The influence of the T stage on the risk of metastasis of penis cancer: T1 vs. T2;Der einfluss des T-stadiums auf das metastasierungsrisiko des peniskarzinoms: T1 vs. T2

Urologe - Ausgabe A

Volumn 45, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 1424-1430

  Naumann, C M ^a   Van Der Horst, C ^a   Volkmer, B ^b   Kurtz, F ^b   Martinez Portillo F J ^a   Seif, C ^a   Hautmann, S ^b   Braun, P M ^a   Hautmann, R ^a   Junemann K P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Lymph node metastasis; Lymphadenectomy; Penile carcinoma; Prognosis; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INGUINAL LYMPH NODE; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PENIS CARCINOMA; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CELL TRANSFORMATION, NEOPLASTIC; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPH NODES; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PENILE NEOPLASMS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE BIOPSY;

EID: 33845417139     PISSN: 03402592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-006-1160-1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bouchot O, Rigaud J, Maillet F et al. (2004) Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 45: 761-766
2. Coblentz TR, Theodorescu D (2002) Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 168(4): 1386-1389
3. Colberg JW, Andriole GL, Catalona WJ (1997) Long term follow-up of men undergoing modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis. Br J Urol 79(1): 54-57
4. Culkin JC, Beer TM (2003) Advanced penile carcinoma. J Urol170: 359-365
5. D'Ancona CLA, De Lucena RG, De Oliveira Querne FA et al. (2004) Long-term followup of penile carcinoma treated with penectomy and bilateral modified inguinal lymphadenectomy. J Urol 172(2): 498-501
6. Emerson RE, Ulbright TM, Eble JN et al. (2001) Predicting cancer progression in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of depth of invasion and vascular invasion. Mod Pathol 14(10): 963-968
7. Ficarra V, Zattoni F, Cunico SC et al. (2005) Penile Cancer Project. Lymphatic and vascular embolizations are independent predictive variables of inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: Gruppo Uro-Oncologico del Nord Est (Northeast Uro-Oncological Group) Penile Cancer data base data. Cancer 103(12): 2507-2516
8. Hall MC, Sanders JS, Vuitch F et al. (1998) Deoxyribonucleic acid flow cytometry and traditional pathologic variables in invasive penile carcinoma: assessment of prognostic significance. J Urol 52(1): 111-116
9. Horenblas S (2001) Lymphadenektomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. Part 2: The role and technique of lymph node dissection. BJU Intern 88: 473-483
10. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP et al. (2005) Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 173: 816-819
11. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Meinhardt W et al. (2005) Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: Evaluation of 10 years experience. Eur Urol 47: 601-606
12. Lopes A, Bezerra ALR, Pinto CA et al. (2002) p53 as a new prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis in penile carcinoma: a analysis of 82 patients treated with amputation and bilateral lymphadenectomy. J Urol 168: 81-86
13. Lynch DF Jr, Pettaway CA (2002) Tumors of the penis. In: Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughan E, Wein A, editors. Campbell's urology, 8th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2945-2982
14. McDougal WS (1995) Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 154(4): 1364-1366
15. Müller-Mattheis V, Hautzel H, Fürst G, Ackermann R (2005) Ist die Positronenemissionstomographie (PET) mit 18F-FDG bei der Diagnostik von Lymphknotenmetastasen des Peniskarzinom von Bedeutung? Urologe 44(Suppl 1): 97-98
16. Naumann CM, Filippow N, Seif C et al. (2005) Penile Carcinoma (pT1G2): Surveillance or inguinal lymph node dissection? Onkologie 28: 135-138
17. Nelson BA, Cookson MS, Smith JA et al. (2004) Complications of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: A contemporary series. J Urol 172: 494-497
18. Ornellas AA, Seixas AL, Marota A et al. (1994) Surgical treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: retrospective analysis of 350 cases. J Urol 151(5): 1244-1249
19. Ravi R (1993) Correlation between the extent of nodal involvement and survival following groin dissection for carcinoma of the penis. Br J Urol 72(5 Pt 2): 817-819
20. Sanchez-Ortiz RF, Curtis A, Pettaway CA (2004) The role of lymphadenectomy in penile cancer. Urol Oncol 22(3): 236-244
21. Scher B, Seitz M, Reiser M et al. (2005) 18F-FDG PET/CT for Staging of Penile Cancer. J Nucl Med 46(9): 1460-1465
22. Slaton JW, Morgenstern N, Levy DA et al. (2001) Tumor stage, vascular invasion and percentage of poorly differentiated cancer: independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cancer. J Urol 165(4): 1138-1142
23. Sobin LH, Wittekind C (2002) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors, 6th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York (http://www.wiley.com/go/tnm)
24. Solsona E, Algaba F, Horenblas S et al. (2004) Guidelines on penile cancer. European Association of Urology. (http://www.uroweb.org/files/uploaded_ files/guidelines/22891_Penile_Cancer.pdf. Update March 2004)
25. Solsona E, Iborra I, Rubio J et al. (2001) Prospective validation of the association of local tumor stage and grade as predictive factor for occult lymph node micrometastasis in patients with penile carcinoma and clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes. J Urol 165(5): 1506-1509
26. Tabatabaei S, Harisinghani M, McDougal WS (2005) Regional lymph node staging using lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxtran-10 in patients with penile cancer. J Urol 174: 923-927
27. Theodorescu D, Russo P, Zhang ZF et al. (1996) Outcomes of initial surveillance of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the penis and negative nodes. J Urol 155(5): 1626-1631
28. Villavicencio H, Rubio-Briones J, Regalado R et al. (1997) Grade, local stage and growth pattern as prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis. Europ Urol 32(4): 442-447