A model for perceptual averaging and stochastic bistable behavior and the role of voluntary control

Neural Computation

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 3069-3096

  Koene, Ansgar R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; STATISTICS; TIME; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

FEEDBACK; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SELECTION BIAS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS; VISION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33845330912     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.12.3069     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Bear, M. F., & Malenka, R. C. (1994). Synapic plasticity: LTP and LTD. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 4, 389-399.
2. Blake, R. (1989). A neural theory of binocular rivalry. Psychological Review, 96, 145-167.
3. Borsellino, A., de Marco, A., Allazetta, A., Rinesi, A., & Bartolini, B. (1972). Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli. Kybernetik, 10, 139-144.
4. Brascamp, J. W., van Ee, R., Pestman, W. R., & van den Berg A.V. (2005). Distribution of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. Journal of Vision, 5, 287-298.
5. Brouwer, G. J., Tong, F., Schwarzbach, J., & van Ee, R. (2004). Neural correlates of stereoscopic depth perception in visual cortex. Society for NeuroScience, 664.13.
6. Budd, J. M., & Kisvarday, Z. F. (2001). Local lateral connectivity of inhibitory clutch cells in layer 4 of cat visual cortex (area 17). Experimental Brain Research, 140(2), 245-250.
7. Chong, S. C., Tadin, D., & Blake R. (2005). Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 5, 1004-1012.
8. Crook, J. M., Kisvarday, Z. F., & Eysel, U. T. (1998). Evidence for a contribution of lateral inhibition tuning and direction selectivity in cat visual cortex: Reversible inactivation of functionally characterized sites combined with neuroanatomical tracing techniques. European Journal of Neuroscience, 10(6), 2056-2075.
9. Dayan, P. (1998). A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Computation, 10, 1119-1135.
10. Ditzinger, T., & Haken, H. (1989). Oscillations in the perception of ambiguous patterns. Biological Cybernetics, 61, 279-287.
11. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415(6870), 429-433.
12. Ernst, M. O., & Buelthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 162-169.
13. Fox, R., & Herrman, J. (1967). Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception and Psychophysics, 2, 432-436.
14. Gomez, C., Argandona, E. D., Solier, R. G., Angulo, J. C., & Vazquez, M. (1995). Timing and competition in networks representing ambiguous figures. Brain and Cognition, 29, 103-114.
15. Goryo, K., Robinson, J. O., & Wilson, J. A. (1984). Selective looking and the Muller-Lyer illusion: The effect of changes in the focus of attention on the Muller-Lyer illusion. Perception, 13, 647-654.
16. Hayashi, R., Maeda, T., Shimojo, S., & Tachi, S., (2004). An integrative model of binocular vision: A stereo model utilizing interocularly unpaired points produces both depth and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 44(20), 2367-2380.
17. Hol, K., Koene, A., & van Ee, R. (2003). Attention-biased multi-stable surface perception in three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Vision, 3, 486-498.
18. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2002). Seeing in depth, Vol 2: Depth perception. Toronto: I. Porteous.
19. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1959). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 148, 574-591.
20. Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1979). Brain mechanisms of vision. Scientific American, 241(3), 150-162.
21. Kalarickal, C. J., & Marshall, J. A. (2000). Neural model of temporal and stochastic properties of binocular rivalry. Neurocomputing, 32-33, 843-853.
22. Kawamoto, A. H., & Anderson, J. A. (1985). A neural network model of multistable perception. Acta Psychologica, 59, 35-65.
23. Lack, L. C. (1978). Selective attention and the control of binocular rivalry. The Hague: Mouton.
24. Laing, C. R., & Chow, C. C. (2002). A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Computational Neuroscien, 12, 39-53.
25. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth Cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35(3), 389-412.
26. Lee, S. H. (2004). Binocular battles on multiple fronts. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 148-151.
27. Lehky, S. (1988). An astable multivibrator model of binocular rivalry. Perception, 17, 215-228.
28. Lehky, S. R., (1995). Binocular rivalry is not chaotic. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B, 259, 71-76.
29. Lehky, S. R., & Blake, R. (1991). Organization of binocular pathways: Modeling and data related to rivalry. Neural Computation, 3, 44-53.
30. Lehky, S. R., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1990). Neural network model of stereoacuity and depth interpolation based on a distributed representation of stereo disparity. Journal of Neuroscience, 10, 2281-2299.
31. Levelt, W. J. M. (1966). The alternation process in binocular rivalry. British Journal of Physiology, 57, 225-238.
32. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.
33. Lumer, E. D. (1998). A neural model of binocular integration and rivalry based on the coordination of action-potential timing in primary visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 553-561.
34. Lund, J. S., Angelucci, A., & Bressloff, P. C. (2003). Anatomical substrates for functional columns in macaque monkey primary visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 13(1), 15-24.
35. Marr, D., & Poggio, T. (1977). A computational theory of human stereo disparity. Science, 194, 283-287.
36. Matsuoka, K. (1984). The dynamic model of binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 49, 201-208.
37. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375-407.
38. Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4, 539-551.
39. Merk, I., & Schnakenberg, J. (2002). A stochastic model of multistable visual perception. Biological Cybernetics, 86, 111-116.
40. Moldakarimov, S., Rollenhagen, J. E., Olson, C. R., & Chow, C. C. (2005). Competitive dynamics in cortical responses to visual stimuli. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(5), 3388-3396.
41. Mueller, T. J. (1990). A physiological model of binocular rivalry. Visual Neuroscience, 4, 63-73.
42. Mueller, T. J., & Blake, R. (1989). A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 61, 223-232.
43. Oruc, I., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2003). Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research, 43, 2451-2468.
44. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Shulman, G. L. (1992). Attentional modulation of figural aftereffect. Perception, 21, 7-19.
46. Stollenwerk, L., & Bode, M. (2003). Lateral neural model of binocular rivalry. Neural Computation, 15, 2863-2882.
47. Sugie, N. (1982). Neural models of brightness perception and retinal rivalry. Biological Cybernetics, 43, 13-21.
48. Suzuki, S., & Grabowecky, M. (2002). Evidence for perceptual "trapping" and adaptation in multistable binocular rivalry. Neuron, 36, 143-157.
49. Toppino, T. C. (2003). Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control. Perception and psychophysics, 65(8), 1285-1295.
50. Treue, S., Hol, K., & Rauber, H.-J. (2000). Seeing multiple directions of motion-physiology and psychophysics. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3), 270-276.
51. Tsal, Y. (1984). A Muller-Lyer illusion induced by selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Experimental Psychology, 36A, 319-333.
52. van Dam, L. C. J., & van Ee, R. (2005). The role of (micro)saccades and blinks in perceptual bi-stability from slant rivalry. Vision Research, 45(18), 2417-2435.
53. van Ee, R. (2005). Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry. Vision Research, 45, 29-40.
54. van Ee, R., Adams, W. J., & Mamassian, P. (2003). Bayesian modeling of cue interaction: Bi-stability in stereoscopic slant perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 20, 1398-1406.
55. van Essen, D. C., Anderson, C. H., & Fellman, D. J. (1992). Information processing in the primate visual system: An integrated systems perspective. Science, 255(5043), 419-423.
56. van Ee, R., Krumina, G., Pont, S. P., & van der Yen, S. (2005). Voluntarily controlled bi-stable slant perception of real and photographed surfaces. Proceedings of the Royal Society London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 272(1559), 141-148.
57. van Ee, R., van Dam L. C. J., & Brouwer, G. J. (2005). Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability. Vision Research, 45, 41-55.
58. van Ee, R., van Dam, L. C. J., & Erkelens, C. J. (2002). Bi-stability in perceived slant when binocular disparity and monocular perspective specify different slants. Journal of Vision, 2, 597-607.
59. Vickers, D. (1972). A cyclic decision model of perceptual alternation. Perception, 1, 31-48.
60. Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(24), 14499-14503.
61. Wilson, H. R., Blake, R., & Lee, S. H. (2001). Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature, 412, 907-910.
62. Zhou, Y. H., Gao, J. B., White, K. D., & Yao, K. (2004). Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception. Biological Cybernetics, 90, 256-263.