How to distinguish good and bad arguments: Dialogico-rhetorical normativity

Argumentation

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 179-196

  Slob, Wouter H ^a  

^a NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Commensurability; Dialectic; Idiosyncrasy; Normativity; Rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845426820     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1015589400146     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Aristotle: 1965, De Sophisticis Elenchis, trans. E. S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, London/Cambridge, Mass.
2. Aristotle: 1989, Topica, trans. E. S. Forster, Loeb Classical Library, London/Cambridge, Mass.
3. Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue; A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
4. Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst: 1987, 'Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective', Argumentation 1, 283-301.
5. Eemeren, Frans H. van and Rob Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies; a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
6. Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst and Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.): 1996, Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory; A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah.
7. Freeman, James B.: 1991, Dialectics and the Macro structure of Arguments; a Theory of Arguments Structure, Foris, Berlin.
8. Govier, Trudy: 1987, Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation, Foris, Dordrecht.
9. Groarke, Leo: 1995, 'What Pragma-dialectics Can Learn from Deductivism, and What Deductivism Can Learn from Pragma-dialectics', in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard (eds.), Analysis and Evaluation. Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, vol. I, 138-145.
10. Haack, Susan: 1978, Philosophy of Logics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Hamblin, C. L.: 1970, Fallacies, Methuen, London.
12. Hintikka, Jaako: 1987, 'The Fallacy of Fallacies', Argumentation 1, 211-238.
13. Johnson, R. H. and J. A. Blair: 1983, Logical Self-defense, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto etc.
14. Johnson, Ralph H.: 1995, 'Informal Logic and Pragma-dialectics: Some Differences', in Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, J. Anthony Blair and Charles A. Willard, Perspectives and Approaches. Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation, Vol. II, 237-245.
15. Perelman, Ch. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric; A Treatise on Argumentation, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame/London.
16. Ray, John: 1978, 'Perelman's Universal Audience', The Quarterly Journal of Speech 64, 361-375.
17. Rescher, Nicholas, 1988, Rationality; A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature and the Rationale of Reason, Clarendon, Oxford.
18. Rescher, N.: 1993, Pluralism; against the demand for Consensus, Clarendon, Oxford.
19. Schrag, Calvin O.: 1992, The Resources of Rationality; a Response to the Postmodern Challenge, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
20. Walton, Douglas N.: 1989, Informal Logic. A Handbook for Critical Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Walton, Douglas: 1996, Argument Structure; A Pragmatic Theory, University of Toronto Press, Toronto/London.
22. Walton, Douglas N. and Erik C. W. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue; Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning, SUNY, Albany.