3D frequency-domain finite-difference modeling of acoustic wave propagation using a massively parallel direct solver: A feasibility study

SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 2265-2269

  Operto, S ^a   Virieux, J ^a   Amestoy, P ^b   Giraud, L ^b   L'Excellent, J Y ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

^b IRIT   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845416278     PISSN: 10523812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2369987     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Amestoy, P. R., A. Guermouche, J. Y. L'Excellent, and S. Pralet, 2006, Hybrid scheduling for the parallel solution of linear systems: Parallel Computing, 32, 136-156. 9ev ZZZZZZ 0167-8191 Parallel Comput.
2. Aminzadeh, F., N. Burehard, L. Nicoletis, F. Rocca, and K. Wyatt, 1995, SEG/EAEG 3-D modeling project: Third report: The Leading Edge, 14, 125-128. lee LEEDFF 1070-485X The Leading Edge
3. Hustedt, B., S. Operto, and J. Virieux, 2004, A direct-iterative solver for seismic wave propagation modelling: A space and wavelet approach: Geophysical Journal International, 155, 953-980. gji GJINEA 0956-540X Geophys. J. Int.
4. Jo, C.-H., C. Shin, and J. H. Suh,. 1996, An optimal 9-point, finitedifference, frequencyspace, 2-d scalar wave extrapolator: Geophysics, 61, 529-537. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 Geophysics
5. Karypis, G., and V. Kumar, 1998, METIS - a software package for partitioning unstructured graphs, partitioning meshes and computing fill-reducing orderings of sparse matrices - version 4.0: University of Minnesota.
6. Liu, J. W. H., 1992, The multifrontal method for sparse matrix solution: theory and practice: SIAM review, 34, 82-109. sir SIREAD 0036-1445 SIAM Rev.
7. MUMPS-team, 2006, MUMPS - MUltifrontal Massively Parallel Solver users' guide - version 4.6.1: ENSEEIHT-ENS Lyon, http://www.enseeiht.fr/apo/ MUMPS/ or http://graal.ens-lyon.fr/MUMPS.
8. Operto, S., J. Virieux, and J. X. Dessa, 2006, Frequency-domain fullwaveform inversion of OBS wide-angle seismic data: Presented at the 68th Annual Conference and Exhibition, EAGE.
9. Pratt, R. G., C. Shin, and G. J. Hicks, 1998, Gauss-newton and full newton methods in frequency-space seismic waveform inversion: Geophysical Journal International, 133, 341-362. gji GJINEA 0956-540X Geophys. J. Int.
10. Ravaut, C., S. Operto, L. Improta, J. Virieux, A. Herrero, and P. Dell'Aversana, 2004, Multiscale imaging of complex structures from multifold wide-aperture seismic data by frequency-domain full-waveform tomography: Application to a thrust belt: Geophysical Journal International, 159, 1032-1056. gji GJINEA 0956-540X Geophys. J. Int.
11. Saenger, E. H., N. Gold, and A. Shapiro, 2000, Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid: Wave Motion, 31, 77-92. wvm WAMOD9 0165-2125 Wave Motion
12. Stekl, I., and C. Pain, 2002, 3D frequency domain visco-acoustic modeling using rotated finite difference operators: 64th Annual Conference and Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, C-27.
13. Virieux, J., 1984, SH wave propagation in heterogeneous media, velocity-stress finite difference method: Geophysics, 49, 1259-1266. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 Geophysics