Commentary on puts' (2006) review of the case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution [1]

Archives of Sexual Behavior

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 633-636

  Wallen, Kim ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CLITORIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LETTER; MASTURBATION; ORAL SEXUAL CONTACT; ORGASM; PENIS; SEXUAL INTERCOURSE;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COITUS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIBIDO; ORGASM; SEXUAL PARTNERS;

EID: 33845387490     PISSN: 00040002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-006-9100-0     Document Type: Letter

References (8)

1. Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Animal Behaviour, 46, 887-909.
2. Barash, D. (2005). Let a thousand orgasms bloom! [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Evolutionary Psychology, 3, 347-354.
3. Fox, C. A., Wolff, H. S., & Baker, J. A. (1970). Measurement of intra-vaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by radio-telemetry. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 22, 243-251.
4. Judson, O. (2005). Anticlimax [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Nature, 436, 916-917.
5. Levin, R. J. (2002). The physiology of sexual arousal in the human female: A recreational and procreational synthesis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 405-411.
6. Lloyd, E. A. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Puts, D. A. (2006). [Review of the book The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution]. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 103-108.
8. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.