An Investigation into the Relationship Between Teacher Motivation and Pupil Motivation

Educational Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 45-57

  Atkinson, E Stephanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845364160     PISSN: 01443410     EISSN: 14695820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014434100110371     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ANNING, A., JENKINS, E., and WHITELAW, S., 1996. “ Bodies of knowledge and design-based activities ”. In IDATER96, Edited by: SMITH, J.S., 5–10. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
2. ATKINSON, E.S., 1993. “ Identification of some causes of demotivation amongst pupils in Year 10 and 11 studying technology with special reference to design and technology ”. In IDATER93, Edited by: SMITH, J.S., 17–25. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
3. ATKINSON, E.S., 1994. “ Key factors which affect pupils performance in technology project work ”. In IDATER94, Edited by: SMITH, J.S., 30–37. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
4. ATKINSON, E.S., 1995. “ Approaches to designing at Key Stage 4 ”. In 2nd National Conference on Product Design Education, Edited by: EVATT, M., and JONES, A., 249–258. Coventry: School of Engineering, Coventry University.
5. ATKINSON, E.S., 1997. Identification of some causes of demotivation amongst Key Stage 4 pupils studying design and technology, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Newcastle University. Ph.D. thesis
6. ATKINSON, J.W., and FEATHER, N.T., 1966. A Theory of Achievement Motivation, New York: Wiley.
7. ATMAN, K.S., 1993. “ Curriculum implications of goal accomplishment style for design technologyeducation ”. In IDATER 92: keynote lectures, Edited by: SMITH, J. S., 1–10. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
8. BANDURA, M., and DWECK, C.S., 1985. The relationship of conceptions of intelligence and achievement goals to achievement-related cognition, affect and behaviour, in: C.S. DWECK & E.L. LEGGETT, 1988 A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95: 256–273.
9. BARLEX, D., 1994. “ Modelling in science and design and technology ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: BANKS, F., 74–81. London and New York: Routledge.
10. BIGGS, J.B., and MOORE, P.J., 1993. The Process of Learning, 3rd edn, Australia: Prentice Hall.
11. CHIDGEY, J., 1994. “ A critique of the design process ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: BANKS, F., 89–93. London: Routledge.
12. DAVIES, T., 1996. “ ª Whatº and ª Whereº is design creativity: a cognitive model for emergence of creative design ”. In IDATER96, Edited by: SMITH, J. S., 22–27. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough.
13. DENTON, H.G., 1992. “ The design and make task (DMT): some re¯ ections on designing in schools ”. In IDATER 93, Edited by: SMITH, J.S., 70–73. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
14. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE AND WELSH OFFICE. 1989. Design and Technology for Ages 5 to 16: Proposals, London: HMSO.
15. DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION AND THE WELSH OFFICE. 1992. Technology for Ages 5 to 16 (1992), London: HMSO.
16. DWECK, C.S., and LEGGETT, E.L., 1988. A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95: 256–273.
17. ELLIOT, E.S., and DWECK, C.S., 1988. Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54: 5–12.
18. ENTWISTLE, N.J., and RAMSDEN, P., 1983. Understanding Student Learning, Kent: Croom Helm.
19. FISHER, R., 1990. Teaching Children to Think, Oxford: Blackwell.
20. HOPPER, M., and DOWNIE, M., 1998. “ Developing design and technology capability-- rhetoric or reality? ”. In IDATER 98, Edited by: SMITH, J. S., and NORMAN, E.W.L., 54–59. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
21. HENNESSEY, S., and MCCORMICK, R., 1994. “ The general problem-solving process in technology education: myth or reality? ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: BANKS, F., 94–108. London: Routledge.
22. HENNESSEY, S., MCCORMICK, R., and MURPHY, P., 1993. The myth of general problem-solving capability, design and technology as an example. The Curriculum Journal,: 74–89.
23. GARNER, S.W., 1989. “ Drawing and designing exploration and manipulation through two-dimensional modelling ”. In DATER 89, Edited by: SMITH, J.S., 43–50. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
24. GARNER, S.W., 1994. “ The importance of graphic modelling ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: BANKS, F., 68–73. London: Routledge.
25. JONES, P.S., 1997. “ Cultural constructs of technology: a different paradigm for technology literacy ”. In IDATER 97, Edited by: SMITH, J.S., 53–60. Loughborough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
26. KIMBELL, R.A., 1982. Design Education-- foundation years, London: Routledge, Keegan Paul.
27. KIMBELL, R., STABLES, K., WHEELER, T., WOSNIAK, A., and KELLY, V., 1991. The assessment of performance in design and Technology-- The Final report of the APU Design and Technology Project 1985-91, London: School Examinations & Assessment Council/Evaluation & Monitoring Unit.
28. KIMBELL, R.A., 1994. Tasks in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1: 1–15.
29. LAYTON, D., 1991. Aspects of National Curriculum Design and Technology, York: National Curriculum Council.
30. LAWSON, B., 1990. How Designers Think: the design process de-mystified, 2nd Edn, London: Butterworth Architecture.
31. LICHT, B.G., and DWECK, C.S., 1983. “ Sex differences in academic orientation: consequences for academic choices and attainments ”. In Sex Differentiation and Schooling, Edited by: MARLAND, M., 72–97. London: Heinemann.
32. LIKERT, R., 1932. A techniques for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140: 256
33. MCALPINE, D., Creativity: thinking processes and teaching implications. Paper presented at 4thAnnual National Association for Curriculum Enrichment & Extension (NACE) Conference. Northampton. Nene College.
34. MORRIS, T., and THOMAS, P., 1995. “ Approaches to applied sport psychology ”. In Sport Psychology: theory, applications & issues, Edited by: MORRIS, T., and SUMMERS, J., 215–252. Chichester: Wiley.
35. NATIONAL CURRICULUM COUNCIL. 1993. Report on National Curriculum Council Consulation, York: NCC.
36. OFSTED. 1995. Design and Technology-- a review of inspection findings 1993/4, London: HMSO.
37. OSCHE, R., 1990. Before the Gates of Excellence: the determinants of creative genius, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. RIDING, R.J., and CHEEMA, I., 1991. Cognitive styles: an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11: 193–215.
39. RIGGS, A., 1994. “ Gender and technology education ”. In Teaching Technology, Edited by: BANKS, F., 217–226. London and New York: Routledge.
40. SAXTON, J., and MILLER, S., 1996. Design and designing: what's in a word?. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 1: 110–116.
41. SCHOOLS COUNCIL. 1975. Education through Design and Craft, London: Edward Arnold.
42. SELIGMAN, M.E., 1975. Helplessness, San Francisco: Freeman.
43. SHIELD, G., 1995. “ The process approach: a dilemma to be faced in the successful implementation of technology in the National Curriculum ”. In IDATER 95, Edited by: SMITH, J.S., 187–194. Loughbor-ough: Design and Technology, Loughborough University.
44. SYLVA, K., 1992. “ The impact of pre-school education on later educational motivations and attributions ”. In New concepts, new solutions, proceedings of the 1992 DECP Annual Course, Educational and Child Psychology Edited by: GRAY, P., Vol. 9, 9–16.
45. WEINER, B., 1992. Human Motivation, Metaphors, Theories, and Research, London: Sage.