Participatory design in health sciences: Using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 122-130

  Clemensen, Jane ^a   Larsen, Simon B ^a   Kyng, Morten ^a   Kirkevold, Marit ^a,b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Action based research; Computer technology; Diabetes related foot ulcers; Participatory design

Indexed keywords

ACTION RESEARCH; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; DIABETIC FOOT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; INTERVENTION STUDY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TELETHERAPY; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DIABETIC FOOT; HUMANS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 33845394309     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732306293664     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Attesjö,A., Hedström, S. Å., & Solberg, C. O. (1996). Diabetesfoten. Stockholm, Sweden: Pharmacia & Upjohn, Sverige AB.
2. Bardram, J. E., & Larsen, S. B. (2004, April). Hoppers Home and Hoppers Hospital: Usability laboratories for home care. In Proceedings ofthe CHI2004 workshop on HCI and homecare: Connecting families and clinicians. Retrieved April 26, 2006, from http://www.scr.siemens.com/ CHI2004_Workshop/papers.html
3. Bødker, S., Grønbæk, K., & Kyng, M. (1993). Cooperative design: Techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. In D. Schuler & A. Mamioka (Eds.), Participatory design (pp. 157-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Cave, A. J., & Ramsden, V. R. (2002). Hypothesis: The research page-Participatory action research. Canadian Family Physician, 48, 1671-1672.
5. Clemensen, J., Larsen, S. B., & Bardram, J. E. (2004). Developing pervasive e-health for moving experts from hospital to home. IADIS International Journal on WWW/Internet, 2, 57-68.
6. Clemensen, J., Larsen, S., & Ejskjær, N. (2005). Telemedical treatment at home of diabetic foot ulcers. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 11(S2), 14-16.
7. Ehn, P., & Kyng, M. (1987). Collective resource approach to systems design. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, & M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge (pp. 17-57). Aldershot, UK: Avebury, Gower.
8. Emery, F. (1978). The emergence of a new paradigm of work. Canberra: Centre for Continuing Education, Australian National University.
9. Garshnek, V., & Burkle, F. M. (1998). Telecommunications and informatics contributions to the future of public health: A forecast. In Pacific Medical Technology Symposium. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/ proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/pacmedtek/1998/8667/00/ 8667toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/PACMED.1998.769984
10. Gottrup, F., & Olsen, L. (1997). Sår-Baggrund, Diagnose og Behandling [Wounds: Background, diagnosis, and treatment]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard.
11. Greenbaum, J. (1993). A design of one's own: Towards participatory design in the United States. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices (pp. 27-37). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Grønbæk, K., Kyng, M., & Mogensen, P. (1997). Toward a cooperative experimental system development approach. In L. Mathiassen & M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and design in context (pp. 201-238). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Hagey, R. S. (1997). The use and abuse of participatory action research. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 18, 1-4.
15. Holter, I., & Schwartz-Barcott, D. (1993). Action research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 298-304.
16. Jacques, E. (1952). The changing culture of a factory. New York: Dryden.
17. Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. R. (1987). Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. London: Institute for Social Inventions.
18. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1982). The action research planner (2nd ed.). Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
19. Kyng, M. (1998). Users and computers: A contextual approach to design of computer artefacts. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 10, 7-44.
20. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34-46.
21. Lindsey, E., Sheilds, L., & Stajduhar, K. (1999). Creating effective nursing partnerships: Relating community development to participatory action research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(5), 1238-1245.
22. Mogensen, P. H. (1994). Challenging practice: An approach to cooperativeanalysis. Doctoral dissertation DAIMI PB-465, Aarhus University, Institute for Computer Science.
23. Mumford, E. (1987). Sociotechnical systems design: Evolving theory and practice. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn, & M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and democracy: A Scandinavian challenge (pp. 59 - 76). Aldershot, UK: Avebury, Gower.
24. O'Brien, R. (2001). Um exame da abordagem metodológica da pesquisa açāo [An overview of the methodological approach of action research]. In R. Richardson (Ed.), Teoria e práticada pesquisa açāo [Theory and practice of action research]. Joāo Pessoa, Brazil: Universidade Federal da Paraíba. English version retrieved December 13, 2005, from http://www.web.ca/~robrien/papers/arfinal.html
25. Winter, R., & Munn-Giddings, C. (2001). A handbook for action research in health and social care. London: Routledge.
26. World Health Organization Europe & International Diabetes Federation Europe. (1990). Diabetes care and research in Europe: The St. Vincent declaration. Diabetic Medicine, 7, 360.