Frederick A ^a   McBride, Tilithia ^a   McKay, Charles R ^a   Messer, Joseph V ^a   Mirro, Michael J ^a   O'Toole, Michael F ^a   Peterson, Eric D ^a   Schaeffer, John W ^a   Valentine, C Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CARDIOLOGY; FEES, MEDICAL; HUMANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REIMBURSEMENT, INCENTIVE; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845441542     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.046     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. Committee on Quality of Health Care in America IOM. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
2. Borger C., Smith S., Truffer C., et al. Health spending projections through 2015: changes on the horizon. Health Aff (Millwood) 25 (2006) 61-73
3. Lucas F.L., DeLorenzo M.A., Siewers A.E., and Wennberg D.E. Temporal trends in the utilization of diagnostic testing and treatments for cardiovascular disease in the United States, 1993-2001. Circulation 113 (2006) 374-379
4. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2005 Update (2005), American Heart Association, Dallas, TX
5. Rosenthal M.B., Frank R.G., Li Z., and Epstein A.M. Early experience with pay-for-performance: from concept to practice. JAMA 294 (2005) 1788-1793
6. Epstein A.M., Lee T.H., and Hamel M.B. Paying physicians for high-quality care. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 406-410
7. Gosfield A.G. P4P: transitional at best. Manag Care 14 (2005) 64-66 69
8. Med-Vantage. Pay for Performance. 2006. Available at: http://www.medvantageinc.com/Content/solutions.p4p.php4. Accessed November 16, 2006.
9. The Leapfrog Group for Patient Safety. Incentives and Rewards Compendium. 2006. Available at: http://ir.leapfroggroup.org/compendium.
10. Dudley R.A. Pay-for-performance research: how to learn what clinicians and policy makers need to know. JAMA 294 (2005) 1821-1823
11. Kouides R.W., Bennett N.M., Lewis B., Cappuccio J.D., Barker W.H., and LaForce F.M. Performance-based physician reimbursement and influenza immunization rates in the elderly. The Primary-Care Physicians of Monroe County. Am J Prev Med 14 (1998) 89-95
12. Fairbrother G., Hanson K.L., Friedman S., and Butts G.C. The impact of physician bonuses, enhanced fees, and feedback on childhood immunization coverage rates. Am J Public Health 89 (1999) 171-175
13. Amundson G., Solberg L.I., Reed M., Martini E.M., and Carlson R. Paying for quality improvement: compliance with tobacco cessation guidelines. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 29 (2003) 59-65
14. Roski J., Jeddeloh R., An L., et al. The impact of financial incentives and a patient registry on preventive care quality: increasing provider adherence to evidence-based smoking cessation practice guidelines. Prev Med 36 (2003) 291-299
15. American Medical Association. Guidelines for Pay-for-Performance Programs (2005), American Medical Association, Chicago, IL
16. American College of Physicians. Linking Physician Payments to Quality of Care. Position Paper (2005), American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, PA
17. American Academy of Family Physicians. Shaping the future of pay for performance programs. Ann Fam Med 3 (2005) 562-564
18. Bufalino V., Peterson E.D., Burke G.L., et al. Payment for quality: guiding principles and recommendations: principles and recommendations from the American Heart Association's Reimbursement, Coverage, and Access Policy Development Workgroup. Circulation 113 (2006) 1151-1154
19. Gibbons R.J., Smith S., and Antman E. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: Part I: where do they come from?. Circulation 107 (2003) 2979-2986
20. Gibbons R.J., Smith Jr. S.C., and Antman E. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: part II: evolutionary changes in a continuous quality improvement project. Circulation 107 (2003) 3101-3107
21. Spertus J.A., Eagle K.A., Krumholz H.M., Mitchell K.R., and Normand S.L. American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol 45 (2005) 1147-1156
22. Patel M.R., Spertus J.A., Brindis R.G., et al. ACCF proposed method for evaluating the appropriateness of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 1606-1613
23. Brindis R.G., Douglas P.S., Hendel R.C., et al. ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology endorsed by the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 1587-1605
24. Radford M.J., Arnold J.M., Bennett S.J., et al. ACC/AHA key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with chronic heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Heart Failure Clinical Data Standards): developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation 112 (2005) 1888-1916
25. Cannon C.P., Battler A., Brindis R.G., et al. American College of Cardiology key data elements and definitions for measuring the clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Acute Coronary Syndromes Writing Committee). J Am Coll Cardiol 38 (2001) 2114-2130
26. Brindis R.G., Fitzgerald S., Anderson H.V., Shaw R.E., Weintraub W.S., and Williams J.F. The American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR): building a national clinical data repository. J Am Coll Cardiol 37 (2001) 2240-2245
27. Eagle K.A., Gallogly M., Mehta R.H., et al. Taking the national guideline for care of acute myocardial infarction to the bedside: developing the Guideline Applied in Practice (GAP) initiative in Southeast Michigan. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 28 (2002) 5-19
28. Mehta R.H., Montoye C.K., Gallogly M., et al. Improving quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: the Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) initiative. JAMA 287 (2002) 1269-1276
29. Montoye C.K., and Eagle K.A. An organizational framework for the AMI ACC-GAP Project. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 1-29
30. Eagle K.A., Montoye C.K., Riba A.L., et al. Guideline-based standardized care is associated with substantially lower mortality in Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) projects in Michigan. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 1242-1248
31. Douglas P.S., Eckel R.H., Gray D.T., Loeb J.M., and Straube B.M. Coming together to achieve quality cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006) 266-267
32. Krumholz H.M., Brindis R.G., Brush J.E., et al. Standards for statistical models used for public reporting of health outcomes: an American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Writing Group: cosponsored by the Council on Epidemiology and Prevention and the Stroke Council. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation 113 (2006) 456-462