Comparison between microvascular integrity indexes assessed by pressure/Doppler wire and %FDG uptake in AMI following primary PCI

Korean Circulation Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 701-709

  Yoon, Myeong Ho ^a   Tahk, Seung Jea ^a   Choi, So Yeon ^a   Choi, Byoung Joo ^a   Joe, Dai Yeol ^a   Koh, Bo Ram ^a   Lim, Hong Seok ^a   Woo, Soung Iil ^a   Whang, Jung Won ^a   Choi, Jung Hyun ^a   Zheng, Zhen Guo ^a   Kang, Soo Jin ^a   Hwang, Gyo Seung ^a   Shin, Joon Han ^a  

^a Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Microvasculation; Myocardial infarction; Positron emission tomography; Viability

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18;

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; ADULT; AGED; AORTA PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY PRESSURE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MICROVASCULARIZATION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 33845365812     PISSN: 17385520     EISSN: 17385555     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2006.36.10.701     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Swinburn JM, Senior R. Myocardial viability assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts reduced mortality early after acute myocardial infarction: determining the risk of events after myocardial infarction (DREAM) study. Heart 2006;92:44-8.
2. Ito H, Iwakura K. Assessing the relation between coronary reflow and myocardial reflow. Am J Cardiol 1998;81:8G-12G.
3. Teiger E, Garot J, Aptecar E, et al. Coronary blood flow reserve and wall motion recovery in patients undergoing angioplasty after myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1999;20:285-92.
4. Lepper W, Hoffmann R, Kamp O, et al. Assessment of myocardial reperfusion by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography and coronary flow reserve after primary transluminal coronary angiography in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;101:2368-74.
5. Iliceto S, Galiuto L, Marchese A, Colonna P, Oliva S, Rizzon P. Functional role of microvascular integrity in patients with infarct-related artery patency after acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1997;18:618-24.
6. Mazur W, Bitar JN, Lechin M, et al. Coronary flow reserve may predict myocardial recovery after myocardial infarction in patients with TIMI grade 3 flow. Am Heart J 1998;136:335-44.
7. Ahn JC, Lim DS, Hwang GS, et al. Relation between coronary flow reserve and myocardial perfusion state and changes of coronary flow reserve in acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J 1999;29:1289-96.
8. Yoon MH, Tank SJ, Choi SY, et al. Coronary flow reserve as a predictor of long-term clinical outcome after acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J 2002;32:756-65.
9. Yoon MH, Tank SJ, Choi SY, et al. Microvascular integrity and ventricular function according to early ST-segment resolution in acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J 2003;33:183-95.
10. Choi SY, Tahk SJ, Yoon MH, et al. Comparison of TIMI myocardial perfusion grade with coronary flow reserve for prediction of recovery of LV function and LV remodeling in acute myocardial infarction. Korean Circ J 2004;34:247-57.
11. Kawamoto T, Yoshida K, Akasaka T, et al. Can coronary flow velocity pattern after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (correlation of angiography) predict recovery of regional leftventricular function in patients with acute myocardial infarction? Circulation 1999;100:339-45.
12. Akasaka T, Yoshida K, Kawamoto T, et al. Relation of phasic coronary flow velocity characteristics with TIM1 perfusion grade and myocardial recovery after primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and rescue stenting. Circulation 2000;101:2361-7.
13. Yamamuro A, Akasaka T, Tamita K, et al. Coronary flow velocity patterns immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention as a predictor of complications and in-hospital survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;106:3051-6.
14. Yamamoto K, Ito H, Iwakura K, et al. Pressure-derived collateral flow index as a parameter of microvascular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:1383-9.
15. Shimada K, Saknoue Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Assessment of myocardial viability using coronary zero flow pressure after successful angioplasty in patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction. Heart 2003;89:71-6.
16. Balachandran KP, Berry C, Norrie J, et al. Relation between coronary pressure derived collateral flow, myocardial perfusion grade, and outcome in left ventricular function after rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 2004;90:1450-4.
17. Lee CW, Park SW, Park SJ, et al. Pressure-derived fractional collateral blood flow: a primary determinant of left ventricular recovery after reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cariol 2000;35:949-55.
18. Sezer M, Nisanci Y, Umman B, Yilmaz E, Erzengin F, Ozsaruhan O. Relationship between collateral blood flow and microvascular perfusion after reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Jpn Heart J 2003;44:855-63.
19. di Carli MF, Maddashi J, Rokhsar S, et al. Long-term survival of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: implications for the role of myocardial viability assessment in management decisions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:997-1004.
20. Tamaki N, Kawamoto M, Takabashi N, et al. Prognostic value of an increase in fluorine-18 deoxyglucose uptake in patients with myocardial infarction: comparison stress thallium imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1621-7.
21. Bonow RO, Dilsizian V, Cuocolo A, Bacharach SL. Identification of viable myocardium in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: comparison of thallium scintigraphy with reinjection and PET imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose. Circulation 1991;83:26-37.
22. Gerwitz C, Fischman AJ, Abraham S, Gilson M, Strauss HW, Alpert NM. Positron emission tomographic measurements of absolute regional myocardial blood flow permits identification of nonviable myocardium in patients with chronic myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:851-9.
23. Eitzman D, Al-Aouar Z, Kanter HL, et al. Clinical outcome of patients with advanced coronary artery disease after viability studies with positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:559-65.
24. Slart RH, Bax JJ, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Prediction of functional recovery after revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction by gated FDG-PET. J Nucl Cardiol 2006;13:210-9.
25. Hori M, Inoue M, Kitakaze M, et al. Role of adenosine in hyperemic response of coronary blood flow in microembolization. Am J Physiol 1986;250:H509-18.
26. Uren NG, Crake T, Lefloy DC, de Silva R, Davies GJ, Maseri A. Delayed recovery of coronary resistive vessel function after coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:612-21.
27. Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation 2003;107:3129-32.
28. Ng MK, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2006;113:2054-61.
29. Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, et al. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesion. Circulation 2001;103:184-7.
30. de Bruyne B, Meier B, Finci L, Urban P, Rutishauser W. Potential protective effect of high coronary wedge pressure on left ventricular function after coronary occlusion. Circulation 1988;78:566-72.