Thesaurus-based approach for building domain ontology with a case study of military aircraft prototype ontology construction

Journal of Southeast University (English Edition)

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 353-356

  Zhen, Zhen ^a   Tang, Aimin ^b   Shen, Junyi ^a   Lu, Shengjun ^b  

^a XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b China Defense Science and Technology Information Center   (China)

Author keywords

Construction; Domain ontology; Methodology; Semantic relationship; Thesaurus

Indexed keywords

INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; MILITARY AIRCRAFT; SEMANTICS; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING; TERMINOLOGY; VOCABULARY CONTROL;

APPROXIMATE RELATIONSHIPS; CAUSE EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS; DEFENSE SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY THESAURUS; DOMAIN ONTOLOGY; ENTITY LOCATION RELATIONSHIPS; EQUIVALENT RELATIONSHIPS; GENERIC ABSTRACT RELATIONSHIPS; METHODOLOGY; PART WHOLE RELATIONSHIPS; PROTOTYPE ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC RELATIONSHIP; UNIVERSAL RELATIONSHIP GENRE;

THESAURI;

EID: 33845359671     PISSN: 10037985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Corcho O, Fernández-López M, Gómez-Pérez A. Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: where is their meeting point[J]. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 2003, 46(1): 41-64.
2. Fernández-López M, Gómez-Pérez A, Pazos-Sierra A, et al. Building a chemical ontology using METHONTOLOGY and the ontology design environment[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 1999, 14(1): 37-46.
3. Uschold M, King M. Towards a methodology for building ontologies[EB/OL]. (1995-07-31)[2006-05-07]. http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/project/ftp/documents/1995/95.
4. Uschold M. Building ontologies: towards a unified methodology[EB/OL]. (1996-09-01)[2006-05-07]. http://www.aiai.ed.ac.uk/project/pub/documents/1996/96-es96.
5. Uschold M, Gruninger M, Ontologies: principles methods and applications[J]. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 1996, 11(2): 93-155.
6. Royce W W. Managing the development of large software systems: concepts and techniques[A]. In: Proc of the 9th international conference on Software Engineering[C]. Los Alamitos: IEEE computer Society Press, 1987. 328-338.
7. Soergel D, Lauser B, Liang A, et al. Reengineering thesauri for new applications: the AGROVOC example[EB/OL]. (2004-03-17)[2006-05-07]. http://jodi.tamu.edu/Articles/ v04/i04/Soergel/.
8. Lauser B, Wildemann T, Poulos A, et al. A comprehensive framework for building multilingual domain ontologies: creating a prototype biosecurity ontology[A]. In: Proc of International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata for e-Communities[C]. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2002. 113-123.
9. Li Jing, Qian Ping. Differences and relationships between thesaurus and ontology[J]. Journal of Library Science in China, 2004, 30(1): 36-39. (in Chinese)
10. ISO TC46/SC9. ISO 2788-1986 guideline for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri[S]. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 1986.
11. Aitchison J, Clarke S D. The thesaurus: a historical viewpoint, with a look to the future[J]. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly, 2004, 37(3,4): 5-21.
12. Gruber T R. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications[J]. Knowledge Acquisition, 1993, 5(2): 199-220.
13. Schmitz-Esser W. Thesaurus and beyond: an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval[J]. Knowledge Organization, 1999, 26(1): 10-22.