Reducing substance use improves adolescents' school attendance

Addiction

Volumn 101, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1741-1751

  Engberg, John ^a   Morral, Andrew R ^a  

^a RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent alcohol and drug use; School performance; Substance abuse; Substance abuse treatment

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS; CENTRAL STIMULANT AGENT; PSYCHEDELIC AGENT; SEDATIVE AGENT;

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL ABUSE; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION RESEARCH; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STUDENT ATTITUDE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE;

ABSENTEEISM; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ADULT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SCHOOLS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33845422061     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: 13600443     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01544.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Burgess S. M., Propper C. Early health-related behaviours and their impact on later life chances: evidence from the US. Health Econ 1998; 7: 381-99.
2. Bryant R. R., Samaranayake V. A., Wilhite A. The influence of current and past alcohol use on earnings: three approaches to estimation. J Appl Behav Sci 1993; 29: 9-31.
3. Cook P. J., Moore M. J. Drinking and schooling. J Health Econ 1993; 12: 411-29.
4. Friedman A. S., Bransfield S., Kreisher C. Early teenage substance use as a predictor of educational-vocational failure. Am J Addict 1994; 3: 325-36.
5. Grunbaum J. A., Kann L., Kinchen S. A., Williams B., Ross J. G., Lowry R. et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 2001. Surveillance summaries. MMWR 2002; 51: 1-21.
6. Huizinga D., Loeber R., Thornberry T. P. Longitudinal study of delinquency, drug use, sexual activity, and pregnancy among children and youth in three cities. Public Health Rep 1993; 108: 90-6.
7. Mensch B., Kandel D. B. Drug use as a risk factor for premarital teen pregnancy and abortion in a national sample of young white women. Demography 1992; 29: 409-29.
8. Komro K. A., Williams C. L., Forster J. L., Perry C. L., Farbakhsh K., Stigler M. H. The relationship between adolescent alcohol use and delinquent and violent behaviors. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse 1999; 9: 13-28.
9. Pepler D. J., Craig W. M., Connolly J., Henderson K. Bullying, sexual harassment, dating violence, and substance use among adolescents. In: Wekerle C., Wall A. M., editors. The violence and addiction equation: theoretical and clinical issues in substance abuse and relationship violence. New York: Brunner-Routledge; 2002, p. 153-68.
10. Newcomb M. D. Identifying high-risk youth: prevalence and patterns of adolescent drug abuse. In: Rahdert E., Czechowics D., editors. Adolescent drug abuse: clinical assessment and therapeutic interventions. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1995, p. 7-38.
11. Newcomb M. D., Bentler P. M. The impact of late adolescent substance use on young adult health status and utilization of health services: a structural-equation model over four years. Soc Sci Med 1987; 24: 71-82.
12. Yamada T., Kendix M., Yamada T. The impact of alcohol consumption and marijuana use on high school graduation. Health Econ 1996; 5: 77-92.
13. Levy F., Murname R. US earnings levels and earnings inequality: a review of recent trends and proposed explanations. J Econ Lit 1992; 30: 1332-81.
14. Bachman J. G., Johnston L. D., O'Malley P. M. Explaining recent increases in students' marijuana use: impacts of perceived risks and disapproval, 1976 and 1996. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 887-92.
15. Marston A. R., Jacobs D. F., Singer R. D., Widaman K. F., Little T. D. Adolescents who apparently are invulnerable to drug, alcohol and nicotine use. Adolescence 1988; 23: 593-8.
16. Mensch B. S., Kandel D. B. Dropping out of high school and drug involvement. Sociol Educ 1988; 61: 95-113.
17. Ellickson P. L., Bui K., Bell R. M., McGuigan K. A. Does early drug use increase the risk of dropping out of high school? J Drug Issues 1998; 28: 357-80.
18. Dozier A. L., Barnes M. J. Ethnicity, drug user status and academic performance. Adolescence 1997; 32: 825-37.
19. Yamaguchi K., Kandel D. B. Patterns of drug use from adolescence to young adulthood. III. Predictors of progression. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 673-81.
20. Lynskey M. T., Coffey C., Degenhardt L., Carlin J. B., Patton G. A longitudinal study of the effects of adolescent cannabis use on high school completion. Addiction 2003; 98: 685-92.
21. McCluskey C. P., Krohn M. D., Lizotte A. J., Rodriguez M. L. Early substance use and school achievement: an examination of Latino, White, and African American youth. J Drug Issues 2002; 32: 921-44.
22. Brook J. S., Balka E. B., Whiteman M. The risks for late adolescence of early adolescent marijuana use. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 1549-54.
23. Brown S. A., Mott M. A., Myers M. G. Adolescent alcohol expectancies in relation to personal and parental drinking. J Abnorm Psychol 1990; 96: 117-21.
24. Brown S. A., D'Amico E. J., McCarthy D. M., Tapert S. F. Four-year outcomes from adolescent alcohol and drug treatment. J Stud Alcohol 2001; 62: 381-8.
25. Azrin N. H., Donohue B., Besalel V. A., Kogan E. S., Acierno R. Youth drug abuse treatment: a controlled outcome study. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse 1994; 3: 1-16.
26. Bryant A. L., Schulenberg J. E., O'Malley P. M., Bachman J. G., Johnston L. D. How academic achievement, attitudes, and behaviors relate to the course of substance use during adolescence: a 6-year, multiwave national longitudinal study. J Res Adolesc 2003; 13: 361-97.
27. Jessor R., Jessor S. L. Problem behavior and psychosocial development: a longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
28. Willoughby T., Chalmers H., Busseri M. A. Where is the syndrome? Examining co-occurrence among multiple problem behaviors in adolescence. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72: 1022-37.
29. Gottfredson M. R., Hirschi T. A general theory of crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press; 1990.
30. Moffitt T. E. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 1993; 4: 674-701.
31. Pratt T. C., Cullen F. T. Empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: a meta-analysis. Criminology 2000; 38: 931-64.
32. Dennis M. L., Titus J. C., Diamond G., Donaldson J., Godley S. H., Tims F. M. et al. The cannabis youth treatment (CYT) experiment: rationale, study design and analysis plans. Addiction 2002; 97: 16-34.
33. Dennis M. L., Dawud-Noursi S., Muck R. D., McDermeit M. The need for developing and evaluating adolescent treatment models. In: Stevens S. J., Morral A. R., editors. Adolescent substance abuse treatment in the United States: exemplary models from a national evaluation study. New York: The Haworth Press; 2003, p. 3-34.
34. Stevens S. J., Morral A. R., editors. Adolescent substance abuse treatment in the United States: exemplary models from a national evaluation study. New York: The Haworth Press; 2003.
35. Dennis M. L. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) manual: administration, scoring and interpretation. Bloomington, IL: Lighthouse Publications; 1999.
36. Dennis M. L., Babor T. F., Diamond G., Donaldson J., Godley S. H., Tims F. M. et al. The cannabis youth treatment (CYT) experiment: preliminary findings. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2000.
37. Dennis M. L., Scott C. K., Godley M. D., Funk R. Comparisons of adolescents and adults by ASAM profile using GAIN data from the drug outcome monitoring study (DOMS): preliminary data tables. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 1999. Available at: http://chestnut.org/LI/Posters/index.html (accessed 2 June 2006).
38. Butler J. S., Moffitt R. A computationally efficient quadrature procedure for the one factor multinomial probit model. Econometrica 1982; 50: 761-4.
39. Conway M. R. A random effects model for binary data. Biometrics 1990; 46: 317-28.
40. Chamberlain G. Analysis of covariance with qualitative data. Rev Econ Stud 1980; 47: 225-38.
41. Hausman J. A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 1978; 46: 1251-71.
42. Brook J. S., Richter L., Whiteman M., Cohen P. Consequences of adolescent marijuana use: incompatibility with the assumption of adult roles. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr 1999; 125: 193-207.
43. Gfroerer J. C., Epstein J. F. Marijuana initiates and their impact on future drug abuse treatment need. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 54: 229-37.
44. The DASIS Report. Characteristics of primary alcohol admissions by age of first use of alcohol: 2002. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies (14 April 2005), DHHS (cited 28 April 2005). Available at: http://www.drugabusestatistics.samhsa.gov/2k5/ alcAgeTX/alcAgeTX.htm (accessed 2 June 2006).
45. Fergusson D. M., Lynskey M. T., Horwood L. J. The short-term consequences of early onset cannabis use. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1996 August; 4: 499-512.
46. Jainchill N. Therapeutic communities for adolescents: the same and not the same. In: De Leon G., editor. Community as method: therapeutic communities for special populations and special settings. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1997, p. 161-78.
47. Shane P., Cherry L., Gerstel T. Thunder road adolescent substance abuse treatment program. In: Stevens S. J., Morral A. R., editors. Adolescent substance abuse treatment in the United States: exemplary models from a national evaluation study. New York: The Haworth Press; 2003, p. 257-84.
48. Morral A. R., Jaycox L. H., Smith W., Becker K., Ebener P. An evaluation of substance abuse treatment services for juvenile probationers at Phoenix Academy of Los Angeles. In: Stevens S. J., Morral A. R., editors. Adolescent substance abuse treatment in the United States: exemplary models from a national evaluation study. New York: The Haworth Press; 2003, p. 213-34.
49. Kaestner R. Illicit drug use and labor market outcomes: a review of economic theory and its empirical implications. J Drug Issues 1998; 28: 663-80.