Separating inner and outer Earth's magnetic field from CHAMP satellite measurements by means of vector scaling functions and wavelets

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 167, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 1188-1203

  Mayer, C ^a   Maier, T ^a  

^a Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

Geomagnetism; Integral transforms; Ionosphere; Numerical techniques

Indexed keywords

GEOMAGNETISM; MAGNETIC FIELD; MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SATELLITE DATA; TRANSFORM; VECTOR; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

EID: 33845344341     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03199.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Backus, G.E., 1986. Poloidal and toroidal fields in geomagnetic field modeling, Rev. Geophys., 24, 75-109.
2. Backus, G.E., Parker, R. & Constable, C., 1996. Foundations of Geomagnetism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3. Bayer, M., 2000. Geomagnetic field modelling from satellite data by first and second generation vector wavelets. PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
4. Bayer, M., Beth, S. & Freeden, W., 1998. Geophysical field modelling by multiresolution analysis. Acta Geod. Geoph. Hung., 33 (2-4), 289-319.
5. Beth, S., 2000. Multiscale approximation by vector radial basis functions on the sphere, PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Shaker, Aachen.
6. Chambodut, A., Panet, I., Mandea, M., Diament, M. & Holschneider, M., 2005. Wavelet frames an alternative to spherical harmonic representation of potential fields, J. Geophys. Int., 163, 875-899, doi:.
7. Davis, P.J., 1963. Interpolation and Approximation, Dover Publications Inc., New York.
8. Driscoll, J.R. & Healy, D.M., 1994. Computing Fourier transforms and convolutions on the 2-sphere, Adv. Appl. Math., 15, 202-250.
9. Edmonds, A.R., 1957. Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
10. Freeden, W., 1998. The uncertainty principle and its role in physical geodesy, in Progress in Geodetic Science, pp. 225-236, ed. Freeden, W., Shaker, Aachen.
11. Freeden, W., Gervens, T. & Schreiner, M., 1998. Constructive Approximation on the Sphere (With Applications to Geomathematics), Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon.
12. Freeden, W. & Maier, T., 2003. Spectral and multiscale signal-to-noise thresholding of spherical vector fields, Comput. Geosci., 7 (3), 215-250.
13. Freeden, W. & Schneider, F., 1998. Regularization wavelets and multiresolution, Inverse Problems, 14, 225-243.
14. Gauss, C.F., 1841. Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus. Resultate aus den Beobachtungen des magnetischen Vereins im Jahre 1838 (English translation: General theory of terrestrial magnetism), in Scientific Memoirs Selected from the Transactions of Foreign Academics of Science and Learned Societies and from Foreign Journals, Vol. 2, pp. 184-251, ed. Taylor, R.J. and R.E. Taylor Pub., London.
15. Gerlich, G., 1972. Magnetfeldbeschreibung mit verallgemeinerten poloidalen und toroidalen skalaren, Z. Naturforsch., 8, 1167-1172.
16. Hogg, R.V., 1979. An introduction to robust estimation, in Robustness in Statistics, pp. 1-17, eds Launer, G.N. & Wilkinson, R.L., Academic, San Diego, California.
17. Holschneider, M., Chambodut, A. & Mandea, M., 2003. From global to regional analysis of the magnetic field on the sphere using wavelet frames, Phys. Earth planet. Inter., 135, 107-124.
18. Jackson, J.D., 1975. Classical Electrodynamics, John Wileys and Sons, New York.
19. Lesur, V., 2006. Introducing Localized Constraints in Global Geomagnetic Field Modelling, Earth Planets Space, 58, 477-483.
20. Maier, T., 2003. Multiscale geomagnetic field modelling from satellite data: Theoretical aspects and numerical application, PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
21. Maier, T., 2005. Wavelet-MIE-representations for solenoidal vector fields with applications to ionospheric geomagnetic data. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 65 (6), 1888-1912.
22. Mhaskar, H.N., Narcowich, F.J., Prestin, J. & Ward, D.J., 2000. Polynomial frames on the sphere. Adv. Comput. Math., 13 (4), 387-403.
23. Maus, S., Rother, M., Holme, R., Lühr, H., Olsen, N. & Haak, V., 2002. First scalar magnetic anomaly map from CHAMP satellite data indicates weak lithospheric field, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29 (14), doi:.
24. Maus, S., Rother, M., Hemant, K., Stolle, C., Lühr, H., Kuvshinov, A. & Olsen, N., 2006. Earth's lithospheric magnetic field determined to spherical harmonic degree 90 from CHAMP satellite measurements, Geophys. J. Int., doi:.
25. Mayer, C., 2003. Wavelet modelling of ionospheric currents and induced magnetic fields from satellite data, PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
26. Michel, V., 2002. A multiscale approximation for operator equations in separable Hilbert spaces-case study: Reconstruction and description of the Earth's interior habilitation, PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.
27. Nutz, H., 2002. A unified setup of gravitational field observables, PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, Shaker, Aachen.
28. Olsen, N., 1997. Ionospheric f region currents at middle and low latitudes estimated from Magsat data, J. geophys. Res., A, 3, 4563-4576.
29. Sabaka, T.J., Olsen, N. & Langel, R.A., 2000. A comprehensive model of the near-earth magnetic field: Phase 3, NASA/TM-2000-209894.
30. Schmitt, B.J., 1995. The poloidal-toroidal representation of solenoidal fields in spherical domains, Analysis, 15, 257-277.
31. Simons, J. F., Dahlen, F.A. & Wieczorek, M.A., 2006. Spatiospectral concentration on a sphere, SIAM review, 48, 504-536.
32. Wieczorek, M.A. & Simons, F.J., 2005. Localized spectral analysis on the sphere. Geophys. J. Int., 162 (3), 655-675. doi:.