Duality models in social psychology: Response to commentaries

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 265-268

  Deutsch, Roland ^a,b   Strack, Fritz ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845327478     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327965pli1703_6     Document Type: Note

References (20)

1. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. L. (2003). The Newell test for a theory of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Science 26, 587-637.
2. Bechara, A. (2005). Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: a neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1458-1463.
3. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
4. Deutsch, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (in press). At the boundaries of automaticity: Negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
5. Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2005). Impulsive and reflective determinants of addictive behavior. In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 45-57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Epstein, S. (1991). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative theory of personality. In R. Curtis (Ed.), The self with others: Convergences in psychoanalytical, social, and personality psychology (pp. 111-137). New York: Guilford.
7. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (in press). Associative and prepositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin.
8. Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2004). On the prepositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 535-542.
9. Hermans, D., Vansteenwegen, D., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Helen, P. (2002). Expectancy-learning and evaluative learning in human classical conditioning: Affective priming as an indirect and unobtrusive measure of conditioned stimulus valence. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 217-234.
10. Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., Nosek, B. A., & Schmitt, M. (in press). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
11. Hofmann, W., Rauch, W., & Gawronski, B. (2005). And deplete us not into temptation: Automatic attitudes, dietary restraint, and self-regulatory resources as determinants of eating behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University Koblenz-Landau, Berlin, Germany.
12. Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflection and reflexion: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 199-249). New York: Academic.
13. Perugini, M. (2005). Predictive models of implicit and explicit attitudes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 29-45.
14. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books.
15. Seibt, B., Häfner, M., & Deutsch, R. (in press). Prepared to eat: How immediate affective and motivational responses to food cues are influenced by food deprivation. European Journal of Social Psychology.
16. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
17. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
18. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247.
19. Strack, F., Werth, L., & Deutsch, R. (2006). Reflective and impulsive determinants of consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 205-216.
20. Werth, L., Markel, P., & Förster, J. (2006). The role of subjective theories for leadership evaluation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 102-127.