Towards the seislet transform

SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 2847-2851

  Fomel, Sergey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845395739     PISSN: 10523812     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1190/1.2370116     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Candés, E. J., and L. Demanet, 2004, The curvelet representation of wave propagators is optimally sparse: Technical report, California Institute of Technology.
2. Claerbout, J. F., 1992, Earth soundings analysis: Processing versus inversion: Blackwell Scientific Publications, Inc.
3. Claerbout, J. F, 2006, Basic earth imaging: Stanford Exploration Project, http://sepwww.stanford.edu/sep/prof/.
4. Cohen, A., I. Daubechies, and J. Feauvea, 1992, Bi-orthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets: Commumicatios of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 45, 485-560.
5. Dessing, F. J., 1997, A wavelet transform approach to seismic processing: Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology.
6. Do, M. N., and M. Vetterli, 2005, The contourlet transform: An efficient directional multiresolution image representation: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 14, 2091-2106. iei IIPRE4 1057-7149 IEEE Trans. Image Process.
7. Donoho, D. L., 1995, De-noising by soft-thresholding: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 41, 613-627. iet IETTAW 0018-9448 IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory
8. Douma, H., and M. V. de Hoop, 2005, On common-offset prestack time migration with curvelets: 75th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2009-2012.
9. Fomel, S., 2002, Applications of plane-wave destruction filters: Geophysics, 67, 1946-1960. gpy GPYSA7 0016-8033 Geophysics
10. Foster, D. J., C. C. Mosher, and S. Hassanzadeh, 1994, Wavelet transform methods for geophysical applications: 64th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 1465-1468.
11. Herrmann, F., 2003, Optimal seismic imaging with curvelets: 73rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 997-1000.
12. Mallat, S., 1999, A wavelet tour of signal processing: Academic Press.
13. Morlet, J., 1981, Sampling theory and wave propagation: 51st Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts.
14. Pennec, E. L., and S. Mallat, 2005, Sparse geometrical image representation with bandelets: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 14, 423-438. iei IIPRE4 1057-7149 IEEE Trans. Image Process.
15. Starck, J. L., E. J. Candés, and D. L. Donoho, 2000, The curvelet transform for image denoising: IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 11, 670-684. iei IIPRE4 1057-7149 IEEE Trans. Image Process.
16. Sweldens, W., 1995, The lifting scheme: A new philosophy in biorthogonal wavelet constructions: Wavelet Applications in Signal and Image Processing III, 68-79, Proc. SPIE 2569.
17. Sweldens, W., and P. Schröder, 1996, Building your own wavelets at home, Wavelets: Computer Graphics, 15-87.
18. Velisavljevic, V., 2005, Directionlets: Anisotropic multi-directional representation with separable filtering: Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.
19. Wapenaar, K., R. Ghose, G. Toxopeus, and J. Fokkema, 2005, The wavelet transform as a tool for geophysical data integration: Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 12, 5-23.
20. Welland, G., ed. 2003, Beyond wavelets: Academic Press.