SASMINT system for database interoperability in collaborative networks

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4275 LNCS - I, Issue , 2006, Pages 91-108

  Unal, Ozgul ^a   Afsarmanesh, Hamideh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTEROPERABILITY; PATTERN MATCHING;

COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS; HETEROGENEOUS DATABASES; QUERY PROCESSING; SEMI-AUTOMATIC SCHEMA GENERATION;

DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33845388143     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11914853_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Camarinha-Matos, L.M., H. Afsarmanesh, and M. Ollus. ECOLEAD: A Holistic Approach to Creation and Management of Dynamic Virtual Organizations. In Proc. of PRO-VE'05, p. 3-16, 2005.
2. Afsarmanesh, H. and L.M. Camarinha-Matos. A Framework for Management of Virtual Organizations Breeding Environments. In Proc. of PRO-VE'05, p. 35-48, 2005.
3. Sheth, A. and J. Larson, Federated Database Systems for Managing Distributed, Heterogeneous, and Autonomous Databases. ACM Computing Surveys, 22(3): p. 183-236, 1990.
4. Tuijnman, F. and H. Afsarmanesh, Management of Shared Data in Federated Cooperative PEER Environment. International Journal of Intelligent & Cooperative Information Systems, 2(4): p. 451-473, 1993.
5. Unal, O. and H. Afsarmanesh. Interoperability in Collaborative Network of Biodiversity Organizations. In Proc. of PRO-VE'06, Accepted for Publication, 2006.
6. Hammer, J. and D. McLeod, An Approach to Resolving Semantic Heterogeneity in a Federation of Autonomous, Heterogeneous Database Systems. International Journal of Intelligent & Cooperative Information Systems, World Scientific, 2(1): p. 51-83, 1993.
7. Bergamaschi, S., et al. A Semantic Approach to Information Integration: the MOMIS project. In Proc. of Sesto Convegno della Associazione Italiana per l'Intelligenza Artificiale, AI*IA98, 1998.
8. Bayardo, R.J., et al. InfoSleuth: Agent-Based Semantic Integration of Information in Open and Dynamic Environments. In Proc. of ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, 1997.
9. Arens, Y., C.A. Knoblock, and W.-M. Shen, Query Reformulation for Dynamic Information Integration. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems: p. 99-130, 1996.
10. Mena, E., et al., OBSERVER: An Approach for Query Processing in Global Information Systems based on Interoperation across Pre-existing Ontologies. Distributed and Parallel Databases Journal, 8(2): p. 223-271, 2000.
11. Madhavan, J., P.A. Bernstein, and E. Rahm. Generic Schema Matching with Cupid. In Proc. of VLDB, p. 49-58, 2001.
12. Do, H.H. and E. Rahm. COMA - A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches. In Proc. of VLDB, p. 610-621, 2002.
13. Melnik, S., H. Garcia-Molina, and E. Rahm. Similarity Flooding: A Versatile Graph Matching Algorithm and its Application to Schema Matching. In Proc. of ICDE, 2002.
14. Mitra, P., G. Wiederhold, and S. Decker. A scalable framework for the interoperation of information sources. In Proc. of. International Semantic Web Working Symposium, 2001.
15. Doan, A., et al. Learning to Map between Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In Proc. of World-Wide Web Conf. (WWW-2002), 2002.
16. Miller, R.J., L.M. Haas, and M.A. Hernandez. Schema Mapping as Query Discovery. In Proc. of VLDB, p. 77-88, 2000.
17. Embley, D.W., L. Xu, and Y. Ding, Automatic direct and indirect schema mapping: Experiences and lessons learned. ACM SIGMOD Record, 33(4): p. 14-19, December 2004.
18. Bernstein, P.A., et al., Industrial-Strength Schema Matching. ACM SIGMOD Record, 33(4): p. 38-43, December 2004.
19. Rahm, E., H.-H. Do, and S. Maßmann, Matching Large XML Schemas. ACM SIGMOD Record, 33(4): p. 26-31, December 2004.
20. Levenshtein, V.I., Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Cybernetics and Control Theory, 10(8): p. 707-710, 1966.
21. Monge, A.E. and C. Elkan. The Field Matching Problem: Algorithms and Applications. In Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 267-270. 1996.
22. Jaro, M.A., Probabilistic linkage of large public health. Statistics in Medicine: p. 14:491-498, 1995.
23. Salton, G. and C.S. Yang, On the specification of term values in automatic indexing. Journal of Documentation, (29): p. 351-372, 1973.
24. Jaccard, P., The distribution of flora in the alpine zone. The New Phytologist, 11(2): p. 37-50, 1912.
25. Cleverdon, C.W. and E.M. Keen, Factors determining the performance of indexing systems, volume 2: test results, Aslib Cranfield Research Project. Cranfield Institute of Technology, 1966.
26. Rijsbergen, CJ.v., Information Retrieval: Butterworths, London, 1979.
27. Wu, Z. and M. Palmer. Verb Semantics and Lexical Selection. In 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 1994.
28. Fellbaum, C., An Electronic Lexical Database.: Cambridge: MIT press, 1998.
29. Lesk, M. Automatic Sense Disambiguation Using Machine Readable Dictionaries: How to Tell a Pine Code from an Ice Cream Cone. In Proc. of 5th International Conference on Systems Documentation, 24-26. 1986.
30. Blondel, V., et al., A Measure of Similarity between Graph Vertices: Applications to Synonym Extraction and Web Searching. Journal of SIAM Review, 46(4): p. 647-666, 2004.
31. Afsarmanesh, H., et al., The PEER Information Management Language User Manual. Technical Report CS-94-14, Department of Computer Systems, University of Amsterdam, 1994.