On the choice of farm management practices after the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in 2003

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 332-340

  Schmid, Erwin ^a   Sinabell, Franz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH WIFO   (Austria)

Author keywords

Agri environmental measures; Agricultural sector model; Austria; Common Agricultural Policy; Farm management practices

Indexed keywords

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURE; AGRICULTURAL SECTOR MODELS; ANIMAL HEALTH; AUSTRIA; COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES; FARM MANAGEMENT; FARM MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; FOOD-SAFETY; MANAGEMENT PRACTISES;

FARMS;

NITROGEN;

AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL PRACTICE; AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION; COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; POLICY REFORM;

AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL WORKER; ANIMAL HEALTH; ANIMAL WELFARE; ARTICLE; AUSTRIA; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUROPEAN UNION; FOOD SAFETY; INCOME; MODEL; POLICY;

AUSTRIA; CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33845392542     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baldock, D., Dwyer, J., Sumpsi Vinas, J.M., 2002. Environmental Integration and the CAP. A Report to the European Commission, DG Agriculture, Institute for European Environmental Policy. Available at: 〈http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/envir/report/ieep_en.pdf〉
2. BMLFUW (Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft), 2002. Standarddeckungsbeiträge und Daten für die Betriebsberatung 2002/03. Selbstverlag, Wien.
3. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2002. Decision No 1600/2002 EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 July 2002 lying down the Sixth Community Environmental Action Programme. official Journal of the European Communities, L 242/1.
4. CEC (Commission of the European Communities), 2003. EU Rural Development Monitoring Data-Synthesis Report for 2001, SEC(2003) 1482. Brussels.
5. Dantzig G.B., and Wolfe P. The decomposition algorithm for linear programs. Econometrica 29 (1961) 767-778
6. Doyle, Ch., 1999. Overall summary of the workshop discussion and recommandations. In: OECD (Ed.), Environmental Indicators for Agriculture: Vol. 2, Issues and Design. The York Workshop, OECD, Paris, pp. 49-64.
7. FAPRI-Ireland-Partnership, 2003. The Luxembourg CAP Reform Agreement: Analysis of the Impact on EU and Irish Agriculture. Teagasc Rural Economy Research Centre, October 14th 2003, Dublin.
8. Fischler, F., 2003. Speech delivered at the CAP Reform Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels. Press Release Rapid DN: SPEECH/03/356, Date: 09/07/2003.
9. Freyer B., Eder M., Schneeberger W., Darnhofer I., Kirner L., Lindenthal T., and Zollitsch W. Der biologische Landbau in Österreich-Entwicklungen und Perspektiven. Agrarwirtschaft 50 7 (2001) 400-409
10. Greek Presidency, 2003. Presidency Compromise in Agreement with the Commission 〈http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/03/st10/st10961en03.pdf〉.
11. Greimel M., Handler F., Stadler M., and Blumauer E. Methode zur Ermittlung des einzelbetrieblichen und gesamtösterreichischen Arbeitszeitbedarfes in der Landwirtschaft. Die Bodenkultur 54 2 (2003) 143-152
12. Howitt R.E. Positive mathematical programming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77 (1995) 329-342
13. Jordan C., Mihalyfalvy E., Garrett M.K., and Smith R.V. Modelling of nitrate leaching on a regional scale using a GIS. Journal of Environmental Management 42 (1994) 279-298
14. Lee D.J., and Howitt R.E. Modelling regional agricultural production and salinity control alternatives for water quality policy analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78 (1996) 41-53
15. LEI, IAP and IAM, 2003. Development of models and tools for assessing the environmental impact of agricultural policies. Final Report (ENV.B.2/ETU/2000/073), The Hague, 27. April 2003.
16. McCarl B.A. Cropping activities in agricultural sector models: a methodological proposal. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64 (1982) 768-772
17. Moxey A.P., White B., Sanderson R.A., and Rushton S.P. An approach to linking an ecological vegetation model to an agricultural economic model. Journal of Agricultural Economics 46 3 (1995) 381-397
18. OECD. Environmental Indicators for Agriculture-vol. 3, Methods and Results (2001), OECD, Paris
19. OECD. Agricultural Outlook 2003-2008 (2003), OECD, Paris
20. OECD. Analysis of the 2003 CAP reform (2004), OECD, Paris
21. Önal H., and McCarl B.A. Aggregation of heterogeneous firms in mathematical programming models. European Journal of Agricultural Economics 16 4 (1989) 499-513
22. Önal H., and McCarl B.A. Exact aggregation in mathematical programming sector models. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39 (1991) 319-334
23. Önal H., Algozin K.A., Isik M., and Hornbaker R.H. Economically efficient watershed management with environmental impact and income distribution goals. Journal of Environmental Management 53 (1998) 241-253
24. Paris, Q., Arfini, F., 1995. A Positive Mathematical Programming Model for the Analysis of Regional Agricultural Policies. Proceedings of the 40th Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists, Ancona.
25. Parris, K., 2001. Measuring the Environmental Impacts of the Common Agricultural Policy: Challenges, Recent Trends and Outlook, and Future Directions. Paper presented to the European Institute of Public Administration Seminar: "The Common Agriculture Policy and the Environmental Challenge-New Tasks for the Public Administrations?", Maastricht, The Netherlands, 14-15 May 2001. Available at: http://www.eipa.nl/Publications/Summaries/01/31401/5_Parris.pdf
26. Röhm O., and Dabbert S. Integrating agri-environmental programs into regional production models: an extension of positive mathematical programming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 (2003) 254-265
27. Salhofer K., and Streicher G. Self-selection as a problem in evaluating agri-environmental programs. In: Ortner K.M. (Ed). Assessing Rural Development Policies of the CAP (2005), Vauk Verlag, Kiel 203-214
28. Schmid, E., 2001. Efficient Policy Design to Control Effluents from Agriculture. Dissertation, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences Vienna.
29. Schmid, E., Sinabell, F., 2005. Using the Positive Mathematical Programming Method to Calibrate Linear Programming Models. Discussion paper dp-10-2005. Institute for Sustainable Economic Development, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna.
30. Sinabell F., and Schmid E. Entkopplung der Direktzahlungen. Konsequenzen für Österreichs Landwirtschaft (2003), WIFO-Forschungsendbericht, Wien
31. Wier M.J., Andersen M., Jensen J.D., and Jensen Th.C. The EU's Agenda 2000 reform for the agricultural sector: environmental and economic effects in Denmark. Ecological Economics 41 2 (2002) 345-359
32. Yiridoe E.K., and Weersink A. Marginal abatement costs of reducing groundwater-n pollution with intensive and extensive farm management choices. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review October (1998) 169-185
33. Zalidis G.C., Tsiafouli M.A., Takavakoglou V., Bilas G., and Misopolinos N. Selecting agri-environmental indicators to facilitate monitoring and assessment of EU agri-environmental measures effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Management 70 (2004) 309-314