Ranking ontologies with AKTiveRank

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4273 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 1-15

  Alani, Harith ^a   Brewster, Christopher ^b   Shadbolt, Nigel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; DATA STRUCTURES; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; LIBRARIES; SEARCH ENGINES;

KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURES; ONTOLOGY LIBRARIES; ONTOLOGY SEARCH; STRUCTURAL METRICS;

ONLINE SEARCHING;

EID: 33845393576     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11926078_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. H. Alani. Ontology construction from online ontologies. In Proc. 15th International World Wide Web Conference, Edinburgh, 2006.
2. H. Alani and C. Brewster. Ontology ranking based on the analysis of concept sructures. In 3rd Int. Conf. Knowledge Capture (K-Cap), pages 51-58, Banff, Canada, 2005.
3. C. Brewster, H. Alani, S. Dasmahapatra, and Y. Wilks. Data driven ontology evaluation. In Int. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal, 2004.
4. P. R. Cohen and R. Kjeldsen. Information retrieval by constrained spreading activation in semantic networks. Information Processing & Management, 23(4):255-268, 1987.
5. L. Ding, T. Finin, A. Joshi, R. Pan, R. S. Cost, Y. Peng, P. Reddivari, V. C. Doshi, and J. Sachs. Swoogle: A semantic web search and metadata engine. In Proc. 13th ACM Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, Nov. 2004.
6. L. Ding, R. Pan, T. Finin, A. Joshi, Y. Peng, and P. Kolari. Finding and ranking knowledge on the semantic web. In Proc. 4th Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC), pages 156-170, Galway, Ireland, 2005.
7. L. Freeman. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40:35-41, 1977.
8. A. Gangemi, C. Catenacci, M. Ciaramita, and J. Lehmann. A theoretical framework for ontology evaluation and validation. In Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP) - 2nd Italian Semantic Web Workshop, Trento, Italy, 2005.
9. A. Gomez-Perez. Some ideas and examples to evaluate ontologies. In 11th Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Applications. IEEE Computer Society, 1995.
10. N. Guarino and C. Welty. Evaluating ontological decisions with ontoclean. Communications of the ACM, 45(2):61-65, 2002.
11. M. Jones and H. Alani. Content-based ontology ranking. In Proceedings of the 9th Int. Protege Conf., Stanford, CA, 2006.
12. A. Kalyanpur, B. Parsia, E. Sirin, B. Cuenca-Grau, and J. Hendler. Swoop: A 'web' ontology editing browser. Journal of Web Semantics, 4(2), 2005.
13. A. Lozano-Tello and A. Gomez-Perez. Ontometric: A method to choose the appropriate ontology. Journal of Database Management, 15(2), 2005.
14. A. Maedche and S. Staab. Measuring similarity between ontologies. In Proc. European Conf. on Knowledge Acquisition and Management (EKAW), pages 251-263, Madrid, 2002.
15. N. F. Noy, M. Sintek, S. Decker, M. Crubezy, R. W. Fergerson, and M. A. Musen. Creating semantic web contents with protege-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems, pages 60-71, 2001.
16. C. Patel, K. Supekar, Y. Lee, and E. Park. Ontokhoj: A semantic web portal for ontology searching, ranking, and classification. In Proc. 5th ACM Int. Workshop on Web Information and Data Management, pages 58-61, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2003.
17. R. Rada, H. Mili, E. Bicknell, and M. Blettner. Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. on Systems Management and Cybernetics, 19(1):17-30, 1989.
18. P. Resnik. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 11:95-130, 1999.
19. E. Rosch. Principles of Categorization, in E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd editors. Cognition and Categorization, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1978.
20. G. Spanoudakis and P. Constantopoulos. Similarity for analogical software reuse: A computational model. In Proc. 11th European Conf. on AI, ECAI'94, pages 18-22, 1994.
21. K. Supekar. A peer-review approach for ontology evaluation. In 8th Int. Protege Conf., pages 77-79, Madrid, Spain, July 2005.
22. A.Tversky. Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84(4), 1977.
23. P. C. Weinstein and W. P. Birmingham. Comparing concepts in differentiated ontologies. In Proc. 12th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (KAW 99), Banff, Alberta, Canada, 1999.