Abundance and movement of understory birds in a Maulino forest fragmented by pine plantations

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 15, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 3937-3947

  Vergara, Pablo M ^a,b   Simonetti, Javier A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Maulino forest; Pinus radiata; Tapaculos; Understory birds

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BIRD; CONIFEROUS TREE; FOREST DYNAMICS; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT QUALITY; HABITAT TYPE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MOVEMENT; NATIVE SPECIES; PLANTATION; UNDERSTORY; VULNERABILITY;

CHILE; SOUTH AMERICA;

AVES; EUGRALLA PARADOXA; PINUS RADIATA; PTEROPTOCHOS CASTANEUS; RHINOCRYPTIDAE; SCYTALOPUS MAGELLANICUS;

EID: 33845429708     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: 15729710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-005-2355-2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Acosta-Jamett G. and Simonetti J.A. 2004. Habitat use by Oncifelis guiga and Pseudalopex culpaeus in a fragmented forest landscape in central Chile. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 1135-1151.
2. Bare B.B. and Hann B.W. 1981. Application of ridge regression in forestry. For. Sci. 27: 339-348.
3. Estades C. and Escobar M.A. 2005. In: Smith-Ramírez C. Armesto J.J. and Valdovinos C. (eds), Historia, biodiversidad y ecología de los bosques costeros de Chile. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, pp. 600-616.
4. Falls J.B. 1981. Mapping territories with playback: an accurate census method for songbirds. Stud. Avian Biol. 6: 86-91.
5. Grez A.A. 2005. In: Smith-Ramírez C. Armesto J.J. and Valdovinos C. (eds), Historia, biodiversidad y ecología de los bosques costeros de Chile. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, pp. 565-572.
6. Grez A.A. Moreno P. and Elgueta M. 2003. Coleópteros (Insecta: Coleoptera) epígeos asociados al bosque Maulino y plantaciones de pino aledañas. Rev. Chil. Entomol. 29: 9-18.
7. Higgins F.K. Oldemeyer J.L., Jenkins K.J. Clambey G.K. and Harlow R.F. 1996. In: Bookhout T.A. (eds), Research and Management Techniques for Wildlife and Habitats, 5th ed. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, pp. 567-588.
8. Hosmer D.W. and Lemeshow S. 1998. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
9. Johnson A.W. 1967. The birds of Chile and adjacent regions of Argentina, Bolivia and Peru. Platt Establecimientos Gráficos, Buenos Aires.
10. Krabbe N.K. and Schulenberg T.S. 2003. In: del Hoyo J.Krabbe N.K. and Schulenberg T.S. (eds), Handbook of the Bords of the World. Lynx Ediciones and BirdLife International, Barcelona, pp. 748-787.
11. Lara A.Echeverría C. and Reyes R. 2002. In: Gligo N. (eds) Estado del medio ambiente en Chile 2002. LOM Ediciones, Santiago, pp. 133-160.
12. Lindenmayer D.B. and Lacy R.C. 1995. Metapopulation viability of arboreal marsupials in fragmented old-growth forests: comparison among species. Ecol. Appl. 5: 183-199.
13. Lindenmayer D.B. and Hobbs R.J. 2004. Fauna conservation in Australian plantation forests - a review. Biol. Conserv. 119: 151-168.
14. López G. and Moro M.J. 1997. Birds of Aleppo pine plantations in south-east Spain in relation to vegetation composition and structure. J. Appl. Ecol. 34: 1257-1272.
15. Reid S. Díaz I.A. Armesto J.J. and Willson M.F. 2004. Importance of native bamboo for understory birds in Chilean temperate forests. Auk 121: 515-525.
16. San Martín J. and Donoso C. 1995. In: Armesto J.J. Villagrán C. and Arroyo M.K. (eds), Ecología de los bosques nativos de Chile. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, pp. 153-168.
17. Sekercioglu C.H. Ehrlich P.R. Daily G.C.Aygen D.Goehring D. and Sandi R. 2002. Disappearance of insectivorous birds from tropical forest fragments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99: 263-267.
18. Sieving K.E., Willson M.F. and de Santo T.L. 1996. Habitat barriers to movement of understory birds in fragmented south-temperate rainforest. Auk 113: 944-949.
19. Sieving K.E., Willson M.F. and de Santo T.L. 2000. Defining corridor functions for endemic birds in fragmented south-temperate rainforest. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1120-1132.
20. Simonetti J.A., Grez A.A. and Bustamante R.O. 2002. El valor de la matriz en la conservación ambiental. Ambiente y Desarrollo 18: 116-118.
21. St.Clair C.C., Belisle M., Desrochers A. and Hannon S. 1998. Winter responses of forest birds to habitat corridors and gaps. Conserv. Ecol. 2: 13 (http://www.consecol.org/vol2/iss2/art13).
22. Stouffer P C. and Bierregaard R.O. 1995. Use of Amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. Ecology 76: 2429-2445.
23. Vergara P.M. and Simonetti J.A. 2003. Forest fragmentation and rhinocriptid nest predation in central Chile. Acta Oecol. 24: 285-288.
24. Vergara P.M. and Simonetti J.A. 2004a. Avian responses to fragmentation of the Maulino in central Chile. Oryx 38: 383-388.
25. Vergara P.M. and Simonetti J.A. 2004b. Does nest-site cover reduce nest predation for rhinocryptids? J. Field Ornithol. 75: 188-191.
26. Wiens J.A. 1990. Habitat fragmentation and wildlife populations: the importance of autoecology, time and landscape structure. Transactions 19th International Union of Game Biologists Congress, Trondheim 1989, pp. 381-391.
27. Willson M.F. 2004. Loss of habitat connectivity hinders pair formation and juvenile dispersal of Chucao tapaculos in Chilean rainforest. Condor 106: 166-171.
28. Willson M.F., de Santo T.L., Sabag C. and Armesto J.J. 1994. Avian communities of fragmented south-temperate rainforests in Chile. Conserv. Biol. 8: 508-520.