Evidence - Based drug policies

Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2006, Pages 36-45

  Brochu, Serge ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Drug laws; Drug prevention program; Drug treatment program; Impact

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845330921     PISSN: 14043858     EISSN: 16512340     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14043850601029026     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Belenko S (2001). Research On Drug Courts: A Critical Review. New York: The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.
2. Botvin JG, Botvin ME, Ruchlin H (1998). School-Based Approaches to Drug Abuse Prevention: Evidence for Effectiveness and Suggestions for Determining Cost-Effectiveness. Washington: NIDA Research Monograph, Institute of Drug Abuse, United States.
3. Brochu S (2006). Drogue et criminalité: Unerelation complexe, and ed. Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal: 240 p.
4. Brochu S, Schneeberger P (2001). Le traitement des toxicomanes dans un contexte de pressions judiciaires. In: Landry M, Guyon L, Brochu S (eds). Impact du traitement en alcoolisme et toxicomanie. Études québé coises. Québec: Les Presses de l'Université Laval. p. 73-94.
5. Donelly N, Hall W, Christie P (2000). The Effects of the Cannabis Expiation Notice System on the Prevalence of Cannabis Use in South Australia: Evidence from the National Drug Strategy Household Surveys 1985-1995. Drug and Alcohol Review 19:265-9.
6. Elsner CM (2005). Drug Use: Extent and Correlates. In: Wright RA, Miller JM (ed.). Encyclopedia of Criminology. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis. p. 453-64.
7. Ennett TS, Rosenbaum DP, Flewelling RL, Beiler GS, Ringwalt CL, Bailey SL (1994a). Long term evaluation of drug abuse resistance education. Addictive Behaviors 19:113-25.
8. Ennett TS, Tobler SM, Ringwalt LC, Flewelling RL (1994b). How effective is drug abuse resistance education? A meta-analysis of project DARE Outcome Evaluation. American Journal of Public Health 84(9):1394-401.
9. Faggiano F, Vigna-Taglianti FD, Versino E, Zambon A, Borraccino A, Lemma P (2005). School-based prevention for illicit drugs' use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003020.
10. Gilbert JM (2005). Drug Use and Criminal Behavior. In: Wright RA, Miller JM (ed.). Encyclopedia of Criminology. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis. p. 446-52.
11. Inciardi JA, Martin SS, Butzin CA, Hooper RM, Harrison LD (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues 27(2):261-78.
12. Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychology Bulletin 112:64-105.
13. Kilpatrick DG, Acierno R, Saunders B, Resnick HS, Best CL, Schnurr PP (2000). Risk factors for adolescent substance abuse and dependence: data from a national sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68:19-30.
14. Korf J (2002). Dutch Coffee Shops and Trends in Cannabis Use. Addictive Behaviors 27:851-66.
15. Mackenzie DL, Wilson DB, Kider SB (2001). Effects of correctional boot camp on offending. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578.
16. Lipton DS (1995). The Effectiveness of Treatment for Drug Abusers Under Criminal Justice Supervision. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
17. Martinson R (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest 42:22-54.
18. Martinson R (1979). New findings, new views: A note of caution regarding the sentencing reform. Hofstra Law Review 7:243-58.
19. McCollister KE, French MT, Inciardi JA, Butzin CA, Martin SS, Hooper RM (2003). Post-Release Substance Abuse Treatment for Criminal Offenders: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19(4):389-407.
20. McCord J (2003). Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587:16-30.
21. McGeorge J, Aitken CK (1997). Effects of cannabis decriminalization in the Australian Capital Territory on university students' patterns of use. Journal of Drug Issues 27:785-93.
22. McGrew JL (2001). History of Alcohol Prohibition. Available from: http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/LIBRARY/studies/NC/nc2a.htm (accessed 1 September 2000).
23. Plourde C, Brochu S (2002). Drugs in prison: A break in the pathway. Substance Use and Misuse 37(1)147-63.
24. Prendergast M, Podus D, Chang E, Urada D (2002). The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: a meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 67(1)153-72.
25. Sherman LW, Gottfredson D, MacKenzie D, Eck J, Reuter P and Bushway S (1997). Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising. Washington D.C.: Office of Justice Programs, Research Report.
26. Taxman FS (1999). Unraveling 'what works' for offenders in substance abuse treatment services. National Drug Court Institute Review 2(2):193-134.
27. Thornton M (1991). The Economics of Prohibition. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
28. Tobler SN, Stratton HH (1997). Effectiveness of School-Based Drug Prevention Programs: A Meta-Analysis of the Research. The Journal of Primary Prevention 18(1):71-128.
29. Walters PJ (2001). Drug Treatment in the Criminal Justice System. Available from: http://www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov (accessed 8 May 2005).
30. West SL, O'Neal KK (2004). Project D.A.R.E. outcome effectiveness revisited. American Journal of Public Health 94(6): 1027-30.
31. Werch CE, Pappas DM, Castellon-Vogel EA (1996). Drug use prevention efforts at colleges and universities in the United States. Substance Use and Misuse 31:65-80.
32. Wilson BD, Gottfredson CD, Najaka SS (2001). School-Based Prevention of Problem Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 17(3):1247-72.